Author Topic: Do you agree with how Stevens is using Sully?  (Read 11094 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Do you agree with how Stevens is using Sully?
« Reply #30 on: November 04, 2014, 04:14:41 PM »

Offline kozlodoev

  • NCE
  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17914
  • Tommy Points: 1294
You haven't been looking hard enough, then.
Or he hasn't been here long enough. I will absolutely stipulate that trading Garnett and Pierce has made me grumpy in my old age ;)
"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."

Re: Do you agree with how Stevens is using Sully?
« Reply #31 on: November 04, 2014, 04:16:09 PM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19023
  • Tommy Points: 1834
Enough time? I don't think so, particularly for 22 year old who just began incorporating that into his game last year, shot selection is still something very correctable that comes with experience. He hasn't had enough of that yet.
That's something he should have been doing at 16. It's a bit of a luxury using NBA games as a skills academy.

You're a funny man.

Re: Do you agree with how Stevens is using Sully?
« Reply #32 on: November 04, 2014, 04:23:40 PM »

Offline kozlodoev

  • NCE
  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17914
  • Tommy Points: 1294
You're a funny man.
I may just be dumb here, but how many examples do you have for NBA players that learned skills from scratch during their NBA careers -- something that they never really did before, and didn't show any natural aptitude for. The closest I can think of is Kidd, but even he had 200+ college three pointers, shot 33% in his sophomore NBA year, and never looked back.
"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."

Re: Do you agree with how Stevens is using Sully?
« Reply #33 on: November 04, 2014, 04:35:27 PM »

Offline mgent

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7567
  • Tommy Points: 1962
Enough time? I don't think so, particularly for 22 year old who just began incorporating that into his game last year, shot selection is still something very correctable that comes with experience. He hasn't had enough of that yet.
That's something he should have been doing at 16. It's a bit of a luxury using NBA games as a skills academy.

Hate to break it to you, but Sullinger has been shooting 3s since middle school.
Philly:

Anderson Varejao    Tiago Splitter    Matt Bonner
David West    Kenyon Martin    Brad Miller
Andre Iguodala    Josh Childress    Marquis Daniels
Dwyane Wade    Leandro Barbosa
Kirk Hinrich    Toney Douglas   + the legendary Kevin McHale

Re: Do you agree with how Stevens is using Sully?
« Reply #34 on: November 04, 2014, 04:44:34 PM »

Offline LooseCannon

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11833
  • Tommy Points: 950
You're a funny man.
I may just be dumb here, but how many examples do you have for NBA players that learned skills from scratch during their NBA careers -- something that they never really did before, and didn't show any natural aptitude for. The closest I can think of is Kidd, but even he had 200+ college three pointers, shot 33% in his sophomore NBA year, and never looked back.

Spencer Hawes went 1-3 on threes in college, although he was known to have a solid mid-range game.  Channing Frye was 6-23 in four college seasons, then shot 28.6% in 70 shots over his first four NBA seasons, before exploding for 43.9% in 392 attempts in his fifth season.
"The worst thing that ever happened in sports was sports radio, and the internet is sports radio on steroids with lower IQs.” -- Brian Burke, former Toronto Maple Leafs senior adviser, at the 2013 MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference

Re: Do you agree with how Stevens is using Sully?
« Reply #35 on: November 04, 2014, 05:13:38 PM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19023
  • Tommy Points: 1834
You're a funny man.
I may just be dumb here, but how many examples do you have for NBA players that learned skills from scratch during their NBA careers -- something that they never really did before, and didn't show any natural aptitude for. The closest I can think of is Kidd, but even he had 200+ college three pointers, shot 33% in his sophomore NBA year, and never looked back.

This isn't a skills from scratch though, but something he had yet to fully implement into his game as an NBA player until recently (you know in a season after a back operation and then suffering an hand injury during the season).

But what you seemed to be alluding to was the shot selection bit, and sorry to tell you, but practically none of the NBA players are particularly good at that aspect when they arrive, so the "since 16 years old bit" is a bit absurd.
« Last Edit: November 04, 2014, 05:24:09 PM by BudweiserCeltic »

Re: Do you agree with how Stevens is using Sully?
« Reply #36 on: November 04, 2014, 05:21:32 PM »

Offline krumeto

  • Derrick White
  • Posts: 476
  • Tommy Points: 72
You're a funny man.
I may just be dumb here, but how many examples do you have for NBA players that learned skills from scratch during their NBA careers -- something that they never really did before, and didn't show any natural aptitude for. The closest I can think of is Kidd, but even he had 200+ college three pointers, shot 33% in his sophomore NBA year, and never looked back.
Chris Bosh comes immediately to mind. Last season he shot and made more 3s than his first 8 seasons combined.
"We do so many defensive drills in practice, I come home and I'm putting the press on my woman, denying her the ball.
Y'all are laughing, but it's sad. I go home and deny the wing."

Re: Do you agree with how Stevens is using Sully?
« Reply #37 on: November 04, 2014, 05:33:07 PM »

Offline guava_wrench

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9931
  • Tommy Points: 777
You're a funny man.
I may just be dumb here, but how many examples do you have for NBA players that learned skills from scratch during their NBA careers -- something that they never really did before, and didn't show any natural aptitude for. The closest I can think of is Kidd, but even he had 200+ college three pointers, shot 33% in his sophomore NBA year, and never looked back.
There are tons of guys who learned to hit 3's in the NBA. Look at all the D and 3 guys who were irrelevant until they learned to hit the 3.

And what does it even mean to learn from scratch? Guys who can hit midrange shots extend their range all the time.

Re: Do you agree with how Stevens is using Sully?
« Reply #38 on: November 04, 2014, 06:51:34 PM »

Offline hwangjini_1

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18383
  • Tommy Points: 2764
  • bammokja
I don't mind Sully shooting a three , he is not bad for a big....
Just out of curiousity, do you think Zach Randolph is "not bad" shooting the three, too? Because over his career, he's just .004 worse than Sullinger.

You know, the guy who did this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A13PKLR-HyY

and this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rh2fn01cngg

kozzy, absolutely love the clips. tp for posting them.

next, i understand your points on 3 pointers and largely agree, but as a small footnote, zach randolph is a stupid human being. sully is a smart human being. i hate seeing them compared.
I believe Gandhi is the only person who knew about real democracy — not democracy as the right to go and buy what you want, but democracy as the responsibility to be accountable to everyone around you. Democracy begins with freedom from hunger, freedom from unemployment, freedom from fear, and freedom from hatred.
- Vandana Shiva

Re: Do you agree with how Stevens is using Sully?
« Reply #39 on: November 04, 2014, 07:10:31 PM »

Offline D.o.s.

  • NCE
  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14061
  • Tommy Points: 1239
next, i understand your points on 3 pointers and largely agree, but as a small footnote, zach randolph is a stupid human being. sully is a smart human being. i hate seeing them compared.

You know this as a close friend of both, I assume?
At least a goldfish with a Lincoln Log on its back goin' across your floor to your sock drawer has a miraculous connotation to it.

Re: Do you agree with how Stevens is using Sully?
« Reply #40 on: November 04, 2014, 11:39:21 PM »

Offline kozlodoev

  • NCE
  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17914
  • Tommy Points: 1294
You're a funny man.
I may just be dumb here, but how many examples do you have for NBA players that learned skills from scratch during their NBA careers -- something that they never really did before, and didn't show any natural aptitude for. The closest I can think of is Kidd, but even he had 200+ college three pointers, shot 33% in his sophomore NBA year, and never looked back.
There are tons of guys who learned to hit 3's in the NBA. Look at all the D and 3 guys who were irrelevant until they learned to hit the 3.

And what does it even mean to learn from scratch? Guys who can hit midrange shots extend their range all the time.
Not sure which three and D guys you're referring to. James Posey shot .370 on 220 threes in his rookie season. Bruce Bowen shot .330 or better in all but one of his seasons.  Raja Bell, ~.340 over his firs ~100 shots.

If there are examples that illustrate your point, I either can't think of them, or they're an exception rather than the rule. Sure, players can improve marginally. Sullinger  needs way more than that.
"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."

Re: Do you agree with how Stevens is using Sully?
« Reply #41 on: November 05, 2014, 12:04:28 AM »

Offline LooseCannon

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11833
  • Tommy Points: 950
Not sure which three and D guys you're referring to. James Posey shot .370 on 220 threes in his rookie season. Bruce Bowen shot .330 or better in all but one of his seasons.  Raja Bell, ~.340 over his firs ~100 shots.

Possibly guys like Matt Barnes and Trevor Ariza.
"The worst thing that ever happened in sports was sports radio, and the internet is sports radio on steroids with lower IQs.” -- Brian Burke, former Toronto Maple Leafs senior adviser, at the 2013 MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference