I do not understand the interest in VDN. Unless a front office is looking for a captain for the Titanic, I'm not sure why he's on anyone's list.
I'm not understanding how Del Negro is such a horrible coach. The Clippers...With a much better supporting cast...Didn't look markedly better this year than last. I saw a few Clips games last year and didn't see Del Negro getting outcoached.
LAC paid a gazillion dollars to Rivers to get a better team barely one round further. Apparently Rivers shouldn't be on anyone's list either.
I know you're no fan of Doc Rivers, but this is an absurd post.
In what way? I find the commentary on Del Negro more absurd. If Del Negro had the roster Rivers had he'd have gotten just as far as Rivers did....Maybe further....Because he would've been focused on his team instead of the media after the Sterling fiasco.
Del Negro is a nice dude -- he's very similar to Mike Brown, in that way. He's great at handling locker room personalities in low-key situations, like the Clippers before Chris Paul, and generally keeping things upbeat on do-nothing teams.
There are, however, very real reasons why he's only been able to coach a team to a winning record once. And there's also an easy explanation why the Bulls jumped from 41 wins under VDN to 62 wins under Thibs, and it wasn't all Derrick Rose finding himself.