0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
Ellenson is like a Kelly O / Sully hybrid.
Quote from: Quetzalcoatl on March 07, 2016, 05:01:54 PMEllenson is like a Kelly O / Sully hybrid. on point =D
Quote from: triboy16f on March 07, 2016, 02:47:03 PMyou can'tEllenson > PoeltlWell there you have it. Debate over.
you can'tEllenson > Poeltl
Quote from: triboy16f on March 07, 2016, 05:43:06 PMQuote from: Quetzalcoatl on March 07, 2016, 05:01:54 PMEllenson is like a Kelly O / Sully hybrid. on point =DThats not a bad hybrid.tho I dont know enough about Ellenson to know if I agree with it.Id assume he plays terrible D?
Quote from: chilidawg on March 07, 2016, 04:43:18 PMQuote from: triboy16f on March 07, 2016, 02:47:03 PMyou can'tEllenson > PoeltlWell there you have it. Debate over.yup. Poeltl is Zeller part 2. Doesn't have the long wingspan, reach, average explosiveness. Can't shoot consistently. Lacks a handle. so so passing skills. Lets see him try to score against trees in the NBA inside the paint consistentlyA good backup center in the nba material. This is how weak this draft is at the center spot this year
Quote from: Ilikesports17 on March 07, 2016, 05:44:07 PMQuote from: triboy16f on March 07, 2016, 05:43:06 PMQuote from: Quetzalcoatl on March 07, 2016, 05:01:54 PMEllenson is like a Kelly O / Sully hybrid. on point =DThats not a bad hybrid.tho I dont know enough about Ellenson to know if I agree with it.Id assume he plays terrible D?ellenson has high leadership skills. top end Motor. Does not take plays off. Will bang inside the paint/box out, take charges, set picks. Just all over the placeHas a nice wingspan/reach. Good shot block timing. Lots of skill on the offensive end from handling the ball, passing, shooting. just needs to up his conditioning which then could also help him become a better rebounder .
Quote from: triboy16f on March 07, 2016, 05:46:37 PMQuote from: chilidawg on March 07, 2016, 04:43:18 PMQuote from: triboy16f on March 07, 2016, 02:47:03 PMyou can'tEllenson > PoeltlWell there you have it. Debate over.yup. Poeltl is Zeller part 2. Doesn't have the long wingspan, reach, average explosiveness. Can't shoot consistently. Lacks a handle. so so passing skills. Lets see him try to score against trees in the NBA inside the paint consistentlyA good backup center in the nba material. This is how weak this draft is at the center spot this year Yo what's up Triboy, You probably know I lihowevery over Jakob at this point, however I feel like you should go back and watch Jakob a little more. He's better right Now than Zeller ever was. It's his absolutely lightning speed and quickness with his fakes and quick twitch body movements that separates him down low. He's so quick with his fakes it's uncanny.
Quote from: KG Living Legend on March 07, 2016, 06:09:17 PMQuote from: triboy16f on March 07, 2016, 05:46:37 PMQuote from: chilidawg on March 07, 2016, 04:43:18 PMQuote from: triboy16f on March 07, 2016, 02:47:03 PMyou can'tEllenson > PoeltlWell there you have it. Debate over.yup. Poeltl is Zeller part 2. Doesn't have the long wingspan, reach, average explosiveness. Can't shoot consistently. Lacks a handle. so so passing skills. Lets see him try to score against trees in the NBA inside the paint consistentlyA good backup center in the nba material. This is how weak this draft is at the center spot this year Yo what's up Triboy, You probably know I lihowevery over Jakob at this point, however I feel like you should go back and watch Jakob a little more. He's better right Now than Zeller ever was. It's his absolutely lightning speed and quickness with his fakes and quick twitch body movements that separates him down low. He's so quick with his fakes it's uncanny.Poeltl is also a MUCH better, more physical defender than Zeller. The comparison on that end of the court isn't even close.
Even if Poeltl is Zeller 2.0 on offense, his rebounding and interior defense should be much better, which would make him an excellent player, if not a star.
Quote from: PhoSita on March 07, 2016, 08:58:15 PMEven if Poeltl is Zeller 2.0 on offense, his rebounding and interior defense should be much better, which would make him an excellent player, if not a star.And he's probably Zeller+ on offense, not just Zeller 2.0.
Quote from: max215 on March 07, 2016, 09:02:01 PMQuote from: PhoSita on March 07, 2016, 08:58:15 PMEven if Poeltl is Zeller 2.0 on offense, his rebounding and interior defense should be much better, which would make him an excellent player, if not a star.And he's probably Zeller+ on offense, not just Zeller 2.0.He is Zeller part 2 on the offensive. I agree will be better defensively but don't expect him to be effective like say Valenciunas Lets compare Valenciunas to Poeltl. Valenciunas has a 7-5-7'6 wingspan and 9'3 reach or something like that. Poeltl on the other hand has a 7'1 wingspan. Guessing 9'0 or 9'1 reach. He is not explosive from standstill. From a headstart yes has some bounce. but so does ZellerWingspan and reach for a front court player matters (especially to be a defensive anchor). You can slice it whichever way you want, it matters. Unless you have some explosive bounce/timing to compensate (example Tristant Thompson as a rebounder and Mickey as a shot blocker)