I was pulling for the Clips (I don't really get the animosity toward them on here), but if this pushes DJ toward leaving...I'd be thrilled. Great series though, we won't forget this one for quite some time.
You don't get the animosity? Are you kidding? Doc cost us DJ and Bledsoe.
Uhhmmmm how did Doc do that to us???
As I recall Doc wanted KG on the Clippers and proposed a trade that was KG for DJ but was blocked by Stern at the time.
Sooooo yeahh...
Stern blocked it? I'm pretty positive that's not how it happened at all. If I remember correctly, Doc wanted KG, Ainge said he'd only do it if Jordan was coming back to us, and then the deal pretty much died. Doc wanted KG, but not at the expense of Deandre Jordan
I think Stern blocked it b/c we traded Doc, said we couldn't trade with them for a season. Honestly don't remember how it all went down but it was pretty shady.
Doc was unwilling to part with DJ, but they were still trying to do a coach and player swap with KG somehow. That's when Stern blocked it only allowing Doc to be traded for their first round pick.
Curse you David Stern.
He kept CP3 off the Lakers , If CP3 was on Lakers , Jackson and Howard would have stayed there with him.....and the Lakers working on banner 18 or 19 by now.
He saved the Celtics and league from another 10 years of Laker dominance.
I don't understand why otherwise smart people refuse to understand what actually went down with the Chris Paul to Laker deal. IT WAS NOT STERN THAT NIXED THE DEAL, IT WAS THE OWNERS OF THE NBA led by Cuban and the owner of the Cavaliers. At that time New Orleans was owned by the NBA. The GM had made the deal, Stern in his capacity as talking for the owners not in his capacity as Commissioner did what the owners of New Orleans (NBA) wanted an NIXED THE deal. Left to Stern that deal was a done deal. Thank Cuban and not Stern.
Regardless of who it was, it's still amazing when you look at that whole situation in hindsight...that the owners and commissioner came to an agreement to not allow that deal simply because they thought it'd be unfair to the rest of the league, that the Lakers would basically be TOO good and continue to be a dominating franchise
No, the veto wasn't about the Lakers, though they were a major reason for the grumbling. It was about maximizing the value of the New Orleans franchise - a team that every owner had a stake in - before selling it.
Taking on Lamar Odom, Kevin Martin, and Luis Scola made the team mediocre at best, and probably worse given Odom's flameout and Scola's decline. And it added lots more long-term salary commitment to boot. Terrible move for a team they're trying to sell. The deal they got from the Clippers was a much better move for their situation.
...oh yeah and the veto saved Houston's future too, or they'd have capped out on Pau Gasol and (reportedly) Nene. Not nearly as good a core as Harden and Howard.