Whatever Ainge professes publicly, he knows that as assets go, the 10th pick is better than the 15th. We have no shot at winning that first round series. He knows this. He'd rather have the 10th pick than the 15th. The more valuable asset is more important to him than getting blown out in 4 meaningless games despite the pablum he puts out for the masses.
Again, pure speculation. Can you put a number on the value between the 10th and the 15th pick? Can you put a number on the value of playoff experience? Because if you use the word "value", you have to subtract the second number from the first.
Saying that the 10th pick is a better asset than the 15th would be speculation only in your mind. It's pure fact.
As to the value of playoff experience, we're still in the asset acquisition / churning roster phase. I don't think it matters much with this present bunch, any of whom he'd ship out tomorrow if he could get more valuable assets.
Ainge's method of reaching his ultimate goal is not necessarily Stevens/the players goal. If making the playoffs each and every year were the goal, he could have kept PP and KG an extra year and merely made the playoffs (at least last year). I believe that Ainge's personnel moves were to get future assets at the expense of present record, and that he intended to get high lotto talent for two years. Stevens goal is to win every game with whatever talent Ainge happens to leave him with. Stevens immediate goal has not been Ainge's immediate goal, and Stevens was so good at coaching an ever changing roster, which, on paper, Ainge decimated multiple times over, that he's now going to make the playoffs. Good for Stevens, good for the players; not as good for the Celtics/Ainge or this year's draft asset.
Look,it doesn't matter whether you choose to believe that Ainge wants to make the playoffs this year, and that I choose to believe that he'd rather have the 10th pick (with the way he decimated the roster, I believe Ainge was hoping for a top 5 pick). His actions (trade-wise) indicate that he was going for a dumpster dive this year. When actions don't align with his words, I believe the actions.
This is really about whether you think 4 playoff games with a roster that is still undergoing roster churn and the 15th pick is better for the team going forward than the 10th pick. It's that simple really. I'd prefer the 10th pick. It is objectively the better asset going forward.
I'd bet anything that more than half the players on this year's team won't be here in two years, so playoff experience for them is of little importance to the Celtics. We have no franchise guys. All of them are trade bait. A higher pick during the first two years of a rebuild is of greater value than playoff experience for a majority of guys who won't be around here when we next truly contend (unless your idea of contention is sneaking into the playoffs with a sub-.500 record).