I think that you underrate how far Doc took some untalented teams.
which untalented teams did Doc take far??
the team that had Dhoward/Torkulu? The team that had the big three? The team that had Griffin/Paul?
Rivers has a place in the league and so does CBS. Rivers is better for managing big personalities/star players. CBS better at developing/managing underrated blue coller workers like Crowder/Smart/KO
Rivers never coached Dwight Howard... O.o
OK. Tracy mcgrady then
Yay! He had one good player in Tracy McGrady, a 21 year-old at that. And practically no one else of note making worthwhile contributions. Yet, he had those teams with winning records and got them into the playoffs.
Prior to that he led a team whose best player was Darrel Armstrong to a .500 record. It does seem like you have no notion on how bad the talent Rivers was working with, and how hard he had them playing.
To discount the accomplishments with those teams, just to accentuate your love for Stevens, is absurd.
A young Mike Miller was on that team also right?
He was pretty good.
We can also say that Bradley is pretty good, that Turner is pretty good, that Crowder is pretty good, that Amir is pretty good, etc., etc..
They're decent players who play a role, that's it. They aren't super stars or anything.
But yeah, pretty much a rookie and a sophomore Mike Miller. That's what he was counting on.
I agree with you. But Mike Miller was better than AB or Crowder. Your post just got me remembering that Mcgrady/Miller combo. To bad they were never able to surround them with better players.
I'd say he was more on par with what Bradley offers us right now, but Crowder this particular season is a head above them.
We also have to account for Miller being a rookie and a sophomore, and the learning curve that comes with it. Surely Doc deserves some credit there, I mean he had to count on 30 minutes or so a night from Miller to get that team to the playoffs.
The main point in all of this is that people are here trying to argue that "look at Stevens what he's accomplished with THIS level of talent, Doc can't hold a candle to him", but forget that Doc had similar teams in the past, one can argue even worse than this (and I'd argue that easily), and had similar success. But more importantly, he had those teams over-performing. It's why he won Coach of the Year back then, one of those rare years in which the award was actually earned.
Would've loved to see those teams with a healthy Grant Hill.