Finally! Danny admits his mistake with Marcus Banks 2.0 and moves him. Time to move on.
That's what we've been telling you for the whole year, move on! Yet your infatuation and persistence with name dropping "Marcus Banks 2.0" has been undeterred.
You still haven't told me why he isn't Banks 2.0. Hes Banks with a poor man TA's defense. Apparently I'm not the only one who thinks so since the Celtics are going to give him away to move up. Randle recently WOWED people in his workout in LA. I don't like saying the Lakers have a better future, it pains me. But Danny screwed up bad. It worked out even better that he missed all of last year too. Thats a good thing. It didn't hurt his value one bit and gave him an opportunity to really grow and adjust. He's going to have a better season than Banks 2.0. Better career too when Banks 2.0 plays with Banks 1.0 in China in 4 years.
In what parallel universe is this true?
The same universe where he is still rated as a higher prospect in execs eyes than Banks 2.0 is. Its called reality. Randle is just a much better player overall. Can't teach his post moves or size.
His size?! He's undersized for a PF, and he can't play defense in a game that's placing a premium on two way players. As of right now, Smart is more valuable and the fact you would even suggest Randle is just adds to the reasons why we don't think your actually a Celtic fan.
Smart can be the centerpiece of a Cousins trade, along with a Brooklyn pick or two. Randle couldn't be. That's a horrendous statement.
Apparently someone isn't paying attention to recent rumors. Randle IS the deal breaker for the Lakers. What did Banks 2.0 do last year to make him better than Randle? Its like a stock. Randle didn't do anything to help or hurt his stock from last year, Banks 2.0 plummeted.
well, for one thing, smart actually played in more than a single, solitary game, something randle did not accomplish. hard to get much smaller samples sizes than this, isnt it?
please, statements such as this make your arguments look like card houses....so absurdly easy to knock down. your points are better served by not being extreme and by respecting the counter points others may raise.
also, honestly, as a fellow poster here at cb, your repeated use of the trite, shallow, and midleading term of "bank 2.0" is not being viewed as witty by other readers. the usage opens you up to possible ridicule and detracts from the good points that you do make. as a friendly suggestion, i think it is about time you put this one to rest.
Topic: Stein:whispers getting louder c's could trade smart to move up to high lottery (Read 20102 times)