odd thought on ray allen, will his number be retired anywhere? seattle?
He's got to be in Seattle. No question about it. It might even happen in Milwaukee, seeing as how he started his career there and was arguably the best of the Bucks' "Big Three" (along with Cassell and Robinson).
As for the KG/Allen question, let's eliminate for a moment the Celtics who were elected to the Hall of Fame for their playing accomplishments (and Brown and Auerbach, of course, since they didn't play). The following are the players whose numbers have been retired by Boston who are NOT in the HoF for playing:
-Dennis Johnson
-JoJo White
-Satch Sanders
-Don Nelson
-Cedric Maxwell
-Reggie Lewis
-Jim Loscutoff
I'm inclined to give Lewis a pass for the reasons other people have mentioned; I think our championship window is extended if he doesn't die. Locsy isn't really considered because his isn't a retired number; Cowens did it for him. DJ, while not in the Hall of Fame, is probably going to get in sometime in the near future; 3 championships and great post-season play is going to get him in the door.
So we have JoJo, Satch, Nelson, and Maxwell. All of these guys played longer for the Celtics than Ray or KG did, but aside from Maxwell it can be argued that Ray and KG were more important to their teams playing-wise than the other 3. So then we fall to the more important unscientific question: forget statistical comparisons, and focus on whether the player makes you FEEL like they're an indispensable Celtic, that 25 years from now we're going to be saying "I remembered seeing __ play" like we do for JoJo White?
For Ray, it just doesn't do it for me. I've loved Ray since he was at UConn; I've been calling him Jesus Shuttlesworth since the day "He Got Game" came out. It's either him, Reggie Miller or Dell Curry for "silkiest shot I've ever seen." His move to Miami stung, but that doesn't change 20+ years of my watching his career. But when I think back to the last 5 or 6 seasons, I just don't think of Allen as an indispensable Celtic. Yes, his shooting was a big reason we won that title, and he kept us in other games, but I don't think he really swung the betting line that much. It's not like Celtics fans saw that Allen was sitting out for a given game and went "Holy crap. How are we going to win this thing?"
But when KG was out . . . people panicked, the defense suffered, the emotion was down. The team just wasn't the same. The reason people treat their departures differently isn't really because Ray went to the Heat; it was because Ray didn't mean as much to us as KG did. KG did a money grab too, guaranteeing his contract in full; we just didn't care, because he had connected so much with us that we couldn't hate him for a second. Allen never gave his heart and soul to the Celtics, and that's fine; you can't fault a guy for making his family important, for making his life important. But I honestly believe KG never wanted to be anywhere else but the Garden, that he honestly never wanted to go until it was painfully obvious there was nothing left for him here. Call it "the Ray Bourque" effect; I challenge anyone on this board to say they hated Bourque for asking for a trade. And, really, no one blames Pierce for it either; they both gave their all to the team, so while it hurt to see them go we knew they deserved it.
So, in summary: yes to KG, no to Allen. It's just about feel in these things. KG may not have been our team's Kareem or Magic, but he was definitely our James Worthy