I think because Bradley is hitting FA people are trying to forget that 8mil is just what a good SG is worth. Same way there was a lot of delusion when Perk was hitting FA about an average starting C being worth 8mil.
8 million dollars would put Bradley in the top 10 for a SG.
I think people are swallowing the 8 million dollar figure without looking at Bradley's production and what is paid around the league for shooting guards. If you add in PGs you'd be paying him in the top 25 range of the league.
Is Bradley a top 25 guard in the league?
1. I didn't go looking, but I did mention who got a 5yr 43mil deal. He's probably a little better than Avery, but I believe 7mil of that was incentives which would likely be a part of Bradley's deal as well (most young players). Afflalo also had a player option, which Bradley probably wouldn't get.
I don't really feel like searching, but you can if you think you can find a more similar player. I believe Mayo got 8mil per, Reddick got 7mil, Korver and Henderson got 6mil per. And for the record not one of those guys play a single minute of defense.
2. Very rarely are the top 25 players the same thing as the top 25 paid players. That's a weird comparison to make, it's common knowledge that production does not exactly equal $ and potential plays into contracts pretty heavily.
3. For the record, Bradley is (among SGs) 15th in ppg, 10th in FG%, 9th in 3PT% (at least 1 made), 10th in rpg, 9th in spg, and basically unanimously 2nd in defense, so it's not really like his peers are embarrassing him (btw half of Bradley's #s are from playing PG and weighed down). I guess my question for you is do you have a number for how many SGs you think should be making more than Bradley?
4. Now that Bradley's shot is falling and he's gained confidence for the first time in the league, it's shortsighted to close the book on him and assume his value isn't going to up as the season progresses. Within the last 2-3 weeks Bradley looks like a completely different player and if he keeps it up then perspectives will change and his value will along with them.
5. The fact that he's ALREADY been offered 6mil per for 4 years by the Celtics obviously means something. Again, his play has been much better since then, and I don't think he'd risk getting injured on the whim that some GM would overpay for him. He and his agent have a far better idea of the market than you or I.
Also there are much more frivolous GMs out there than Ainge, so I don't see why using his number as a low figure is so ridiculous. On the other hand, if you told me Danny Ainge offered the most money for a player out of all the other GMs, I'd find that somewhat shocking.
6. Last but not least, I never even said 8mil regarding Bradley, I actually stated outright in my post I thought he was only worth 6-7mil (basically what Ainge offered but without the team option in the 4th year). The "8mil is just what a good SG is worth" was in reference to Stephenson and how people sometimes underestimate the value of one player to justify their estimate of a similar player.