it's watered the league down. way to go out Stern.
Wait, putting talent together on superteams has "watered the league down"? I thought the typical definition of watered-down league was one where most teams had one or two good players, leading to many mediocre rather than several great teams.
It depends on your perspective.
If you're the type of fan who just wants to watch the best 4 or 5 teams, particularly when they play against one another, then you want as much of the talent in the league to be concentrated in the top tier.
If you actually want there to be drama in the standings and competitive games happening all the time, then you'd probably prefer a league where the best 10-20 players are on different teams.
In any case, even with the league as it is right now (top-heavy), if you took a handful of the better teams in the West and swapped them with some of the weaker teams in the East, things would seem a lot more balanced.
How many games would Denver or Minnesota win if they were in the Eastern Conference?