Author Topic: Austin Rivers  (Read 62721 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Austin Rivers
« Reply #30 on: January 10, 2015, 04:09:34 PM »

Offline aingeforthree

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2013
  • Tommy Points: 134
Austin Rivers is garbage.  He's a salary dump here.  If he gets minutes, it's to help us lose games and improve lottery position.

Seriously, he's one of the worst guards in the NBA.
What is the downside though? Would you rather have seen Salmons on the court? Salmons is on the downside of his career, Rivers could potentially improve under a new system. The worst that could happen is he plays like garbage and we don't pick up his QO next year. That would leave us in the exact same place we would have been with Salmons. I don't see any downside.

He costs more money, which is more Wyc's issue than mine.

I'm just amused to see people suggesting he's a good player, or that he is worth a first rounder. That's just bizarre to me.  People should be realistic about how useless Rivers has been.

Teams don't decline the 4th year option on a lottery pick very frequently.  New Orleans must be thrilled to clear his salary.  We should be getting compensated by them for taking him on.

What's his contract , 2 million ?  Why are they thrilled about clearing that ?

Low risk contract to take on, IMO.  22 years of age.  Get a coach in there that knows how to put him in a position to succeed.  Still really only a Senior in college, if that.

Re: Austin Rivers
« Reply #31 on: January 10, 2015, 04:09:51 PM »

Offline Donoghus

  • Global Moderator
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33114
  • Tommy Points: 1742
  • What a Pub Should Be
Austin Rivers brings nothing to the table. 


2010 CB Historical Draft - Best Overall Team

Re: Austin Rivers
« Reply #32 on: January 10, 2015, 04:10:33 PM »

Offline Evantime34

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11942
  • Tommy Points: 764
  • Eagerly Awaiting the Next Fantasy Draft
Austin Rivers is garbage.  He's a salary dump here.  If he gets minutes, it's to help us lose games and improve lottery position.

Seriously, he's one of the worst guards in the NBA.
What is the downside though? Would you rather have seen Salmons on the court? Salmons is on the downside of his career, Rivers could potentially improve under a new system. The worst that could happen is he plays like garbage and we don't pick up his QO next year. That would leave us in the exact same place we would have been with Salmons. I don't see any downside.

He costs more money, which is more Wyc's issue than mine.

I'm just amused to see people suggesting he's a good player, or that he is worth a first rounder. That's just bizarre to me.  People should be realistic about how useless Rivers has been.

Teams don't decline the 4th year option on a lottery pick very frequently.  New Orleans must be thrilled to clear his salary.  We should be getting compensated by them for taking him on.
Yeah I don't think that he is worth a first. However, I do think he is worth more to us than a guy  who we would immediately cut after the trade went through.

For that matter I'd rather see him on the court than Thornton (who doesn't have a future with this team) or Pressey (who I'm not a fan of)
DKC:  Rockets
CB Draft: Memphis Grizz
Players: Klay Thompson, Jabari Parker, Aaron Gordon
Next 3 picks: 4.14, 4.15, 4.19

Re: Austin Rivers
« Reply #33 on: January 10, 2015, 04:13:22 PM »

Offline KeepRondo

  • NCE
  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5161
  • Tommy Points: 215
I think some people are still holding a grudge against Doc. It's one thing to say you don't like a player's game but some of these posts sound so bitter. I mean, can we at least see Austin play a few games under Stevens before we start calling him garbage?

Re: Austin Rivers
« Reply #34 on: January 10, 2015, 04:14:10 PM »

Offline Jiri Welsch

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3067
  • Tommy Points: 365
Maybe if we take on Rivers his dad will agree to coach LAC out of playoff contention for a lottery pick coming our way

Re: Austin Rivers
« Reply #35 on: January 10, 2015, 04:14:47 PM »

Online Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 63539
  • Tommy Points: -25456
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
Austin Rivers is garbage.  He's a salary dump here.  If he gets minutes, it's to help us lose games and improve lottery position.

Seriously, he's one of the worst guards in the NBA.
What is the downside though? Would you rather have seen Salmons on the court? Salmons is on the downside of his career, Rivers could potentially improve under a new system. The worst that could happen is he plays like garbage and we don't pick up his QO next year. That would leave us in the exact same place we would have been with Salmons. I don't see any downside.

He costs more money, which is more Wyc's issue than mine.

I'm just amused to see people suggesting he's a good player, or that he is worth a first rounder. That's just bizarre to me.  People should be realistic about how useless Rivers has been.

Teams don't decline the 4th year option on a lottery pick very frequently.  New Orleans must be thrilled to clear his salary.  We should be getting compensated by them for taking him on.

What's his contract , 2 million ?  Why are they thrilled about clearing that ?

Low risk contract to take on, IMO.  22 years of age.  Get a coach in there that knows how to put him in a position to succeed.  Still really only a Senior in college, if that.

Even billionaires don't like paying millions for trash.


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER... AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!

Re: Austin Rivers
« Reply #36 on: January 10, 2015, 04:14:51 PM »

Offline bknova

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1103
  • Tommy Points: 73
It was John Salmons or Austin Rivers.  Not really understanding why this is a conversation. 

Re: Austin Rivers
« Reply #37 on: January 10, 2015, 04:16:15 PM »

Online Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 63539
  • Tommy Points: -25456
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
I think some people are still holding a grudge against Doc. It's one thing to say you don't like a player's game but some of these posts sound so bitter. I mean, can we at least see Austin play a few games under Stevens before we start calling him garbage?

He's a terrible player.

I'm actually fine with the way Doc left town.  It was in both parties' best interest.


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER... AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!

Re: Austin Rivers
« Reply #38 on: January 10, 2015, 04:16:30 PM »

Offline KeepRondo

  • NCE
  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5161
  • Tommy Points: 215
Austin Rivers is garbage.  He's a salary dump here.  If he gets minutes, it's to help us lose games and improve lottery position.

Seriously, he's one of the worst guards in the NBA.
What is the downside though? Would you rather have seen Salmons on the court? Salmons is on the downside of his career, Rivers could potentially improve under a new system. The worst that could happen is he plays like garbage and we don't pick up his QO next year. That would leave us in the exact same place we would have been with Salmons. I don't see any downside.

He costs more money, which is more Wyc's issue than mine.

I'm just amused to see people suggesting he's a good player, or that he is worth a first rounder. That's just bizarre to me.  People should be realistic about how useless Rivers has been.

Teams don't decline the 4th year option on a lottery pick very frequently.  New Orleans must be thrilled to clear his salary.  We should be getting compensated by them for taking him on.

What's his contract , 2 million ?  Why are they thrilled about clearing that ?

Low risk contract to take on, IMO.  22 years of age.  Get a coach in there that knows how to put him in a position to succeed.  Still really only a Senior in college, if that.

Even billionaires don't like paying millions for trash.
do you dislike the Rivers family or something?

Re: Austin Rivers
« Reply #39 on: January 10, 2015, 04:16:54 PM »

Offline SHAQATTACK

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 37847
  • Tommy Points: 3033
Austin Rivers brings nothing to the table.

Yup ......

Please noooooooooooo.

Re: Austin Rivers
« Reply #40 on: January 10, 2015, 04:18:17 PM »

Offline KeepRondo

  • NCE
  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5161
  • Tommy Points: 215
Austin Rivers brings nothing to the table.

Yup ......

Please noooooooooooo.
So do most of our current players.

Re: Austin Rivers
« Reply #41 on: January 10, 2015, 04:18:23 PM »

Offline SHAQATTACK

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 37847
  • Tommy Points: 3033
He sucks .
so?

Soooooooooooooo very very bad ......

No reason to bring him on this team

Re: Austin Rivers
« Reply #42 on: January 10, 2015, 04:18:50 PM »

Offline hpantazo

  • Tommy Heinsohn
  • *************************
  • Posts: 25355
  • Tommy Points: 2756
It was John Salmons or Austin Rivers.  Not really understanding why this is a conversation.

This. Between the two , Rivers is the better option based only on age, but either option sucked.

Re: Austin Rivers
« Reply #43 on: January 10, 2015, 04:19:18 PM »

Online Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 63539
  • Tommy Points: -25456
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
Austin Rivers is garbage.  He's a salary dump here.  If he gets minutes, it's to help us lose games and improve lottery position.

Seriously, he's one of the worst guards in the NBA.
What is the downside though? Would you rather have seen Salmons on the court? Salmons is on the downside of his career, Rivers could potentially improve under a new system. The worst that could happen is he plays like garbage and we don't pick up his QO next year. That would leave us in the exact same place we would have been with Salmons. I don't see any downside.

He costs more money, which is more Wyc's issue than mine.

I'm just amused to see people suggesting he's a good player, or that he is worth a first rounder. That's just bizarre to me.  People should be realistic about how useless Rivers has been.

Teams don't decline the 4th year option on a lottery pick very frequently.  New Orleans must be thrilled to clear his salary.  We should be getting compensated by them for taking him on.

What's his contract , 2 million ?  Why are they thrilled about clearing that ?

Low risk contract to take on, IMO.  22 years of age.  Get a coach in there that knows how to put him in a position to succeed.  Still really only a Senior in college, if that.

Even billionaires don't like paying millions for trash.
do you dislike the Rivers family or something?

Nope. I just think Doc's son stinks as an NBA player.  Is there any shred of evidence to support the argument that he's not one of the worst guards in the NBA?


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER... AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!

Re: Austin Rivers
« Reply #44 on: January 10, 2015, 04:20:00 PM »

Offline SHAQATTACK

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 37847
  • Tommy Points: 3033
Austin Rivers brings nothing to the table.

Yup ......

Please noooooooooooo.
So do most of our current players.

So let's not add to that list with a KID that is awful ......loll ....why ......I mean the vets are expiring .......why hire a nothing player !..

What can Docs kid do ?

ZIP