I mean a lot of it is based on a shaky premise. THe idea that this draft is "epic" and that the top 4 guys have a chance to be the Wade/Bosh/Bron/Melo of 2014.
Let's pretend for a second that the premise isn't completely ridiculous and that Embiid, Wiggins, Parker and Exum are all allstars in the making. Let's say there is a massive drop-off after #4.
There are 3 games left in this season. This win dropped us from #3 to #5. By the end of the week we could slip to #7... some bad lotto luck will drop us to #9. IF you like winning, why wouldn't you root for us to lose? You wouldn't sacrifice a handful of meaningless games for a shot at securing a franchise player? I don't understand that at all.
I feel like the anti-tankers don't get the mindset. We want to lose, because we like winning more than you do. I don't want 3 wins and then another 26 win season. I want 3 losses and a decade of 50+ wins.
And yeah, I get the whole "there is no certainty blah blah blah" dance that the anti-tankers throw out. Whatever. If we pretend for a second that the experts are right and Embiid, Wiggins, Parker and Exum are beasts... then we should all be 1000% on board with trying to land one of those guys. If the experts end up being correct and we end up picking 6th thanks to a couple meaningless wins at the tail end of a dreadful 2014 season, I'm pretty certain nobody is going to be happy about it.