Author Topic: Celtics (18-15) at Nets (10-23) Game #34 1/4/16  (Read 32656 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (18-15) at Nets (10-23) Game #34 1/4/16
« Reply #210 on: January 04, 2016, 08:44:49 PM »

Offline DefenseWinsChamps

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6755
  • Tommy Points: 810
Sometimes I have doubts, but it's the little things in that half that make me think Smart can be a good two-way player. He may never be a dominate scorer, but his passing ability and offensive IQ makes him a threat. If he could improve his shot selection, get to the rim more, and continue to improve his shooting, then I see him as a great off-guard next to Thomas.

Re: Celtics (18-15) at Nets (10-23) Game #34 1/4/16
« Reply #211 on: January 04, 2016, 08:47:07 PM »

Offline TheLegendaryClub

  • Al Horford
  • Posts: 478
  • Tommy Points: 130
Agree with the posters saying we need to sit Lee. He doesn't do enough on defense, and he misses too many bunnies and has too many of his shots blocked on offense. I feel like CBS has been giving him minutes to keep him from complaining and becoming a locker room distraction, but honesty, who cares if he pitches a fit? He's already trade fodder at the deadline. Sit him. Zeller is a great pick and roll player. He needs to improve his rebounding, but scoring wise at least he earns his minutes. Let him play.

Re: Celtics (18-15) at Nets (10-23) Game #34 1/4/16
« Reply #212 on: January 04, 2016, 08:47:31 PM »

Offline jpotter33

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 51955
  • Tommy Points: 3186
Really like this lineup out here.

I really do think that Bradley's sub-par ball-handling and passing hurt us more than we think.

That's interesting. I hadn't thought of it like that. We do miss his shooting, though. 2-13?

I'm happy to be your 400th TP for that insight.

Haha back at ya! Yeah, we definitely miss his shooting with Turner not providing much from the outside.
Recovering Joe Skeptic, but inching towards a relapse.

Check out my Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@Yakin_Bassin/shorts

Re: Celtics (18-15) at Nets (10-23) Game #34 1/4/16
« Reply #213 on: January 04, 2016, 08:47:35 PM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19003
  • Tommy Points: 1833
Lopez with a double team Crowder/Olynyk... still scores.

Re: Celtics (18-15) at Nets (10-23) Game #34 1/4/16
« Reply #214 on: January 04, 2016, 08:48:53 PM »

Offline jpotter33

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 51955
  • Tommy Points: 3186
Do not like the energy in this half.
Recovering Joe Skeptic, but inching towards a relapse.

Check out my Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@Yakin_Bassin/shorts

Re: Celtics (18-15) at Nets (10-23) Game #34 1/4/16
« Reply #215 on: January 04, 2016, 08:49:26 PM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19003
  • Tommy Points: 1833
[dang] you Young, Olynyk knocks the ball off your hand, you still hit it.

Re: Celtics (18-15) at Nets (10-23) Game #34 1/4/16
« Reply #216 on: January 04, 2016, 08:50:26 PM »

Offline flybono

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1025
  • Tommy Points: 49
JYoung bust

Re: Celtics (18-15) at Nets (10-23) Game #34 1/4/16
« Reply #217 on: January 04, 2016, 08:50:32 PM »

Online slamtheking

  • NCE
  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32318
  • Tommy Points: 10098
takeaways from first half:
Sully on the bench -- C's can't control defensive boards.
IT's D has made Nets' PGs look like starter material.
Smart just has a positive affect whenever he's on the court even when he's not scoring.

Re: Celtics (18-15) at Nets (10-23) Game #34 1/4/16
« Reply #218 on: January 04, 2016, 08:50:34 PM »

Offline BitterJim

  • NGT
  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9182
  • Tommy Points: 1238
Do not like the energy in this half.

We need to put Smart in
I'm bitter.

Re: Celtics (18-15) at Nets (10-23) Game #34 1/4/16
« Reply #219 on: January 04, 2016, 08:50:48 PM »

Offline jpotter33

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 51955
  • Tommy Points: 3186
Whatever happened to Hollins wanting Lopez to start shooting threes?
Recovering Joe Skeptic, but inching towards a relapse.

Check out my Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@Yakin_Bassin/shorts

Re: Celtics (18-15) at Nets (10-23) Game #34 1/4/16
« Reply #220 on: January 04, 2016, 08:52:18 PM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19003
  • Tommy Points: 1833
Whomever is on the Nets broadcast sounds a lot like Mannix

Re: Celtics (18-15) at Nets (10-23) Game #34 1/4/16
« Reply #221 on: January 04, 2016, 08:53:10 PM »

Offline SCeltic34

  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17994
  • Tommy Points: 2339
Much better after a slow start to the half.  Brad should rip into his team regardless.  Can't come out starting the half like that.

Re: Celtics (18-15) at Nets (10-23) Game #34 1/4/16
« Reply #222 on: January 04, 2016, 08:53:50 PM »

Offline ImShakHeIsShaq

  • NCE
  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7739
  • Tommy Points: 804
KO hasn't hit a 3 but you can see how the threat opens the paint for Amir.
It takes me 3hrs to get to Miami and 1hr to get to Orlando... but I *SPIT* on their NBA teams! "Bless God and bless the (Celts)"-Lady GaGa (she said gays but she really meant Celts)

Re: Celtics (18-15) at Nets (10-23) Game #34 1/4/16
« Reply #223 on: January 04, 2016, 08:54:15 PM »

Offline Chief

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21257
  • Tommy Points: 2451
Give it to Amir in the post!
Once you are labeled 'the best' you want to stay up there, and you can't do it by loafing around.
 
Larry Bird

Re: Celtics (18-15) at Nets (10-23) Game #34 1/4/16
« Reply #224 on: January 04, 2016, 08:54:21 PM »

Offline Rosco917

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6108
  • Tommy Points: 559
 With KO in the game, the floor opens up, and gives Turner and IT lanes to the basket. As opposed to Bradley, who seldom takes it to the rim. Starting KO with Turner is actually a good idea.