Wow surprised some would not offer Butler the max. To those that hope Danny can find the next Butler in two years time....you are more optimistic than I
I suppose I was dreaming with this thread anyways, all Chicago has to do is find a taker for Gibson this off season which shouldn't be too tough.
Butler is not a franchise player. Worst thing you can do I overpay for a guy just to get a guy. Ask the pistons how signing good players for great money worked out for them.
The best teams have the best players and/or are not overpaying guys.
Yes, but when the salary cap goes up it may not be considered an overpay. Butler also plays a position that is shallow around the league.
The cap suddenly rising 20 million/year is not going to benefit teams that are still trying to obtain stars. It will benefit teams that already have stars because they won't have cap pressure and they can even add an extra star with the sudden cap space. That is why it could be argued the best strategy from now thru the offseason for the Celtics is to do whatever is necessary to secure stars or at the very least competent players on the roster before every team in the league suddenly has cap space.
Of course, other teams know this and that is why all the top FAs will be kept by their original teams even if they have to pay the luxury tax one year to do it. The Celtics won't be in the running for any of the top guys like Green, Dragic, Butler, Millsap, Jordan etc. They have to either clearly overpay for somebody (Kanter at the max, anybody?), spread the money around to multiple smaller FAs, not spend the money, or work the trade market.
That is what I think they're doing with Lawson. He doesn't fit a rebuild but he's an asset that they thought maybe Denver was looking to sell low on. The other possibility is that someone becomes so disgruntled that they force their way to a trade. That should be what Celtics fans are hoping for because in terms of draft picks the Celts can outbid most teams.