If Indiana really wants Payne, they're not in a strong position. They either make a deal, or pick him 5-10 spots higher than necessary.
Do they want Payne, or Payne and another pick?
Obviously they can strong-arm us, but if they are the ones trying to move down we can talk to Utah at #12 and call their bluff.
They'd only pick him about 3 spots higher than necessary. He's really good -- definitely worthy of being the second PG taken in the draft.
He's not getting drafted in the 12-15 range unless there is a trade. Utah (Burke + Exum), Phoenix (Knight + Bledsoe), OKC (Westbrook), Atlanta (Teague + Schroder) are not picking a PG. So #16 is exactly as good as #11 if they want him. He's only top 15 in theory if Indiana doesn't take him, unless one of those teams makes another move.
Do you know how deep OKC's team is? They will absolutely go BPA. I wouldnt be surprised if the Hawks did the same. Furthermore, in each of the last four drafts, there has been at least one draft night trade involving picks 12-15, so it's rather likely that the draft order for those slots will not hold this year as well.
If Indy traded back to us, I continue to voice my skepticism that they could acquire Payne at 16.
Yeah, with his draft record, watch Presti take Upshaw right out from underneath us. Ugh.
As for Indiana, it doesn't surprise me that Bird likes Payne, because he's a Larry Bird type of a player in terms of being a great talent at a small school. If he trades down and still gets Payne, I could see him taking Harvey, Upshaw, or Wright, as well. Deng

. Of course, he could always just take Payne at 11, so...
Btw, is/was Utah actually interested in trading the 13th pick for AB, or was that just a piece of fan fiction, so to speak, haha

? The Jazz cannot possibly be that dumb, can they?