Author Topic: Sacramento offered #8 for rondo? (speculation)  (Read 12522 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Sacramento offered #8 for rondo? (speculation)
« on: June 26, 2014, 01:16:07 PM »

Offline bleedGREENdon

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 621
  • Tommy Points: 29
So I'm assuming they offered McClemore and #8 for rondo, if the love deal doesn't go down, I say we ditch McClemore, ask them for an expiring and throw Gerald Wallace in there. Sac has been wanting rondo all year they have to pay Rudy gay 20mill this year, I mean they seem pretty desperate for Rondo. Put Wallace on them draft Marcus Smart, Draft Embiid, Draft Zach Lavine at 17. With everyone healthy I think we could make the 8 seed this year with a lineup of

Smart
Avery
Green
Sully
Embiid

Work on Lavine to become our future SG, guys athleticism is ridiculous. We could have a potential 3 all stars with this draft.

Again this is we can't trade for love.

Now another thing I was thinking is if we can trade down to #1 somehow I would keep the pick.
« Last Edit: June 26, 2014, 01:58:42 PM by Fafnir »

Re: Sacramento offered #8 for rondo
« Reply #1 on: June 26, 2014, 01:19:29 PM »

Offline fairweatherfan

  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20738
  • Tommy Points: 2365
  • Be the posts you wish to see in the world.
So I'm assuming they offered McClemore and #8 for rondo,

So this is something you think happened, or something that sources are saying actually happened?  If it's the first one you might want to change the title.

Re: Sacramento offered #8 for rondo
« Reply #2 on: June 26, 2014, 01:20:15 PM »

Offline knuckleballer

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6368
  • Tommy Points: 664
If we're rebuilding who cares if we have Wallace's contract since we won't be players in next year's free agent market anyway.  I'd rather give McLemore a shot.

Re: Sacramento offered #8 for rondo
« Reply #3 on: June 26, 2014, 01:26:45 PM »

Offline heyvik

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2162
  • Tommy Points: 77
So I'm assuming they offered McClemore and #8 for rondo,

So this is something you think happened, or something that sources are saying actually happened?  If it's the first one you might want to change the title.
Yeah you might want to change the title - Kinda misleading.

Re: Sacramento offered #8 for rondo
« Reply #4 on: June 26, 2014, 01:29:22 PM »

Offline Eja117

  • NCE
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19274
  • Tommy Points: 1254
So I'm assuming they offered McClemore and #8 for rondo,

So this is something you think happened, or something that sources are saying actually happened?  If it's the first one you might want to change the title.
Yeah you might want to change the title - Kinda misleading.
seconded

Re: Sacramento offered #8 for rondo
« Reply #5 on: June 26, 2014, 01:30:47 PM »

Offline The One

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2017
  • Tommy Points: 203
So I'm assuming they offered McClemore and #8 for rondo,

So this is something you think happened, or something that sources are saying actually happened?  If it's the first one you might want to change the title.
Yeah you might want to change the title - Kinda misleading.
seconded
Thirded

Re: Sacramento offered #8 for rondo
« Reply #6 on: June 26, 2014, 01:31:23 PM »

Offline jambr380

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13752
  • Tommy Points: 2061
  • Sometimes there's no sane reason for optimism
Yeah, I don't understand - is this something you saw via a source or something dating back to the trade deadline? If it is a new source, I would surely be interested in the story.

Re: Sacramento offered #8 for rondo
« Reply #7 on: June 26, 2014, 01:31:36 PM »

Offline NorthernLightning

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 759
  • Tommy Points: 69
  • zap
Fourthed. Edited.  Profanity and masked profanity are against forum rules and may result in discipline.?

Re: Sacramento offered #8 for rondo
« Reply #8 on: June 26, 2014, 01:36:18 PM »

Offline footey

  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16039
  • Tommy Points: 1837
If we're rebuilding who cares if we have Wallace's contract since we won't be players in next year's free agent market anyway.  I'd rather give McLemore a shot.

me too. I doubt he is on table with 8.

Re: Sacramento offered #8 for rondo
« Reply #9 on: June 26, 2014, 01:38:14 PM »

Offline manl_lui

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6571
  • Tommy Points: 427
I really hope this draft is done with...the past week or two has been brutal to me with all these rumors...

I understand the whole trade Rondo argument but I'm so attached to our players that gave their all, Rondo, PP, KG

 :'(  :'(  :'(  :'(  :'(  :'(  :'(

Re: Sacramento offered #8 for rondo
« Reply #10 on: June 26, 2014, 01:41:40 PM »

Offline bleedGREENdon

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 621
  • Tommy Points: 29
Source is comcast sports net and yes McClemore was included , it was McClemore and 8 for Rondo.

Re: Sacramento offered #8 for rondo
« Reply #11 on: June 26, 2014, 01:45:51 PM »

Offline D.o.s.

  • NCE
  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14061
  • Tommy Points: 1239
So I'm assuming they offered McClemore and #8 for rondo,

So this is something you think happened, or something that sources are saying actually happened?  If it's the first one you might want to change the title.
.
At least a goldfish with a Lincoln Log on its back goin' across your floor to your sock drawer has a miraculous connotation to it.

Re: Sacramento offered #8 for rondo
« Reply #12 on: June 26, 2014, 01:50:09 PM »

Offline NorthernLightning

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 759
  • Tommy Points: 69
  • zap
OP should have included a link, like this: Are Kings preparing an offer to Celtics for Rondo? http://www.csnne.com/boston-celtics/are-kings-preparing-offer-celtics-rondo

Re: Sacramento offered #8 for rondo? (speculation)
« Reply #13 on: June 26, 2014, 02:01:01 PM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
If Embiid falls (not happening) and Sac offers #8 + Mclemore for a Rondo rental (probably not happening), you gotta do it.

Re: Sacramento offered #8 for rondo? (speculation)
« Reply #14 on: June 26, 2014, 02:08:32 PM »

Offline Future Celtics Owner

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3097
  • Tommy Points: 191
  • Celtic's only raise championship Banners
If Embiid falls (not happening) and Sac offers #8 + Mclemore for a Rondo rental (probably not happening), you gotta do it.
Like you and I talked about in another post, mclemore turned it on last part of the season(5-8games) and now Sac is high on him again. The number 8 is important but maybe we can ask for another future pick to go along with it if they are placing too much value on Mclemore.....