I don't care who we get if guys don't buy into the system and play their role their not gonna fit in. See all star caliber guard rondo and untapped athletic potential Jeff green. They were good players but didn't fit this system. Rondo controlled too much and Jeff took naps. This team is built around... You guessed it team. Whomever we get they'll be evaluated first as to whether or not that player fits for this team. If he doesn't we won't go after him.
Wait, wait, so let me get this straight: You think that, if we focus on players who believe that the team is more important than the individual and that, if they do their jobs correctly, the team will win, even if few of the individuals are actual superstars? And you believe that a stable front office and one that knows what to look for and understands the concept of "value" is more important than over-paying for a superstar free agent? And all this can happen for a cold weather team?
No way this could happen. It's not like there are any other New England teams that embrace that philosophy who have been massively successful over the past decade.
Mike
The New England team with that philosophy, and the NBA team from Texas with a similar philosophy, have both had the benefit of the best coach in their respective sports paired with a top player at the most important position in their respective sports.
The philosophy probably made a big difference in each case, especially in helping the teams sustain their success. But what made it all possible in both cases was the pairing of the historically great coach with the historically great player.
We have the great coach, that appears to be widely agreed upon (in the same way that the Sixers have a great player in Noel). The question is how to get the great player. It's still uncertain how good Smart, Young, Sullinger and Olynyk will be. It's pretty clear how good IT, Bradley, ET, Crowder, Jerebko and Zeller will be. Point being, none of them are stars. I think if the question is, would you rather make the playoffs and get the 15th or 16th pick or miss and the get the 1st pick, I'd agree with you that calculated losing (tanking) is the way to go. But no matter how fast Ainge worked this offseason, we were never going to be as bad as New York, Philly, LA, Minnesota, etc. That's because we already have the great coach, and I would take the great coach over our worst (or best) case draft scenario being the 3rd best odds (LAL putridity) vs. the 7-10th best odds (think Orlando-Utah type teams). And so, if the question is would I rather make the playoffs (15th or 16th pick) or miss (pick somewhere in 7-10), I'd take the playoffs. It will be great exposure for our best asset (Coach Stevens), more money for Wyc and Co. incentivizing them to spend when a great player comes on the market, and theoretically a development accelerator for Smart, Sully, Oly, etc. To me, all those things make for the fastest way towards obtaining that great player.