Author Topic: Celtics (7-5) at Nets (2-11) Game #13 11/22/15  (Read 55908 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (7-5) at Nets (2-11) Game #13 11/22/15
« Reply #345 on: November 22, 2015, 08:15:37 PM »

Offline JSD

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12590
  • Tommy Points: 2159
these refs have been awful from the very start of this game.

Re: Celtics (7-5) at Nets (2-11) Game #13 11/22/15
« Reply #346 on: November 22, 2015, 08:15:39 PM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19003
  • Tommy Points: 1833
So... Jack can jump into our guys to get the foul call, but Crowder does his normal shooting motion, coincidentally trips a defender running to him, and he gets called for a foul

Genius.

Re: Celtics (7-5) at Nets (2-11) Game #13 11/22/15
« Reply #347 on: November 22, 2015, 08:15:55 PM »

Offline CelticSooner

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11884
  • Tommy Points: 902
  • GOT IT!!!
Great lesson here for the C's... actually play hard for 48 and you have a chance at a victory. This game and the Mavs game...

First half defense was pitful.

Re: Celtics (7-5) at Nets (2-11) Game #13 11/22/15
« Reply #348 on: November 22, 2015, 08:15:57 PM »

Offline Walter Moss

  • Brad Stevens
  • Posts: 234
  • Tommy Points: 37
its 4-15 AM here and im in a daze so pls tell me
what was that call on JC?

Re: Celtics (7-5) at Nets (2-11) Game #13 11/22/15
« Reply #349 on: November 22, 2015, 08:16:01 PM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 52857
  • Tommy Points: 2569
Unbelievable they called that on Crowder. How was that not a natural shooting motion?

Ridiculous call. 

Re: Celtics (7-5) at Nets (2-11) Game #13 11/22/15
« Reply #350 on: November 22, 2015, 08:16:02 PM »

Offline Monkhouse

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6932
  • Tommy Points: 814
  • A true Celtic plays with heart.
Still think us missing Smart was a huge loss.

I don't get why people are so afraid to admit Smart is such a huge contributing to our teams success on defense...

I mean would you be content with IT guarding Westbrook or Harden?
"I bomb atomically, Socrates' philosophies and hypotheses
Can't define how I be dropping these mockeries."

Is the glass half-full or half-empty?
It's based on your perspective, quite simply
We're the same and we're not; know what I'm saying? Listen
Son, I ain't better than you, I just think different

Re: Celtics (7-5) at Nets (2-11) Game #13 11/22/15
« Reply #351 on: November 22, 2015, 08:16:04 PM »

Offline makaveli

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3154
  • Tommy Points: 321
  • The Truth
shocking shocking calls all day long.
 :o :o :o :o :o
what doesn't kill you makes you stronger

Re: Celtics (7-5) at Nets (2-11) Game #13 11/22/15
« Reply #352 on: November 22, 2015, 08:16:19 PM »

Offline kozlodoev

  • NCE
  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17914
  • Tommy Points: 1294
Congrats, you lost to the Brooklyn Nets because the only play your coach can draw seems to be a three point shot.

Hard for the Celts to score inside on the length of this Nets team. 
If Brook Lopez is stopping you, you've got issues.
"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."

Re: Celtics (7-5) at Nets (2-11) Game #13 11/22/15
« Reply #353 on: November 22, 2015, 08:16:22 PM »

Offline Ilikesports17

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8728
  • Tommy Points: 855
What did they actually call on Crowder? I'm honestly confused, as I saw no violation of any sort.
You cant kick your legs out on a 3 in attempt to draw an foul.

obviously thats not what happened but its what was called

Re: Celtics (7-5) at Nets (2-11) Game #13 11/22/15
« Reply #354 on: November 22, 2015, 08:16:22 PM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182
Let's get ahead of this one -- do not blame this loss on that awful call on the Crowder 3.
You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain

Re: Celtics (7-5) at Nets (2-11) Game #13 11/22/15
« Reply #355 on: November 22, 2015, 08:16:25 PM »

Offline jpotter33

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 51955
  • Tommy Points: 3186
I'm driving home and can only see play-by-play updates, but there seems to be an absurd amount of offensive fouls being called on us. Good calls or no?
Recovering Joe Skeptic, but inching towards a relapse.

Check out my Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@Yakin_Bassin/shorts

Re: Celtics (7-5) at Nets (2-11) Game #13 11/22/15
« Reply #356 on: November 22, 2015, 08:17:21 PM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182
Congrats, you lost to the Brooklyn Nets because the only play your coach can draw seems to be a three point shot.

Hard for the Celts to score inside on the length of this Nets team. 
If Brook Lopez is stopping you, you've got issues.

The Celts do have issues -- they lack size, especially in the backcourt.  Their ability to finish inside against bigger, longer teams is severely hampered, especially if they can't force turnovers and speed up the pace.
You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain

Re: Celtics (7-5) at Nets (2-11) Game #13 11/22/15
« Reply #357 on: November 22, 2015, 08:17:38 PM »

Offline KeepRondo

  • NCE
  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5161
  • Tommy Points: 215
Bradley did the same thing Crowder did and no call.

Re: Celtics (7-5) at Nets (2-11) Game #13 11/22/15
« Reply #358 on: November 22, 2015, 08:17:44 PM »

Offline hpantazo

  • Tommy Heinsohn
  • *************************
  • Posts: 25355
  • Tommy Points: 2756
What did they actually call on Crowder? I'm honestly confused, as I saw no violation of any sort.
You cant kick your legs out on a 3 in attempt to draw an offensive foul.

obviously thats not what happened but its what was called


Wow. Ok. Thanks for the clarification, I didn't see what they actually called, and Scal and Mike didn't state what the violation was. That's awful!

Re: Celtics (7-5) at Nets (2-11) Game #13 11/22/15
« Reply #359 on: November 22, 2015, 08:17:56 PM »

Offline CelticsBR

  • Jrue Holiday
  • Posts: 388
  • Tommy Points: 35
really? Kicking while shooting a 3pter CAN BE a foul, but not if the guy is 2 meters away from you. It is not the shooters' issue if there is a guy running over you without any control AFTER YOU HAVE RELEASED THE BALL