Author Topic: Lakers pick up Boozer off waivers  (Read 7532 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Lakers pick up Boozer off waivers
« Reply #15 on: July 17, 2014, 05:50:56 PM »

Offline Lucky17

  • DKC Commish
  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16021
  • Tommy Points: 2352
Miss on LeBron
Miss on Dwight
Miss on Nash
Miss on Carmelo
Land on Boozer


I am throughly enjoying the universe's two finger salute to the purple and gold.
Are the two fingers on the same hand? :P

I think D.o.s. hails from the sceptered isle, so it's likely that they do. And he doesn't mean "Victory."

 ;D

"Looks like we got ourselves a reader."

Only Bruce Dickinson's liner notes.
DKC League is now on reddit!: http://www.reddit.com/r/dkcleague

Re: Lakers pick up Boozer off waivers
« Reply #16 on: July 17, 2014, 05:52:17 PM »

Offline D.o.s.

  • NCE
  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14061
  • Tommy Points: 1239
That's a Bill Hicks bit about a Waffle House in Tennessee. It is funny. It is not CB appropriate.

Up the Irons, though. For sure.
At least a goldfish with a Lincoln Log on its back goin' across your floor to your sock drawer has a miraculous connotation to it.

Re: Lakers pick up Boozer off waivers
« Reply #17 on: July 17, 2014, 05:56:39 PM »

Offline JohnBoy65

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 929
  • Tommy Points: 134
The lakers offseason is going so well they should hire D'Antoni

Re: Lakers pick up Boozer off waivers
« Reply #18 on: July 17, 2014, 06:05:29 PM »

Offline Mr October

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6129
  • Tommy Points: 247
Smart signing. Boozer immediately becomes far and away the best big man on the Lakers.

The Lalers desperately needed someone with some offensive skills. Jordan Hill, Ed Davis and Julius Randle wasn't going to work. Too many similar / combined limitations on the offensive end of the floor. They need someone with Boozer's jump-shooting and passing ability.

It'll stunt Julius Randle's growth since Boozer will takeup a lot of minutes.

If Randle can't earn those minutes by outplaying Boozer, he shouldn't get them.

I agree. Randle will, do just fine with 20 minutes per game. And it will be better for his development to earn a starting spot. Expectations are lowered as well.

Now that they have Boozer I actually kind of Like what LA is doing to ride out Kobe's procession into retirement.

If Nash can play half a season, and Kobe can play at a Jordan on the Wizards level, this could be a surprising team.

Nash / Lin
Bryant / Marshall
Young
Boozer/Randle / Davis
Hill/Sacre

Just add a wing or two from Aminu, Turner, Wes Johnson, Jordan Crawford and they are probably better than the Celtics.  :-\




Re: Lakers pick up Boozer off waivers
« Reply #19 on: July 17, 2014, 06:07:11 PM »

Offline Rondo9

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5379
  • Tommy Points: 277
Smart signing. Boozer immediately becomes far and away the best big man on the Lakers.

The Lalers desperately needed someone with some offensive skills. Jordan Hill, Ed Davis and Julius Randle wasn't going to work. Too many similar / combined limitations on the offensive end of the floor. They need someone with Boozer's jump-shooting and passing ability.

It'll stunt Julius Randle's growth since Boozer will takeup a lot of minutes.

If Randle can't earn those minutes by outplaying Boozer, he shouldn't get them.

I agree. Randle will, do just fine with 20 minutes per game. And it will be better for his development to earn a starting spot. Expectations are lowered as well.

Now that they have Boozer I actually kind of Like what LA is doing to ride out Kobe's procession into retirement.

If Nash can play half a season, and Kobe can play at a Jordan on the Wizards level, this could be a surprising team.

Nash / Lin
Bryant / Marshall
Young
Boozer/Randle / Davis
Hill/Sacre

Just add a wing or two from Aminu, Turner, Wes Johnson, Jordan Crawford and they are probably better than the Celtics.  :-\

Will they make the playoffs? Do they have a bright future? That roster is really not as good as the Celtics to me.

Re: Lakers pick up Boozer off waivers
« Reply #20 on: July 17, 2014, 06:19:41 PM »

Offline Mr October

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6129
  • Tommy Points: 247
Smart signing. Boozer immediately becomes far and away the best big man on the Lakers.

The Lalers desperately needed someone with some offensive skills. Jordan Hill, Ed Davis and Julius Randle wasn't going to work. Too many similar / combined limitations on the offensive end of the floor. They need someone with Boozer's jump-shooting and passing ability.

It'll stunt Julius Randle's growth since Boozer will takeup a lot of minutes.

If Randle can't earn those minutes by outplaying Boozer, he shouldn't get them.

I agree. Randle will, do just fine with 20 minutes per game. And it will be better for his development to earn a starting spot. Expectations are lowered as well.

Now that they have Boozer I actually kind of Like what LA is doing to ride out Kobe's procession into retirement.

If Nash can play half a season, and Kobe can play at a Jordan on the Wizards level, this could be a surprising team.

Nash / Lin
Bryant / Marshall
Young
Boozer/Randle / Davis
Hill/Sacre

Just add a wing or two from Aminu, Turner, Wes Johnson, Jordan Crawford and they are probably better than the Celtics.  :-\

Will they make the playoffs? Do they have a bright future? That roster is really not as good as the Celtics to me.

Oh heck no playoffs in the West. 35 wins is possible only if Bryant is healthy. And their future is terrible for the next 2 years. Then we will see if they can lure the big stars when they have room for a team up super team.

The Celtics have a bright future ahead. They have some rough stones that could become diamonds, as well as some nice role players. Plus the stack of draft picks. But i dont see them winning more than 32 games next year. The East got better in the middle.

Philly and Milwaukee still stink. Miami will drop to 45 wins. Brooklyn is all about the health of Lopez. And then all the other East teams are doing something to improve their teams.

Re: Lakers pick up Boozer off waivers
« Reply #21 on: July 17, 2014, 06:33:24 PM »

Offline saltlover

  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12490
  • Tommy Points: 2619

The Celtics have a bright future ahead. They have some rough stones that could become diamonds, as well as some nice role players. Plus the stack of draft picks. But i dont see them winning more than 32 games next year. The East got better in the middle.

Philly and Milwaukee still stink. Miami will drop to 45 wins. Brooklyn is all about the health of Lopez. And then all the other East teams are doing something to improve their teams.

Consider me unimpressed with the improvements of the Knicks and Detroit (whom you left out.)  Not saying I think the Celtics will make the playoffs, but I think a finish 8th to 10th in the conference is reasonable this year, pending future summer and in-season moves, of course.

Re: Lakers pick up Boozer off waivers
« Reply #22 on: July 17, 2014, 06:34:07 PM »

Offline Real World

  • Payton Pritchard
  • Posts: 105
  • Tommy Points: 8
Guys, you should all want the Lakers to be better than the Celtics right now, and as mediocre as humanly possible.  Nothing would be better as a Celtics fan, than to see the Lakers as the 9th seed in the West, drafting 14th overall next year.  Let's hope they enjoy the 20 years I had to endure, from the late 80's to early 00's.   

BTW, isn't the Lakers first round pick owed to Phoenix next year, from the Steve Nash deal?  Top 5 protected I think.  I could be wrong, but I think that's the case.

Re: Lakers pick up Boozer off waivers
« Reply #23 on: July 17, 2014, 06:48:22 PM »

Offline Future Celtics Owner

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3097
  • Tommy Points: 191
  • Celtic's only raise championship Banners
I'm glad. He will help them win some games and we will have a worse record and better chnce at lottery.

Re: Lakers pick up Boozer off waivers
« Reply #24 on: July 17, 2014, 06:48:28 PM »

Offline CelticSooner

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11884
  • Tommy Points: 902
  • GOT IT!!!
Guys, you should all want the Lakers to be better than the Celtics right now, and as mediocre as humanly possible.  Nothing would be better as a Celtics fan, than to see the Lakers as the 9th seed in the West, drafting 14th overall next year.  Let's hope they enjoy the 20 years I had to endure, from the late 80's to early 00's.   

BTW, isn't the Lakers first round pick owed to Phoenix next year, from the Steve Nash deal?  Top 5 protected I think.  I could be wrong, but I think that's the case.

That is correct. Apparently they want that pick badly as well.

Re: Lakers pick up Boozer off waivers
« Reply #25 on: July 17, 2014, 06:49:41 PM »

Offline SHAQATTACK

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 37794
  • Tommy Points: 3030
That helps our TANK ;)


Lakers are still gonna get their tails kicked in, by about  10 teams regularly  out west.

Kobe will get hurt again trying to play like he is still 21 yrs old

Re: Lakers pick up Boozer off waivers
« Reply #26 on: July 17, 2014, 07:03:44 PM »

Offline Mr October

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6129
  • Tommy Points: 247

The Celtics have a bright future ahead. They have some rough stones that could become diamonds, as well as some nice role players. Plus the stack of draft picks. But i dont see them winning more than 32 games next year. The East got better in the middle.

Philly and Milwaukee still stink. Miami will drop to 45 wins. Brooklyn is all about the health of Lopez. And then all the other East teams are doing something to improve their teams.

Consider me unimpressed with the improvements of the Knicks and Detroit (whom you left out.)  Not saying I think the Celtics will make the playoffs, but I think a finish 8th to 10th in the conference is reasonable this year, pending future summer and in-season moves, of course.

Detroit still has to resolve Greg Monroe. But i think Stan van gundy alone coaches them to 5 extra wins. They have added desperately needed shooters with Meeks, Butler and Augustin. They also quietly picked up a backup center in Aaron Grey.

The Knicks invigorated their motivation, desire to win, and ability to be taken seriously by bringing in Phil Jackson at the end of last season and then Resigning Anthony. I like the flip of Felton for Calderon. I like the drafting of Early. If Shumpert is healthy and Hardaway continues to improve, they will have a pretty balanced team, good enough to be better than the Celtics. I predict 35 wins and perhaps the 8th seed for the Knicks.

Re: Lakers pick up Boozer off waivers
« Reply #27 on: July 17, 2014, 07:16:03 PM »

Offline Cman

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13074
  • Tommy Points: 121
Miss on LeBron
Miss on Dwight
Miss on Nash
Miss on Carmelo
Land on Boozer


I am throughly enjoying the universe's two finger salute to the purple and gold.

Whiff on Gasol...
Celtics fan for life.

Re: Lakers pick up Boozer off waivers
« Reply #28 on: July 17, 2014, 07:20:12 PM »

Offline TheTruthFot18

  • NCE
  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2125
  • Tommy Points: 263
  • Truth Juice
I've heard multiple Laker fans cry this offseason. This is epic.  ;D
The Nets will finish with the worst record and the Celtics will end up with the 4th pick.

- Me (sometime in January)

--------------------------------------------------------

Guess I was wrong (May 23rd)

Re: Lakers pick up Boozer off waivers
« Reply #29 on: July 17, 2014, 08:24:48 PM »

Offline Beat LA

  • NCE
  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8338
  • Tommy Points: 896
  • Mr. Emoji
Guys, you should all want the Lakers to be better than the Celtics right now, and as mediocre as humanly possible.  Nothing would be better as a Celtics fan, than to see the Lakers as the 9th seed in the West, drafting 14th overall next year.  Let's hope they enjoy the 20 years I had to endure, from the late 80's to early 00's.   

BTW, isn't the Lakers first round pick owed to Phoenix next year, from the Steve Nash deal?  Top 5 protected I think.  I could be wrong, but I think that's the case.

Well said.  TP.