I think Ainge is a very good GM, but his draft history has been below average for some time... certainly since the Rondo pick.
Other than Sully (who was a slam dunk when taken), the choices have been misses for the most part. Bradley was a solid choice, though not a reach at all.
Olynyk's limitations were very clear. It's what frustates me about not takign a shot at GA, as many of us hoped. When you know you're getting a 10th man, why trade up for him when you could take a prospect?
People are focusing on how Ainge ""whiffed"" on Giannis.
It's too early to judge Olynyk. It's also too early to judge Giannis.
Again, perspective. People wanted Shabazz Muhammed. People wanted Dennis Shroeder. Some people were calling MCW a probable bust.
Sure. If you presume Olynyk won't improve one single bit he'd be a tenth man. So, at the very least you have an NBA player who can play minutes.
Looking at the list of 2013 draftees, I could imagine Olynyk potentially playing more minutes and contributing more than any of the draftees in his range and, hell, some picks in the top 10.
Ainge's biggest misses were also misses by other GMs. DeAndre Jordan (and General Zod on the Timberwolves?) wasn't drafted until several spots after Ainge drafted. Chandler Parsons was mid second.
And you were talking about AB? Some people wanted James Andersen, drafted immediately after AB.
Dominique Jones and Damion James were drafted after AB, too...who the hell are they!?