Is anyone else starting to like Ingram > Simmons #1?
-Both are quick and explosive, but not out of this world athletic. Ingram is 2" longer, Simmons is 40lb heavier. To my eye Ingram is a bit quicker laterally, while Simmons is more explosive vertically - probably a reflection of weight difference.
-Both have an excellent handle for a forward
-Both have a lot of potential on defense due to tools, but need to work on fundamentals. Ingram also has questions about his motor.
-Simmons has elite passing and feel for the game, an area where Ingram is average. Ingram is clearly rawer on both ends.
-Ingram is almost a full year younger, so the difference in feel might be smaller than it seems
-Ingram is a shooting threat from midrange and college 3, with excellent mechanics and a quick release. This could become his primary weapon in the NBA, and at worst he'll keep defenses honest. Simmons struggles as a shooter, although it's too early to say his shot is broken.
-Simmons seems like a more competitive, high-motor player.
3pt shooting is extremely valuable for a modern wing player. Simmons risks being a rich man's Evan Turner - point forward who is very good at a lot of things, but whose shot limits his offensive value. Ingram is a safer bet on offense, as he can certainly be a good role player on that end. But Simmons with his higher motor and strength advantage seems like a better bet on defense.
It's very close, but I slightly prefer Ingram. I also love Bender, but I'm not ready to put him in the #1 conversation yet.