0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
Wojnarowski also gives some credence to previous reports of a Butler-Derrick Rose feud first outlined by Dan Bernstein. In between bullying multiple women in the Chicago media for no apparent reason, Bernstein reported there was tension between Butler and Rose in Game 6 of the Bulls' second round playoff series loss to the Cleveland Cavaliers. Rose was increasingly passive offensively in the second half, attempting just four shots while Butler attempted 12 over the final two quarters.Bernstein has a history of harboring an anti-Rose agenda, and Butler and Rose have certainly showed no outward signs of a falling out. Still, it's worth noting that Wojnarowski wrote Butler and Rose "need to come to a greater understanding about how to best co-exist on the floor." There's a lot left open for interpretation there.
Someone should tell Woj that if the Bulls give Butler a maximum qualifying offer, then the minimum length of an offer sheet increases by one year, so that the earliest he can become an unrestricted free agent if he signs an offer is 2018.
Quote from: LooseCannon on June 16, 2015, 08:32:14 PMSomeone should tell Woj that if the Bulls give Butler a maximum qualifying offer, then the minimum length of an offer sheet increases by one year, so that the earliest he can become an unrestricted free agent if he signs an offer is 2018.Beat me to it. He can turn down a max qualifying offer if he wants, but he can't leave Chicago any time soon. I'm going with the theory that he wants a max deal including max raises, and this story is actually designed to pressure the Bulls into offering that, as opposed to something with 4.5% raises.
How will this affect the Bulls?
Sounds like an opportunity to dangle one of those cheeky poison pill contracts like Houston gave Asik & Lin.