0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Jailan34 on July 02, 2014, 09:58:13 AMQuote from: Snakehead on July 02, 2014, 09:52:55 AMQuote from: AB_Celtic on July 02, 2014, 09:49:37 AMNope. Nope nope nope. Too much. Smart will be able to do nearly everything Bradley does, and then some other stuff, for $3mil a year.Don't like this.And what should we do once he needs another contract? Let him walk too? Constantly stock a team of top 10 picks and be really cheap and let every veteran walk?Some of you guys are very unrealistic about building teams and salaries.I don't think a lot of us are being unrealistic. It would be less of a big deal if this were the only overpayed player on our roster but its the fourth. We have Bass at 6, Wallace at 10, Green at roughly 9 and now Bradley at 8. We have a bunch of overpayed role players before we acquired our star talent. Danny is building the team backwards IMO. Stars first, then fill in the role players around the, not the other way around.Green and Bass are not even overpaid so we are not going to find an even ground on this I suppose. Look around the league at what other players get paid. I feel like you guys just don't do that? I don't know how else to explain it.Wallace is overpaid obviously and that's why he is one of the worst contracts in the league, which we inherited, and why he was in the trade with the Nets.
Quote from: Snakehead on July 02, 2014, 09:52:55 AMQuote from: AB_Celtic on July 02, 2014, 09:49:37 AMNope. Nope nope nope. Too much. Smart will be able to do nearly everything Bradley does, and then some other stuff, for $3mil a year.Don't like this.And what should we do once he needs another contract? Let him walk too? Constantly stock a team of top 10 picks and be really cheap and let every veteran walk?Some of you guys are very unrealistic about building teams and salaries.I don't think a lot of us are being unrealistic. It would be less of a big deal if this were the only overpayed player on our roster but its the fourth. We have Bass at 6, Wallace at 10, Green at roughly 9 and now Bradley at 8. We have a bunch of overpayed role players before we acquired our star talent. Danny is building the team backwards IMO. Stars first, then fill in the role players around the, not the other way around.
Quote from: AB_Celtic on July 02, 2014, 09:49:37 AMNope. Nope nope nope. Too much. Smart will be able to do nearly everything Bradley does, and then some other stuff, for $3mil a year.Don't like this.And what should we do once he needs another contract? Let him walk too? Constantly stock a team of top 10 picks and be really cheap and let every veteran walk?Some of you guys are very unrealistic about building teams and salaries.
Nope. Nope nope nope. Too much. Smart will be able to do nearly everything Bradley does, and then some other stuff, for $3mil a year.Don't like this.
Despite his drawbacks, Avery is underrated as a shooter and an off-ball offensive threat in general. Considering he's only 23 and may still improve, a 32M / 8yrs is deal not exactly hard to justify.
Quote from: chenaren on July 02, 2014, 09:57:18 AMDespite his drawbacks, Avery is underrated as a shooter and an off-ball offensive threat in general. Considering he's only 23 and may still improve, a 32M / 8yrs is deal not exactly hard to justify.Underrated as a shooter? The only 2 shots he has in his arsenal is the corner 3 , and a pull up 15 ft J off the dribble . He is a horrible passer/playmaker , horrible at finish at the rim , and his defensive intensity isn't there like his first few years . Add to that all the injuries , and the amount of cap space this is taking up, this is just BAD IMO
Then I guess we just have different opinions on what Green and bass are worth. I feel like Green is worth about 7 and Bass 5 or under. They're bench players.
Ugh...First there were "fireworks"Then there were "sparks"Now we just lit a match that went out on its own.
Quote from: D.o.s. on July 02, 2014, 09:56:19 AMLC's gotta be popping champagne.8 million a year is more than I would have paid him, but with the cap rising and the fact that we're probably not going to bring in any blockbuster free agents, its ok. The Meeks deal basically ensured this one, at least to my eye.I'm betting the Lance Stephenson market is dictating it too and we will see that. Dude is going to get paid.
LC's gotta be popping champagne.8 million a year is more than I would have paid him, but with the cap rising and the fact that we're probably not going to bring in any blockbuster free agents, its ok. The Meeks deal basically ensured this one, at least to my eye.
Quote from: Jailan34 on July 02, 2014, 10:01:17 AMThen I guess we just have different opinions on what Green and bass are worth. I feel like Green is worth about 7 and Bass 5 or under. They're bench players.What do you think about Luol Dengs contract?