I think you misunderstand my point.
Is it impossible for Boston to become a contender ? Of course not. Is it possible Ainge has some further moves up his sleeve? Absolutely. Is it possible Marcus smart reaches his Eric Bledsoe ceiling ? No doubt. Could embiid and Noel both bust ? Maybe.
But right now if you were to project Philly's future vs Boston's, it's a no contest. We have a veteran former all-star PG possibly on the way out. We have a solid asset in Marcus smart. Beyond that we have role player talent and some picks that nobody can confidently project.
Philly, on the other hand, has a player the most project will be an elite defensive big (Noel), a player most project has transcendent superstar potential (embiid), a young PG who is coming off a rookie of the year season, and a foreign prospect that people rave about (Saric)... Plus a trajectory that makes them seem like a lock to bottom out again next year ... Plus several other picks that nobody can confidently project.
Anything can happen. But right now I think most reasonable NBA fans would rather have Philly's assets than Boston's assets. Pose the question on a neutral forum and see for yourself.
It probably comes down to how closely they follow the league. I'd guess you're unaware of the difference in assets going forward. Boston has 7-8 first rounders in the next 4 drafts and can swap picks with the Nets in another year. Philly has 2-3 first rounders in the next 4 years. The have a rookie pg that they were reportedly shopping because they were worried he was a "put up big numbers on a bad team" type of player, They have a rookie big who's not much of an offensive player who's coming back from knee injury and another rookie big (the only player on their roster that could realistically be called a franchise player) who's already suffered two troubling injuries (back and feet) and hasn't played a game in the pros yet. It's easy to get caught up in the hype of other teams (as you're wont to do) but the odds of them having a better future than us probably begin and end with Embiid having an injury free superstar career or adding a similar player that's not on their roster now.
I guess that in your haste to argue and distort 33's point, you missed the two words in bold, Timmy.
And he happens to be right. Sure doesn't appear to be anyone else in the league enamored with "assets," but there sure doesn't appear to be any other GM in the league as enamored with Rondo as you are, either.
With one caveat to 33: I disagree with him on one point. After speaking with a former Oklahoma State player, I'd rather not have Marcus Smart than have him. God bless Brad Stevens. He is going to earn his money trying to straighten this kid out.
With this additional point: Given Ainge's draft record, characterizing those picks as assets is, at best, optimistic. Marking down the possession of draft choices as certain positive elements of the future for a GM who has picked Fab Melo, JR Giddens, JJ Johnson, et al. - and who couldn't find any takers for a lottery pick this year - is, to be as kind as I can, a humorous leap of faith.
Doesn't appear at this point that Flip Saunders is too impressed with them either, does it? Didn't see anyone lining up to trade for them this month, either.
Ah, CelticsBlog: Where "assets" are overvalued. Reality is going to be a tough thing around here. Soon.
Right now - there are those words again you ignored - it appears clear that it's going to get worse - MUCH WORSE - before it gets better. How ironic that a retrospective on Pitino's first draft aired last week. Ironic, indeed.