If Embiid were to become available and Celtic doctors looked him over and said, "He's definitely done for this season but afterward we have no reason to think he won't have a normal career from a health perspective," how much would you be willing to trade for him, if anything?
I wouldn't believe them and would low ball it. Maybe James Young a 2nd and a late first. And Ko. Maybe
I'd trade a first round pick for him, easy.
I understand the high risk, but with plenty of first round picks to spare, I'd be willing to take that gamble.
Well, the assumption in the question asked was that the celtics medical staff clears him and predicts a clean bill of health going forward, which is why I said the rest of our Nets picks. IF we assume he's healthy long term after the surgery , then he's totally worth all those picks and more. He's the mythical superstar big man celtics nation has been dreaming of.
hpantazo, mythical is the right word because you don't address any of the points I made above. Even if healthy you have a raw, no longer exceptionally young, entirely inexperienced, questionably motivated and conditioned guy coming off a 2 1/2 year layoff. At this stage there is no reason to project Embiid to be a stud NBA Center. He was always a boom or bust prospect and the negative factors above continue to increase that bust chance.
The best "comps" for Embiid are Upshaw and Noel.
A healthy, 19 year old Noel would have been the #1 pick overall in 2013. The only problem was a one-off injury that was going to take him out for the season, one that he was fully expected to recover from. The guy averaged 10/10 and 4 blocks per game at Kentucky. No attitude problem, no conditioning problem, considered more polished than Embiid - if slightly less upside - and a limited layoff. He dropped to 6th in the draft.
Robert Upshaw was a problem child - drugs, kicked off teams, questionable conditioning, a bad seed. But undoubtedly he had (has) massive talent. Averaged 11/8 and 4 blocks per game and was 21 years old. He went undrafted. In short, at some point other issues like attitude, conditioning and age outweigh "potential".
Another way to look at it is look at Frank Kaminsky. People don't talk about Kaminsky's potential when drafting him. They talk about his ability to contribute immediately with limited upside due to his age. Embiid will probably be older than Kaminsky when he plays his first meaningful NBA game. Embiid has far more potential but Kaminsky has far, far more polish to his game. Kaminsky went 9th this year. Embiid wouldn't be drafted above Kaminsky.
This doesn't mean that Embiid can't or won't be a star. But it does mean his prospects for being one are significantly less than they were and you have to re-evaluate his worth to calculate all of the additional risk factors that have come up the past two years. Embiid will be almost 23 before he plays his first meaningful game in the NBA. He averaged 11/8 with 3 blocks per game at Kansas. Given that his age, injury history and length of layoff all are worse than Noel, he's got to be worth less than the #6 pick. He no longer carries the value of a top 5 and not even a top 10 pick anymore. As such, giving away the farm wouldn't make any sense - it's a massive overpay.