Author Topic: Nets (9-23) at Celtics (18-14) Game #33 1/2/16  (Read 42310 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Nets (9-23) at Celtics (18-14) Game #33 1/2/16
« Reply #405 on: January 02, 2016, 05:51:09 PM »

Offline greece66

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7395
  • Tommy Points: 1342
  • Head Paperboy at Greenville
bad things happen to all  teams - maybe not GSW...

even Cavs and SAS had some silly losses in this season.

Re: Nets (9-23) at Celtics (18-14) Game #33 1/2/16
« Reply #406 on: January 02, 2016, 05:51:16 PM »

Offline tankcity!

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1903
  • Tommy Points: 129
Brad really needs to jump the guys' arses.

Any word on the Jack injury? That could go a long ways toward helping the Brooklyn pick.

Brad has been doing that the whole year. I think it's silly to think this team is greater than it is. They are not a consistent basketball team because they don't have consistent players. If they did, they would be a contender...Celtics fans need to get used to this until either one of the players on the roster makes a leap, or they obtain a superstar.

Re: Nets (9-23) at Celtics (18-14) Game #33 1/2/16
« Reply #407 on: January 02, 2016, 05:58:52 PM »

Offline Ogaju

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19479
  • Tommy Points: 1871
Brooklyn's top three players are better than our top three players.

Re: Nets (9-23) at Celtics (18-14) Game #33 1/2/16
« Reply #408 on: January 02, 2016, 06:06:03 PM »

Online sahara

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 860
  • Tommy Points: 84
Fire all. Trade all. Burn the Garden. I´ll take Bill´s statue.

Re: Nets (9-23) at Celtics (18-14) Game #33 1/2/16
« Reply #409 on: January 02, 2016, 06:10:26 PM »

Offline Ogaju

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19479
  • Tommy Points: 1871
Fire all. Trade all. Burn the Garden. I´ll take Bill´s statue.

that is mot realistic...

Playing the kids is though. Play the kids, and stop acting like we can win a championship with this team. If CBS does not like it then trade him.

Re: Nets (9-23) at Celtics (18-14) Game #33 1/2/16
« Reply #410 on: January 02, 2016, 06:10:27 PM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182
Brooklyn's top three players are better than our top three players.

Agreed. Watch out the for the mob with pitchforks that'll come after you for saying so though.
You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain

Re: Nets (9-23) at Celtics (18-14) Game #33 1/2/16
« Reply #411 on: January 02, 2016, 06:17:41 PM »

Offline Surferdad

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15241
  • Tommy Points: 1034
  • "He fiddles...and diddles..."
Brooklyn's top three players are better than our top three players.
Only in this game. 

Re: Nets (9-23) at Celtics (18-14) Game #33 1/2/16
« Reply #412 on: January 02, 2016, 06:17:44 PM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
Bill SImmons' thoughts on tonight's game:

Quote
Bill Simmons ‏@BillSimmons 43m43 minutes ago

This NBA season can go to hell.

Re: Nets (9-23) at Celtics (18-14) Game #33 1/2/16
« Reply #413 on: January 02, 2016, 06:17:54 PM »

Offline esel1000

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11547
  • Tommy Points: 587
Brooklyn's top three players are better than our top three players.

Agreed. Watch out the for the mob with pitchforks that'll come after you for saying so though.

That's an insult to IT to say Joe Johnson is better. He isn't. In fact though they play two separate positions I'd take IT over Young. Nets do have the best player in Lopez though

Re: Nets (9-23) at Celtics (18-14) Game #33 1/2/16
« Reply #414 on: January 02, 2016, 06:21:59 PM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182
Brooklyn's top three players are better than our top three players.

Agreed. Watch out the for the mob with pitchforks that'll come after you for saying so though.

That's an insult to IT to say Joe Johnson is better. He isn't. In fact though they play two separate positions I'd take IT over Young. Nets do have the best player in Lopez though

Lopez, Young, Jack versus Thomas, Bradley, Crowder

Size wins it for me. Lopez is a really good player so long as he's healthy.
You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain

Re: Nets (9-23) at Celtics (18-14) Game #33 1/2/16
« Reply #415 on: January 02, 2016, 06:22:22 PM »

Offline jambr380

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13751
  • Tommy Points: 2061
  • Sometimes there's no sane reason for optimism
Brooklyn's top three players are better than our top three players.

Agreed. Watch out the for the mob with pitchforks that'll come after you for saying so though.

Total exaggeration. Lopez is probably the best of all, but IT, Crowder, and Bradley are all better than Young and Johnson - although those two often save their best for us.

Re: Nets (9-23) at Celtics (18-14) Game #33 1/2/16
« Reply #416 on: January 02, 2016, 07:19:44 PM »

Offline Neurotic Guy

  • Tommy Heinsohn
  • *************************
  • Posts: 25541
  • Tommy Points: 2720
Someone give me an update on what just went down. I saw Smart got two consecutive steals, then how'd we lose??

we were 5points down to begin with. After the second steal, Crowder got the ball, passed to IT, IT passed to the left corner to Jerebko who missed the open 3.

TURNER passed it.

Did we have a timeout and not use it again?

I don't know if we had one but I would be p---ed if we did, it hasn't worked ONCE when after timeout plays worked for us ALL LAST SEASON! [dang] shame if we had one. I was calling for a timeout but tommy nor mike commented on whether we had one.

Apparently we did. We've been screwed nearly half a dozen times by Stevens not calling a timeout in this situations. UGGGHHH! It's not that hard, Brad, we don't have the personnel to do that! So, so stupid. Brad isn't as smart as we all thought he was if he just continues to not see how bad this strategy is when it hasn't worked for us all year long.

Not sure I agree this time.  We had their defense off-balance and it did actually produce an open 3.  If the ball was swung the other way, it may have produce an open 3 for IT or Jae.   A timeout would have given Nets the opportunity to organize defensively -- we've been in that postion too -- unable to find a clean shot.  Remember, there was no AB or RJH available.   Brad may have been correct.

Re: Nets (9-23) at Celtics (18-14) Game #33 1/2/16
« Reply #417 on: January 02, 2016, 07:27:07 PM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182
Brooklyn's top three players are better than our top three players.

Agreed. Watch out the for the mob with pitchforks that'll come after you for saying so though.

Total exaggeration. Lopez is probably the best of all, but IT, Crowder, and Bradley are all better than Young and Johnson - alth ough those two often save their best for us.

The way I see it both Thomas and Lopez are borderline All Star talents, but Lopez has size that allows him to prevail in situations Thomas gets bottled up.

The other four names are all decent players. I think Thad Young is an underrated consistent producer who brings athleticism and a physical edge to the 4 position.

If you look around the league the teams that make the playoffs year after year tend to have high quality frontcourt players. You also need a good point guard. But good point guards are easier to find.

So I think you'd have an easier time building a quality team with a Young - Lopez frontcourt as your starting point.

It's not a major difference either way, but the point is that the Nets have some really solid players at the top of their roster. That's how they manage to compete in ways that other teams with similar records often don't. They're also well coached and have plenty of veteran experience.
You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain

Re: Nets (9-23) at Celtics (18-14) Game #33 1/2/16
« Reply #418 on: January 02, 2016, 08:15:01 PM »

Offline KG Living Legend

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8671
  • Tommy Points: 1138

 Just got home and boy am I Pi ss ed that we are not in control of this game.

 I'm all on board for trading for Thaddeus Young.
Thad is ok, but Lopez is the real beast of that team.





 Agreed, but Lopez would cost too much for me. Thad could be had easily for us if the Nets would ever answer the phone again.

 Without Lopez or Young they would have a really hard time winning.

Re: Nets (9-23) at Celtics (18-14) Game #33 1/2/16
« Reply #419 on: January 02, 2016, 08:52:27 PM »

Offline chambers

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7483
  • Tommy Points: 943
  • Boston Celtics= Championships, nothing less.
I didn't get to see the game...
Can anyone give a run down of how we lost?
Can't believe we've dropped 2 games to this horrible team.
"We are lucky we have a very patient GM that isn't willing to settle for being good and coming close. He wants to win a championship and we have the potential to get there still with our roster and assets."

quoting 'Greg B' on RealGM after 2017 trade deadline.
Read that last line again. One more time.