0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: bknova on June 26, 2014, 02:32:51 PMQuote from: Celtics39 on June 26, 2014, 02:23:35 PMIt's amazing to me that so many are willing to risk such a high pick on a guy who has a GREAT chance of never being healthy. I'd really be frustrated if we take Embiid and he's Greg Oden 2.0. This entire year would have been for naught.Wait, what are we risking. At 6, presumably Wiggins, Parker, Exum, Smart, and one of Gordon/Vonleh/Randle are off the board. At 6, we are risking not drafting whichever two players of Gordon/Vonleh/Randle/Smart are still on the board. At 3, your risking not picking 4 of those guys. Gordon is going to have a long, solid, but not spectacular NBA career, as is Smart. Randle could make some all star teams. Vonleh might too. I don't see any one of those 4 as a centerpiece on championship team. All could be solid rotation players, a couple starters but none the go to guy. Whereas Exum, Wiggins, and Parker can all be that guy. To me the risk is minimal at 6.Food for thought: This model gives Marcus Smart a 32% chance of becoming a star (2nd only to Embiid and this model doesn't reflect his health woes). It gives Gordon a 27% chance, which is equal to Wiggins.https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Aipd_3kGfREgdHRtcThFd3ZtMlRPYldIRmdGb241RlE&usp=drive_web#gid=9
Quote from: Celtics39 on June 26, 2014, 02:23:35 PMIt's amazing to me that so many are willing to risk such a high pick on a guy who has a GREAT chance of never being healthy. I'd really be frustrated if we take Embiid and he's Greg Oden 2.0. This entire year would have been for naught.Wait, what are we risking. At 6, presumably Wiggins, Parker, Exum, Smart, and one of Gordon/Vonleh/Randle are off the board. At 6, we are risking not drafting whichever two players of Gordon/Vonleh/Randle/Smart are still on the board. At 3, your risking not picking 4 of those guys. Gordon is going to have a long, solid, but not spectacular NBA career, as is Smart. Randle could make some all star teams. Vonleh might too. I don't see any one of those 4 as a centerpiece on championship team. All could be solid rotation players, a couple starters but none the go to guy. Whereas Exum, Wiggins, and Parker can all be that guy. To me the risk is minimal at 6.
It's amazing to me that so many are willing to risk such a high pick on a guy who has a GREAT chance of never being healthy. I'd really be frustrated if we take Embiid and he's Greg Oden 2.0. This entire year would have been for naught.
I am a huge Smart guy, I am fine with drafting him and shipping Rondo and start the rebuild with him...
Quote from: CM0 on June 26, 2014, 03:15:51 PMQuote from: bknova on June 26, 2014, 02:32:51 PMQuote from: Celtics39 on June 26, 2014, 02:23:35 PMIt's amazing to me that so many are willing to risk such a high pick on a guy who has a GREAT chance of never being healthy. I'd really be frustrated if we take Embiid and he's Greg Oden 2.0. This entire year would have been for naught.Wait, what are we risking. At 6, presumably Wiggins, Parker, Exum, Smart, and one of Gordon/Vonleh/Randle are off the board. At 6, we are risking not drafting whichever two players of Gordon/Vonleh/Randle/Smart are still on the board. At 3, your risking not picking 4 of those guys. Gordon is going to have a long, solid, but not spectacular NBA career, as is Smart. Randle could make some all star teams. Vonleh might too. I don't see any one of those 4 as a centerpiece on championship team. All could be solid rotation players, a couple starters but none the go to guy. Whereas Exum, Wiggins, and Parker can all be that guy. To me the risk is minimal at 6.Food for thought: This model gives Marcus Smart a 32% chance of becoming a star (2nd only to Embiid and this model doesn't reflect his health woes). It gives Gordon a 27% chance, which is equal to Wiggins.https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Aipd_3kGfREgdHRtcThFd3ZtMlRPYldIRmdGb241RlE&usp=drive_web#gid=9I got no stats to back anything up. All just gut. I think the difference between the top 7, 8 players in this draft isn't so dynamically great that any one of them could fairly easily turn out to be the best player of the class.
Quote from: bknova on June 26, 2014, 03:20:13 PMQuote from: CM0 on June 26, 2014, 03:15:51 PMQuote from: bknova on June 26, 2014, 02:32:51 PMQuote from: Celtics39 on June 26, 2014, 02:23:35 PMIt's amazing to me that so many are willing to risk such a high pick on a guy who has a GREAT chance of never being healthy. I'd really be frustrated if we take Embiid and he's Greg Oden 2.0. This entire year would have been for naught.Wait, what are we risking. At 6, presumably Wiggins, Parker, Exum, Smart, and one of Gordon/Vonleh/Randle are off the board. At 6, we are risking not drafting whichever two players of Gordon/Vonleh/Randle/Smart are still on the board. At 3, your risking not picking 4 of those guys. Gordon is going to have a long, solid, but not spectacular NBA career, as is Smart. Randle could make some all star teams. Vonleh might too. I don't see any one of those 4 as a centerpiece on championship team. All could be solid rotation players, a couple starters but none the go to guy. Whereas Exum, Wiggins, and Parker can all be that guy. To me the risk is minimal at 6.Food for thought: This model gives Marcus Smart a 32% chance of becoming a star (2nd only to Embiid and this model doesn't reflect his health woes). It gives Gordon a 27% chance, which is equal to Wiggins.https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Aipd_3kGfREgdHRtcThFd3ZtMlRPYldIRmdGb241RlE&usp=drive_web#gid=9I got no stats to back anything up. All just gut. I think the difference between the top 7, 8 players in this draft isn't so dynamically great that any one of them could fairly easily turn out to be the best player of the class.Love the fact that he took on everyone during his pre-draft workouts...
According a source, the #Sixers asked Julius Randle and Noah Vonleh to work out for this morning. It's unknown if they accepted.Keith pompeyHe could slide to us if sixers pass on him
At this point, any draft movement by the #Celtics will likely be down, not up. #CelicsTalk- @SherrodbCSNHearing same RT @SherrodbCSN: At this point, any draft movement by the #Celtics will likely be down, not up. #CelicsTalk- @sam_amick
Quote from: crownontherocks on June 26, 2014, 05:53:48 PMAccording a source, the #Sixers asked Julius Randle and Noah Vonleh to work out for this morning. It's unknown if they accepted.Keith pompeyHe could slide to us if sixers pass on himI'll be psyched if the Sixers take Randle. That means the Celtics don't take him and everyone slides down a slot.
Both Amick and Sherrod are saying that we may trade down if we are looking to trade. Wonder what the play there would be.
Quote from: mnshyn on June 26, 2014, 05:57:45 PMBoth Amick and Sherrod are saying that we may trade down if we are looking to trade. Wonder what the play there would be.Taking Gordon #6 is probably too high. Prob trade down to get him at #10 or something + pick up a 2nd.
QuoteAt this point, any draft movement by the #Celtics will likely be down, not up. #CelicsTalk- @SherrodbCSNHearing same RT @SherrodbCSN: At this point, any draft movement by the #Celtics will likely be down, not up. #CelicsTalk- @sam_amickBoth Amick and Sherrod are saying that we may trade down if we are looking to trade. Wonder what the play there would be.