Author Topic: Bob Cousy says he'd rather tank/draft than get stuck in the middle of the pack.  (Read 14613 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline GreenWarrior

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3275
  • Tommy Points: 228
I can't believe there's actually an argument against tanking. I really can't.

Ainge has even said he tried to get worse. he brought in players that we should've have been able to tank with. but as luck would have it, the east being the east we still found ourselves in the playoffs...with a losing record.

and yet this delusional fanbase insists that Ainge wants to build this team with late 1st and 2nd rnd picks instead. no he doesn't these are the cards he's dealt.

the only reason he went ahead and grabbed IT was because of his contract...and the lack of talent on this team is alarming. we needed someone to be able to showcase in a trade besides the plethora of draft picks we have for a draft that's not supposed to be all that good. because as it turns out all these "assets" aren't that attractive to other teams. don't fall in love with IT he's the only thing we got that might entice a team.


Offline truthhurts34

  • The Green Kornet
  • Posts: 75
  • Tommy Points: 11
1978 was nearly 40 years ago.

Besides Bird and McHale the other list of high picks given that amount of time really isn't anything to write home about.

I mean, every other team of the past 40 years have picked the antoine walkers of the world, mercer and Billups etc.

In fact we've had better picks later on in the draft during the newer era in Pierce, Joe Johnson, Big Al and Rajon.

That list trumps our 90s picks that went higher.


Offline truthhurts34

  • The Green Kornet
  • Posts: 75
  • Tommy Points: 11
I can't believe there's actually an argument against tanking. I really can't.

Ainge has even said he tried to get worse. he brought in players that we should've have been able to tank with. but as luck would have it, the east being the east we still found ourselves in the playoffs...with a losing record.

and yet this delusional fanbase insists that Ainge wants to build this team with late 1st and 2nd rnd picks instead. no he doesn't these are the cards he's dealt.

the only reason he went ahead and grabbed IT was because of his contract...and the lack of talent on this team is alarming. we needed someone to be able to showcase in a trade besides the plethora of draft picks we have for a draft that's not supposed to be all that good. because as it turns out all these "assets" aren't that attractive to other teams. don't fall in love with IT he's the only thing we got that might entice a team.

No, the difference is we got our high draft pick in smart. We are past the tanking phase regardless what you think ainge wants.

Fact is you don't acquire players like thomas, lee or sign amir Johnson if you prefer to tank. We also acquired thomas when we had a poor record.

Perhaps you are the delusional one here.

Offline Casperian

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3501
  • Tommy Points: 545
Dunno what all the fuss is about. Cooz said exactly the same thing 3 years ago. He was right back then, he is right now.

Thing is, we already dipped into the lottery two years ago, and we're not "stuck" in the middle, at all. We are the 5th youngest team in the league, and on the rise. You can't stay at the bottom forever.
In the summer of 2017, I predicted this team would not win a championship for the next 10 years.

3 down, 7 to go.

Offline GC003332

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 804
  • Tommy Points: 62
Happy 87th Birthday Mr Cousy.

Wonder between bingo,naps and trips to the toilet if he is aware of the Celtics owning the Nets first rounder next year.

Have a great day Bob ;)

Offline BballTim

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23724
  • Tommy Points: 1123
When have the Celts ever gotten a good pick? When have they ever gone into a lottery and came out with "phew. That is exactly why we did this"?  or even "thank gosh we didn't go down"?  Joe Johnson? When they were supposed to be 8th and got 8th?

The lottery never helps the Celtics. They have never gone into it and come away with any kind of advantage over other teams. They have never won, or even moved up, in the lottery. They have only lost the lottery.

Plus this team was far too good, even early on, for a top 6 pick. This team was looking at maybe 9th at best. Frank Kaminsky. Whoop de doo.
assuming the above is a real question and not simply a snarky over generalizaiton, by good pick, do you mean "top 6"? (since bird was taken at #6, it is reasonable to extend "good pick" this far out.)

if so, then a 5 minute search on the web would have shown you this:

2014 - 6th pick
2007 - 5th pick
1997 - 3rd pick & 6th pick
1996 - 6th pick
1986 - 2nd pick
1980 - 1st pick, traded down to 3rd pick
1978 - 6th pick

Let's evaluate our success with what is considered "tanking" (a newfangled catch-all word for describing bottoming out).

1978 - 6th pick - Larry Bird.   Nice
1980 - 3rd pick - Kevin McHale.... nice
1986  2nd pick - Len Bias - ouch.  Unprecedented situation.  Could have been amazing.
1996 - 6th pick - 3x All-star Antoine Walker
1997 - Considered a 1 player draft with Duncan.  Maybe a 2 player draft as some folks like Van Horn.  We got Billups #3 (5x All-star and Finals MVP).  #6 - Ron Mercer... not great, but he averaged 17 points, 4 rebounds, 2.5 assists and 1.6 steals with 43% shooting and 79% from the line his second year in Boston.  I'd gladly take that from any of our rookies.  Mercer peaked in Chicago by averaging 20 points, 4 rebounds, 3.3 assists and 1.3 steals.  Again... I'd take it.  Marcus Smart just averaged 7.8 points, 3.3 rebounds, 3.1 assists and 1.5 steals and people talk about him like the second coming of Christ.  Not a bad haul all things considered.
2007 - #5 pick - We flipped it for Ray Allen, which opened the door to bringing in KG... and directly lead to us winning a championship.
2014 - #6 - Marcus Smart.  Again, the jury is out on Smart, but he's very clearly our most valuable asset and many believe he's a future star.   Not bad.

Aside from Bias, I'd say "tanking" has worked fairly well for us.

  86, Bias, never played for us.

  96, Antoine, peaked as a player when he was 24 or so and declined from then on.

  97, 3rd pick in a 1-2 player draft. Billups took about  teams to get good, Mercer was  good numbers on a bad team type of player.

  2006, 1-2 picks outside of the blue-chip range, used it to get out of a year of Raef's contract.

  2007, 5th pick in a 4 player draft, which we managed to flip to Seattle, who wanted to move Allen and usher in the KD era.

  2014, Marcus Smart, jury's still out.
  Bias was bad luck, and Danny did what he could with some of the picks, but he wasn't getting any real franchise changers out of all of those trips to the bottom.

Offline GreenFaith1819

  • NCE
  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15402
  • Tommy Points: 2785
Well, I'm thankful for Coach Brad Stevens. He wasn't playing into that tanking business.

He took a page from Sweet Brown's book - not Philly's:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gLMSf4afzo

He's building a winning culture here in BOS and it will pay off soon enough. Just gotta be patient.


Offline Future Celtics Owner

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3097
  • Tommy Points: 191
  • Celtic's only raise championship Banners
Ainge is guilty of not waiving Brandon Bass, Jonas, and Gigi at the trade deadline. If he had done that we would have Myles Turner on this team or Stanley Johnson or Justise Winslow. IMO , and I have stated this a million times, Myles Turner would have been a great value pick at 11. Yes his body and hips need some time but everything else is there to make a great/ All-Star Big man.........instead we made the playoffs and got swept, netting us Terry Rozier.

Offline D.o.s.

  • NCE
  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14061
  • Tommy Points: 1239
He's building a winning culture here in BOS and it will pay off soon enough. Just gotta be patient.

Probably not as fast as the winning culture Doc built in 2007. Totally set us up for 2008.

Not even worth arguing about the merits of a bad/intentionally underachieving season or two at this point. The dogma is too strong -- I think we'd have an easier time brokering peace between Israel and Palestine than getting the people on the two sides of this fence to call a truce.
At least a goldfish with a Lincoln Log on its back goin' across your floor to your sock drawer has a miraculous connotation to it.

Offline Celtics4ever

  • NCE
  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20116
  • Tommy Points: 1333
Quote
Probably not as fast as the winning culture Doc built in 2007. Totally set us up for 2008.

Doc had a loaded team due to Ainge but he did bring a culture to it that was rich in winning and teamwork.   But he had three HOF veterans.

Offline guava_wrench

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9931
  • Tommy Points: 777
I know people love to say/see these statements but it doesn't make it any more sensible when a great player says it. It is EXTREMELY rare for a team to skip the middle and then win the chip, it just doesn't jive with reality no matter who says it! You don't go from the bottom to a title except for maybe a couple teams in history!
I don't think people are saying to skip the middle. They just want to reach the middle with a star already on board.

If you reach the middle with a bunch of nobodies, like on our team, to peak in the middle. If you reach the middle with some great young talent, you work your way up from there as they develop.

So what Cousy says IS sensible. His point is that you need the stars. Without the stars, you will have to be happy with annual first round knockouts.

He also never said he was willing to 'tank'. He just said it is better to be at the bottom than the middle. Contextually, it is clear that he meant this in the case of a team without stars.

Offline D.o.s.

  • NCE
  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14061
  • Tommy Points: 1239
Quote
Probably not as fast as the winning culture Doc built in 2007. Totally set us up for 2008.

Doc had a loaded team due to Ainge but he did bring a culture to it that was rich in winning and teamwork.  

That's an interesting way to look at Doc's career pre KG and Ray.
At least a goldfish with a Lincoln Log on its back goin' across your floor to your sock drawer has a miraculous connotation to it.

Offline Beat LA

  • NCE
  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8338
  • Tommy Points: 896
  • Mr. Emoji
When have the Celts ever gotten a good pick? When have they ever gone into a lottery and came out with "phew. That is exactly why we did this"?  or even "thank gosh we didn't go down"?  Joe Johnson? When they were supposed to be 8th and got 8th?

The lottery never helps the Celtics. They have never gone into it and come away with any kind of advantage over other teams. They have never won, or even moved up, in the lottery. They have only lost the lottery.

Plus this team was far too good, even early on, for a top 6 pick. This team was looking at maybe 9th at best. Frank Kaminsky. Whoop de doo.
assuming the above is a real question and not simply a snarky over generalizaiton, by good pick, do you mean "top 6"? (since bird was taken at #6, it is reasonable to extend "good pick" this far out.)

if so, then a 5 minute search on the web would have shown you this:

2014 - 6th pick
2007 - 5th pick
1997 - 3rd pick & 6th pick
1996 - 6th pick
1986 - 2nd pick
1980 - 1st pick, traded down to 3rd pick

1978 - 6th pick

Hold on, here.  We're forgetting one very important detail in this discussion - are we talking about doing well in the lottery with our own picks, or those of another team's, because it looks a lot worse for us, believe it or not, if we're just looking at our own picks.

In 1980, after that dumbass owner of ours traded Tom Barker (whoever that is, lol ;D) and 3 FIRST ROUND PICKS in the 1979 draft for Bob McAdoo :o. There are simply not enough facepalms to illustrate how stupid that move was, especially since those picks ultimately ended up as 3, 9, and 21 in a draft with Bill Cartwright (who went at 3) and Sidney Moncrief (ugh), not to mention, Magic, obviously, in the top 5. 

Fortunately, Dick Vitale was in charge of the Pistons, lol ;D (are you serious?  Ohh, ohh... ::);D), and Red took him to the cleaners by trading McAdoo for two of Detroit's first round picks in 1980, which turned out to be the 1st, overall, and 13th, and as we all know, Auerbach then sent those picks to the Warriors for Parish and the 3rd pick, where we took McHale, but the overall point here is that our pick did not win the top pick in 1980, nor could it have given our record after Bird's first season.

Similarly, in 1984, after winning the title, Red traded Gerald Henderson to the Sonics for THEIR 1986 first rounder, and, as Arnold (I always thought it was funny that Cousy called him Arnold ;D) had hoped, Seattle found themselves in the basement at the end of the 85-86 season, winding up in the lottery, and we got the 2nd overall pick, so, again, that wasn't OUR pick, and, again, how could it have been when we won 67 games and a title that year. 

In addition, our 1986 first rounder had been traded with Max in 84-85 to get Walton from the Clippers, and I've always wondered two things about that trade - 1). if we'd traded Max after 1984 instead of 1985 when his value was never higher other than after the 1981 finals due to his great game 7 performance against the Lakers, could we have gotten Walton a year earlier, and if so, does that mean a 3-peat from 84-86 (obviously we would have needed more firepower from the backcourt, as well, but you get the idea)?  We'd probably have had to include a first rounder in such a trade, so let's say ours from 1985, instead of 86, meaning that we'd have the 2nd and 24th picks in the 1986 draft, which brings me to number 2). Do we take Mark Price at 24, giving us Len Bias and Price in one draft? :o Holy sh!t.  We wouldn't have needed Sichting, anymore, so he could have been traded for a 1st rounder of whatever, but even if we'd won close to, if not, 70 games in 86-87 with Price and Bias being our first two off the bench :o, we would have had the 23rd instead of the 22nd pick in 87.  I don't think that San Antonio, which had the Lakers' pick after handing over, I mean, trading ::), Mychal Thompson to LA at the 87 deadline, would have taken Reggie Lewis at said spot, meaning that we could have rebuilt on the fly and gotten our next core in place to take over from DJ and Danny (who probably just goes back to his bench role) down the road, while at the same time giving us the best bench in the league in Price, Lewis, and Bias for the present.  A title run from 84-88, etc., doesn't seem out of the question, and history would have been very different, imo.  WOW :o. Sorry for the tangent.

Offline Celtics18

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11688
  • Tommy Points: 1469
I know people love to say/see these statements but it doesn't make it any more sensible when a great player says it. It is EXTREMELY rare for a team to skip the middle and then win the chip, it just doesn't jive with reality no matter who says it! You don't go from the bottom to a title except for maybe a couple teams in history!
I don't think people are saying to skip the middle. They just want to reach the middle with a star already on board.

If you reach the middle with a bunch of nobodies, like on our team, to peak in the middle. If you reach the middle with some great young talent, you work your way up from there as they develop.

So what Cousy says IS sensible. His point is that you need the stars. Without the stars, you will have to be happy with annual first round knockouts.

He also never said he was willing to 'tank'. He just said it is better to be at the bottom than the middle. Contextually, it is clear that he meant this in the case of a team without stars.

Harsh. 
DKC Seventy-Sixers:

PG: G. Hill/D. Schroder
SG: C. Lee/B. Hield/T. Luwawu
SF:  Giannis/J. Lamb/M. Kuzminskas
PF:  E. Ilyasova/J. Jerebko/R. Christmas
C:    N. Vucevic/K. Olynyk/E. Davis/C. Jefferson

Offline Tr1boy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27260
  • Tommy Points: 867
Tommy disagrees. I agree with Tommy.

That is sort of a shady way to build an organization.  The basketball gods will punish you. Just look at the 76ers