I don't think he should be blamed for anything. He's the best player on this team (though it does seem like SUlly is quickly improving). The problem is that the team as a whole is pretty bad. Rondo isn't a superstar level player who can win games by himself. He's an exceptional player with some major flaws. He's immensely skilled, but what he's immensely skilled (distributing, rebounding for a point guard) aren't really the most important attributes towards winning a championship. Stick him on a team of hall of famers that compliment his skills, you can have a really nice team with Rondo.
MAJOR exaggeration, but it's like having the world's greatest NFL kicker. If the team is garbage, he shouldn't be blamed. It's not his fault. He's still a great kicker. Rondo is a great passer regardless of the fact his team is bleh and "passing" isn't the most important NBA skill.
Here's where the bickering comes from. You have some fans here who liked to believe Rondo was a superstar talent that could raise the level of a team and lead them to the playoffs by himself. It's simply not true. Lots of debates stemmed from that. I myself have been vocal in saying that Rondo can't be the best player on a champion. Rondo's my favorite player on the team... I love that guy. But on the internet you're either all-in or all-out. I've been called a hater for pointing out the guy's flaws. I mean... I said the same stuff about Pierce, but Pierce was my favorite modern player of all time. It wasn't going to prevent me from admitting that Pierce wasn't on LeBron's level. Still... in the age of hyperbole everything is either the "best ever" or "worst ever". You can't admit that LeBron was better than Pierce without being a Pierce hater in the eyes of some.
So then you have fans who really disagree with everything I just said. They point out that 3 years ago in the 2012 Playoffs, Rondo did this and that... or claim that he was the best player 5 years ago in 2010... That stems more disagreement. That stems more bickering. It starts to slant everyone's view, because they are tired of arguing points they are convinced are right. On top of that you have fans who buy into the media idea that Ainge has been shopping Rondo for years... and you have fans who buy the company line that Ainge will never shop Rondo. That stems more disagreement. More people become bitter with one another. The snark goes off the charts.
I mean at the end of the day, Rondo is the most prominent figure on a terrible team in a big market. He's been both overrated and underrated. If the team was winning, it wouldn't matter as much... but we are in the thick of irrelevance and Rondo is at the head of it... that combined with the trade culture Ainge has fostered, the disagreement amongst fans and Rondo's impending free agency means you're going to hear people complaining about Rondo for at least a few more months.
Pretty accurate post.
Rondo is what he is - the best player on a terrible team who is never going to be more than a complementary player on a quality team, a passer - when he wants to be - whose offense is limited at best, and limited more now by his total inability to make a free throw. He's not a number one; never has been, never will be, and a game here and a game there doesn't change that, regardless of the protestations of his Celtics Blog fan club.
If Ainge wants to waste max money on that package, then I'll be at the forefront laughing at him. Again.
If Ainge wants to offer a legitimate contract - $15 to $17 million AAV - then fine. If Rondo wants more, he can walk with my thanks for what he contributed to the championships.
Refreshing to see people coming around to what some of us diagnosed years ago.