Just a difference in opinion, man. TP. I was on board with getting Asik, too. With the right surrounding players, a defensive anchor manning the middle can have an overwhelming impact. It's I why continued to see Kevin Garnett as the most valuable player on the Celtics well past his prime (and while others were inaccurately throwing the label at Rondo). KG's defensive impact still made all the difference. Andrew Bogut doesn't get enough credit for the Warriors success. Tyson Chandler didn't get enough credit for the Dallas championship. Adding Biyombo to this 32-46 win team isn't going to springboard it into contention. Obviously not. We have gaping holes everywhere on this roster. But as long as we have competent scorers on the team, we can afford a Biyombo or Asik.
While I do agree with you overall, I don't really agree with the KG comparison. Sure KG had a huge defensive impact for Boston through those years, but even in his later Celtics years he was never a one dimensional player.
Even late in his Cetlics career, KG was still an excellent rebounder, (he averaged something like 13 RPG in his final playoff run with Boston), an elite passer for a big, and one of the best shooters in the entire league from midrange. He was also an >80% FT shooter through almost his entire tenure with Boston.
While KG was no longer dominant offensively in his later years, and may not have even been a 'plus' offensive player in some of those seasons, he was always good enough on that end of the floor to keep the defense honest. No defense ever dared to leave KG open, not even in his last year as a Celtic.
Not really the case with Biyombo - he's really no threat offensively, and the defense can for the most part completely ignore his presence.
Id still like to see him here though - in a bench role. Role players like Biyombo can be very effective on the bench when you're going up against opposing teams second units, and he's young enough that he still has a tone of upside. That along makes it worthwhile.