Author Topic: If Kaminsky falls to 16, we have to take him, right?  (Read 5381 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

If Kaminsky falls to 16, we have to take him, right?
« on: June 22, 2015, 12:07:16 PM »

Offline jaketwice

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1384
  • Tommy Points: 102
I mean, at 16, there's unlikely to be anyone who will, overall, be a better pro, available. Admittedly, we would have an extremely weird, almost defenseless roster - but I think we would be looking to make a trade at that point.

Thoughts?

Re: If Kaminsky falls to 16, we have to take him, right?
« Reply #1 on: June 22, 2015, 12:11:10 PM »

Offline Evantime34

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11942
  • Tommy Points: 764
  • Eagerly Awaiting the Next Fantasy Draft
Yeah I think so. I'd probably rather have Portis, but of the guys who probably would be available I don't see anyone better.
DKC:  Rockets
CB Draft: Memphis Grizz
Players: Klay Thompson, Jabari Parker, Aaron Gordon
Next 3 picks: 4.14, 4.15, 4.19

Re: If Kaminsky falls to 16, we have to take him, right?
« Reply #2 on: June 22, 2015, 12:13:14 PM »

Offline Denis998

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3308
  • Tommy Points: 388
  • Rutgers '17
Portis Portis Portis. I have him at around 12 on my personal draft board. He will be perfect

Re: If Kaminsky falls to 16, we have to take him, right?
« Reply #3 on: June 22, 2015, 12:17:00 PM »

Offline Geo123

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1470
  • Tommy Points: 33
No he doesn't fit a need at all.   If that happens and we still have the pick look to trade it for someone looking for a stretch 4.  BTW I would rather have Portis also. ....

Re: If Kaminsky falls to 16, we have to take him, right?
« Reply #4 on: June 22, 2015, 12:18:06 PM »

Offline colincb

  • NCE
  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5095
  • Tommy Points: 501
Doubt he does fall that far or that there's anyone better if he does, so yes.

Re: If Kaminsky falls to 16, we have to take him, right?
« Reply #5 on: June 22, 2015, 12:19:40 PM »

Offline D.o.s.

  • NCE
  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14061
  • Tommy Points: 1239
Defenseless roster?

We're looking for a new assistant coach, right?
At least a goldfish with a Lincoln Log on its back goin' across your floor to your sock drawer has a miraculous connotation to it.

Re: If Kaminsky falls to 16, we have to take him, right?
« Reply #6 on: June 22, 2015, 12:20:05 PM »

Offline jaketwice

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1384
  • Tommy Points: 102
Doubt he does fall that far or that there's anyone better if he does, so yes.

NBAdraft.net has him at 17.

Re: If Kaminsky falls to 16, we have to take him, right?
« Reply #7 on: June 22, 2015, 12:20:52 PM »

Offline Celtics18

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11688
  • Tommy Points: 1469
Doubt he's there at sixteen, but if he is, he'd probably be hard to pass up. 
DKC Seventy-Sixers:

PG: G. Hill/D. Schroder
SG: C. Lee/B. Hield/T. Luwawu
SF:  Giannis/J. Lamb/M. Kuzminskas
PF:  E. Ilyasova/J. Jerebko/R. Christmas
C:    N. Vucevic/K. Olynyk/E. Davis/C. Jefferson

Re: If Kaminsky falls to 16, we have to take him, right?
« Reply #8 on: June 22, 2015, 12:28:53 PM »

Offline ThaPreacher

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1011
  • Tommy Points: 174
  • THA PREACHER
Frank the tank is too good to be there at 16. If he was Danny would acquire him as another asset
 Probably mean Sullinger and or Olynek would be gone on a larger deal
"Just do what you do best."  -Red Auerbach-

Re: If Kaminsky falls to 16, we have to take him, right?
« Reply #9 on: June 22, 2015, 12:36:16 PM »

Offline Ilikesports17

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8721
  • Tommy Points: 854
Doubt he does fall that far or that there's anyone better if he does, so yes.

NBAdraft.net has him at 17.
That draft has some weird picks in it. I wont pretend to have the insider knowledge they have but Lyles at 8, Oubre at 25, Hunter at 30 all seem pretty questionable

Re: If Kaminsky falls to 16, we have to take him, right?
« Reply #10 on: June 22, 2015, 12:57:26 PM »

Offline krumeto

  • Al Horford
  • Posts: 476
  • Tommy Points: 72
Splash brothers 2.0. - Sunshine and Frank the Tank.

Seriously though, Frank is good. I would not trade up for him, but if he falls to 16 he will be a steal.
"We do so many defensive drills in practice, I come home and I'm putting the press on my woman, denying her the ball.
Y'all are laughing, but it's sad. I go home and deny the wing."

Re: If Kaminsky falls to 16, we have to take him, right?
« Reply #11 on: June 22, 2015, 01:08:18 PM »

Offline Celtics4ever

  • NCE
  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20090
  • Tommy Points: 1331
I hope not.   He would be fine on offense, he is nifty and can shoot.   I think he will struggle some will NBA athletes and on D.

Re: If Kaminsky falls to 16, we have to take him, right?
« Reply #12 on: June 22, 2015, 01:53:57 PM »

Offline jay

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1359
  • Tommy Points: 51
I would like to see Frank or Portis.  If both are gone, I would go Justin Anderson.  Then try to trade 28/45 and move up to the low-20s and get Jarrel Martin.

Even if we do get Portis or Frank at 16, I would like to see Danny move up to the low-20s if Anderson is still on board.

Re: If Kaminsky falls to 16, we have to take him, right?
« Reply #13 on: June 22, 2015, 05:52:43 PM »

Offline crownontherocks

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1528
  • Tommy Points: 86
The Knicks could select Frank Kaminsky at four in Thursday's draft, according to Sean Deveney of the Sporting News.

Re: If Kaminsky falls to 16, we have to take him, right?
« Reply #14 on: June 22, 2015, 05:56:37 PM »

Offline rondohondo

  • NCE
  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10764
  • Tommy Points: 1196
The Knicks could select Frank Kaminsky at four in Thursday's draft, according to Sean Deveney of the Sporting News.
they might trade down for him, no way they pick him #4