16 20 vs .500 Teams says it all.
Last 8 losses this team has allowed 116 points per game. That is not going to get it done.
Cherry-pick all you want.....
7th in point differential, and 1 point within 2 of those teams.
That should say it all.
Anyone who thinks a Celtics loss in the 1st round is more likely than unlikely, obviously doesn't understand power rankings.
Just because we don't have a winning record vs. .500 teams, doesn't mean we haven't "been in the game" with those teams more often than other teams (who have gotten blown out by top teams more often than us).
Here is more picking.
Team does not have a Center or Power Forward that can score or play Defense in the paint. Not to mention the lack of a 3 point shooter. But we already know these things.
Don't drink the Kool-Aid and think this Team with more seasoning this year or next is anything special. Its a .500 Team that will be swept again in Round 1.
Well that statement is wrong. We have several bigs who
can score. Sully and Kelly are big offensive weapons for us during a lot of games. And I believe Sully has proved he can step up defensively this year, he's put in many solid performances against the better bigs in the league.
We do lack consistent 3 point shooting. It is the biggest weakness of our offense. Luckily we are great are generating turnovers and creating fast break opportunities. We are also a very good offensive rebounding team despite our lack of size in the paint.
This team has come on leaps and bounds this year. Not yet a contender but good enough to cause some distress to the incumbent contenders and build some needed experience for future years