Author Topic: Gordon or Randle?  (Read 7404 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Gordon or Randle?
« Reply #15 on: May 21, 2014, 09:13:53 AM »

Offline SHAQATTACK

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 37775
  • Tommy Points: 3030
I wish we had a hole at the PF spot because I could get excited about Randle, Vonleh, or Gordon.

Have to say Randle though in a vacuum.
Vonleh may work out as a 5, he measured pretty big at the combine, and may not be done growing.

Hole or no hole, though, you gotta go BPA here.

Vonleh is big enough to play C in the NBA even if he doesn't keep growing.  But considering his age and the length of his arms , it wouldn't be at all surprising if he grew another inch or two.

Yeah ..this seems more possible as help for the Celtics center less on going plight

Although ...Gordon might be better paired with Marc Gasol........don't know if Marci's obtainable in any way though......sure would have been nice having that top three to dangle under teams noses.

It s hard to build around and choose players when we don't have a center ......

Re: Gordon or Randle?
« Reply #16 on: May 21, 2014, 09:24:12 AM »

Offline Nef-Oracle

  • Derrick White
  • Posts: 283
  • Tommy Points: 5
Aaron Gordon

Re: Gordon or Randle?
« Reply #17 on: May 21, 2014, 09:31:07 AM »

Online Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 52703
  • Tommy Points: 2566
Aaron Gordon

Do not trust Randle's game at all. Lack of offensive range + lack of defensive awareness + struggles to finish over size in the paint. Lot of issues for him to overcome to be a high quality NBA starter down the road.

I'd rather take Aaron Gordon. Worst case scenario, if Gordon doesn't develop his offensive game, Gordon still ends up being a very valuable role player with elite defense + rebounding for the next 15 years. That is still very useful even if Gordon doesn't become a star.
« Last Edit: May 21, 2014, 09:47:49 AM by Who »

Re: Gordon or Randle?
« Reply #18 on: May 21, 2014, 09:41:28 AM »

Offline Tr1boy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27260
  • Tommy Points: 867
With the fab melo incident dont think danny takes vonleh. Stevens wont have the patients either. Vonleh is not as bad but has pretty mediocre iq and feel for the game

Re: Gordon or Randle?
« Reply #19 on: May 21, 2014, 09:54:49 AM »

Offline moiso

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7677
  • Tommy Points: 447
I hope Gordon or Randle go 4 or 5 so we can grab Vonleh.

Re: Gordon or Randle?
« Reply #20 on: May 21, 2014, 09:57:53 AM »

Offline colincb

  • NCE
  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5095
  • Tommy Points: 501
Vonleh, Smart, Randle, Gordon in that order with Gordon a distant 4th.

Re: Gordon or Randle?
« Reply #21 on: May 21, 2014, 10:00:12 AM »

Offline RLewis35

  • Al Horford
  • Posts: 446
  • Tommy Points: 20
  • I drink and I know things
Smart or Vonleh.

Re: Gordon or Randle?
« Reply #22 on: May 21, 2014, 10:06:22 AM »

Offline knuckleballer

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6368
  • Tommy Points: 664
I hope Gordon or Randle go 4 or 5 so we can grab Vonleh.

Vonleh has a huge wingspan, massive hands, and is still only 18.  I wonder if that is any indication that he is still growing.

When watching him at Indiana, he played well but looked a little slow and unathletic to me, but then he tested off the charts at the combine.  I'm not sure what to make of him.  It seems like he could have a lot of upside.

Re: Gordon or Randle?
« Reply #23 on: May 21, 2014, 10:12:02 AM »

Offline saltlover

  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12490
  • Tommy Points: 2619
If Gordon is available at #6, I wonder if Phoenix would be willing to trade up to get him.  They have a ton of picks both this year and next, and he is rumored to be pretty high on their draft board.  It's a very deep draft.  If Phoenix were to offer #14, 18, and #27, the C's would be in the range to pick the best college wing available at #14 (I'd bet at least one of Stauskas or Young will be available there), a couple of international draft-and-stashes at #17 and #18 (certainly some combination of Nurkic, Capela, and Porzingis), and a college big at #27 (Mitch McGary would be my choice.)

Assuming they all stay in, the international draft class is very deep, and grabbing some extra picks to bring over some guys in a year or two when they're more ready would be very intriguing to me.

Re: Gordon or Randle?
« Reply #24 on: May 21, 2014, 10:27:01 AM »

Offline crimson_stallion

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5964
  • Tommy Points: 875
gordon is a tweener, everyone keeps on talking aboout his great athleticism but his wingspan is actually shorter than randle, and randle must have 30 pounds on him. i have vonleh ahead of both and randle ahead of gordon, i'll hate to get gordon,.

I agree...I'd have to take Randle, as I think he has higher upside and higher trade value.  Trade value is important because if I got either of those guys they would become instant trade bait. 

I think both of these guys are very high risks to turn out major busts. 

I think Randle will struggle to dominate against NBA size the way he did against smaller adn weaker college players, and I think that lack of physical dominance will expose his relative lack of skills in the post. I think this will in turn expose his lack of skills from the perimeter, because when he struggles to score in the post he isn't going to have a backup act.

I think Gordon will become a tweener in the purest form.  I think he will get absolutely tortured defensively at the PF spot thanks to his lack of height and slight frame.  I think his offense at the PF spot will be limited to the occasional hustle point and put back, because he lacks the post moves or inside touch to score against NBA size.  I think he'll struggle a the SF spot because of his relative lack of scoring touch, and his (IMO) overated ball handling ability.  I think he'll become a pure slasher who gets a few points here and there from the free throw line and (again) from putbacks.  Ultimately I think he will fade into mediocrity and will end up being a defensive role player in the mould of Gerald Wallace - he might peak out as a above average starter, then eventually fade to a defensive specialist off the bench.  Like Wallace his most noteworthy career achievements will probably be putting on some fancy shows in the All-Star dunk contest...ohterwise he'll just be yet another super athletic NBA talent who never really amounted to much.

Vonleh I think will be different.  He is just too young and too skilled to not amount to something, regardless of his IQ.  How many 18 year old's have come in to the NBA with those type of physical attributes combined with a post game, a silky smooth jump shot (out to the three point line), elite rebounding and major defensive capabilities...only to end up a nobody?  I can't think of any.  It's very rare to find a big man with a skill set that versatile, and I think he is all but certain to become a future All-Star (or at least a borderline All-Star).

I think Smart is different too.  There are just too many good sized combo guards coming in to the league these days that turn out to be very nice players - Dwyane Wade, Bradley Beal, Damian Lillard, Derek Rose, Russel Westbrook, Victor Oladipo, etc.  It seems like 6'4" scoring combo guards are the flavour of the month in the NBA, and guys like this just seem to slide really easilly in to the NBA game.  The biggest knock on Smart is his lack of a jumper. but many of the above guys (such as Wade, Wall, Rose) all had that same problem when they came in to the league...and still do really.  Despite this, those guys were able to become high level scorers at the NBA level.  I think Smart will follow in that mould and I think his floor will be a 16/4/5 type, with his leader's mentality and defensive abilities being the 'icing on the cake' so to speak. 

For that reason I think Vonleh and Smart will be the next best players after the top 4.

With the fab melo incident dont think danny takes vonleh. Stevens wont have the patients either. Vonleh is not as bad but has pretty mediocre iq and feel for the game

Ok, there is a BIG difference between Vonleh and Fab.

Fab Melo was questioned for  his work ethic, he was questioned for his skill level, and he had only played basketball for two years.  His IQ wasn't just average or below average, it was Javale McGee bad.  Vonleh's IQ is a weakness, but it's not that bad.

Also Fab melo never had Vonleh's skill set.  Fab had practically no post game, an unspectacular jumper, couldn't make an open layup 5 feet from the basket, and rebounded like a small forward.  If Fab had Vonleh's post game, his willingness to bang inside, his shooting ability, finishing ability and his rebounding ability...his career would have gone VERY differently.

Plus there is no shortage of big men who went far despite mediocre IQ. Dwight Howard is a perfect example.  Dwight might be a freak athlete, but he doesn't have anything even remotely close to Vonleh's offensive versatility.  Yet as much as dwight may be a physical specimen now, when he entered the league his measurements (height, weight, length, etc) were very similar to Vonleh's.  Vonleh is a 6'10", 240 lbs guy with a 7'4" wingspan, a 36.5" max vertical and 7% body fat.  Physically average he is not.

Re: Gordon or Randle?
« Reply #25 on: May 21, 2014, 10:55:05 AM »

Offline Kane3387

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8269
  • Tommy Points: 944
  • Intensity!!!
At certain points coming into the year and at the beginning Randle was touted as the number one pick. When Kentucky started to play poorly so did he and it had a lot to do with their team being young and very selfish pg play. That all changed in the tourney and they made a run with him as the lead dog.

Randle in high school was right on par with wiggins and Parker. I think he has the most talent and best chance to be a star player. At his size to have his handle and his motor at his age is pretty amazing.

I'd take randle.


KG: "Dude.... What is up with yo shorts?!"

CBD_2016 Cavs Remaining Picks - 14.14

Re: Gordon or Randle?
« Reply #26 on: May 21, 2014, 11:02:31 AM »

Offline Celtics18

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11688
  • Tommy Points: 1469
Given a choice between Randle and Gordon, I take Gordon.  I think he has more star potential in the NBA.
DKC Seventy-Sixers:

PG: G. Hill/D. Schroder
SG: C. Lee/B. Hield/T. Luwawu
SF:  Giannis/J. Lamb/M. Kuzminskas
PF:  E. Ilyasova/J. Jerebko/R. Christmas
C:    N. Vucevic/K. Olynyk/E. Davis/C. Jefferson

Re: Gordon or Randle?
« Reply #27 on: May 21, 2014, 11:08:24 AM »

Offline Evantime34

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11942
  • Tommy Points: 764
  • Eagerly Awaiting the Next Fantasy Draft
Gordon higher upside and i'm a sucker for elite defenders. I think he could end up playing some wing and could end up being more of an Iguodala type than a Blake Griffin type.

I think you draft Gordon then trade for Asik with the 17th. We will suddenly have the makings of an extremely strong defensive unit. Then when we have free agency the following year we make our picks then grab and top level scorer in free agency to play around a stout defense.
DKC:  Rockets
CB Draft: Memphis Grizz
Players: Klay Thompson, Jabari Parker, Aaron Gordon
Next 3 picks: 4.14, 4.15, 4.19

Re: Gordon or Randle?
« Reply #28 on: May 21, 2014, 11:12:45 AM »

Offline Tr1boy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27260
  • Tommy Points: 867
At certain points coming into the year and at the beginning Randle was touted as the number one pick. When Kentucky started to play poorly so did he and it had a lot to do with their team being young and very selfish pg play. That all changed in the tourney and they made a run with him as the lead dog.

Randle in high school was right on par with wiggins and Parker. I think he has the most talent and best chance to be a star player. At his size to have his handle and his motor at his age is pretty amazing.

I'd take randle.

I agree with you on your point. Just his lack of jumper and getting stuffed enough times is worrisome.

Re: Gordon or Randle?
« Reply #29 on: May 21, 2014, 11:16:42 AM »

Offline knuckleballer

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6368
  • Tommy Points: 664
At certain points coming into the year and at the beginning Randle was touted as the number one pick. When Kentucky started to play poorly so did he and it had a lot to do with their team being young and very selfish pg play. That all changed in the tourney and they made a run with him as the lead dog.

Randle in high school was right on par with wiggins and Parker. I think he has the most talent and best chance to be a star player. At his size to have his handle and his motor at his age is pretty amazing.

I'd take randle.

I agree with you on your point. Just his lack of jumper and getting stuffed enough times is worrisome.

If he's getting stuffed a lot in college, it's only going to get worse in the NBA