Author Topic: No disgruntled stars, no players in KG like situation. Danny stuck?  (Read 6198 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: No disgruntled stars, no players in KG like situation. Danny stuck?
« Reply #45 on: December 07, 2015, 09:10:53 PM »

Offline Smartacus

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2166
  • Tommy Points: 321
Funnily enough considering he said that he said that he could see being a lifer in Milwaukee, Jabari Parker is IMO one the most likely players to see an early trade.

He's pretty redundant after Giannis, has injury concerns, and it seems like he might be losing favor with Jason Kidd. Might be a player worth targeting for the right price.

Edit: He did just score a season high 17 points in a win over The Knicks Saturday so this might be premature.

Re: No disgruntled stars, no players in KG like situation. Danny stuck?
« Reply #46 on: December 07, 2015, 09:29:31 PM »

Offline moiso

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7677
  • Tommy Points: 447
Gortat?  Washington doesn't look good.  If wall is out they might look to move him in right deal.
maybe Noel, philly needs some vets on that team.  Okafor is by far the superior player.  Noel is a very good defender but not very polished otherwise.  Sully, young, draft picks?
I like the Gortat idea.  I think he's been underutilized on Washington. 

Re: No disgruntled stars, no players in KG like situation. Danny stuck?
« Reply #47 on: December 07, 2015, 09:56:18 PM »

Offline Celtics4ever

  • NCE
  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20090
  • Tommy Points: 1331
I would love to see us grab Parker, Smartacus.

Re: No disgruntled stars, no players in KG like situation. Danny stuck?
« Reply #48 on: December 08, 2015, 09:45:27 PM »

Offline Casperian

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3501
  • Tommy Points: 545

Maybe Christmas will come early.    Hold tight.   

Lee, Amir, Smart, Jerebko and the top 1 protected Brooklyn pick for Carmelo Anthony and Robin Lopez.   51 wins here we come.

Man, that would be terrible.

I'd have no problem with us making that trade. In fact I would do it without hesitation.

Carmelo doesn't have any real upside in him at this point, but it doesn't really matter to be honest because at the age of 31 he's still one of 5 or 10 best offensive players in the league, and is also an elite rebounder and skilled passer at his position.

More importantly Melo is a guy who dominates his opponents with skill and fundamentals (good form, good footwork, high basketball IQ) rather than outright athleticism - much like Pierce.  His game should age well, and I expect that as long as his body holds up he should have another 4 - 5 years of quality basketball left in him.

If anything the way the league is going (with the whole 'going small' thing) should benefit Carmelo's longevity, because when he eventually does lose his quickness he'll still have the size (6'8", 240 pounds, 7'0" wingspan), rebounding ability (7.5 Reb Per 36), shooting range (36% 3PT), passing ability (3.3 AST Per 36) and post-up game to evolve into the penultimate stretch four.

A guy like Melo (ability to create his own offense, ability to dominate in ISO situations, ability to get to the line consistently, elite clutch game) is exactly the type of piece this Celtics team needs to push it to the next level, and even Carmelo's monstrous $22M / 3YR contract will seem like decent value (relative to his production) with the upcoming cap rises.

It's not about his upside, it's about what he is right now. I also think you're using terms like "elite " and "dominant" very loosely. If you reduce their games to the absolute basic level, sure, Carmelo is a lot like Pierce. Except what PP did and does on the court has a clear purpose, whereas Anthony is the very definiton of a choker.

I want you to go back and rewatch the last playoff series the KG/Pierce Celtics played against the Knicks, and especially keep an eye on Anthony. He single-handedly played his team out of two games with a series of moronic decisions on offense, and was basically the sole reason the series even lasted 6 games.

Mentioning his wingspan, height, weigth and a few stats in a vacuum does nothing to change my opinion of the player I saw lose games on his own way too many times.

Terrible, terrible idea, which could single-handedly sabotage what we've built over the last few years.
In the summer of 2017, I predicted this team would not win a championship for the next 10 years.

3 down, 7 to go.

Re: No disgruntled stars, no players in KG like situation. Danny stuck?
« Reply #49 on: December 08, 2015, 10:01:11 PM »

Offline Future Celtics Owner

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3097
  • Tommy Points: 191
  • Celtic's only raise championship Banners
Coming from someone who has truly seen the worst that gambling addiction brings, which is in many forms; I can tell you without a doubt that betting on the right stars to become available AND THEN trading for them= just as much risk as or maybe more than the lottery and draft selection process.