Author Topic: Denver doesn't need McGee?  (Read 6453 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Denver doesn't need McGee?
« Reply #15 on: December 09, 2013, 08:57:24 AM »

Offline clover

  • Front Page Moderator
  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6130
  • Tommy Points: 315
It amazes me how KO has become a throw in on a deal, in some fans' minds, after 14 games in the NBA.

Re: Denver doesn't need McGee?
« Reply #16 on: December 09, 2013, 09:29:18 AM »

Offline manl_lui

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6571
  • Tommy Points: 427
McGee interested me when we had Garnett here. I thought KG could cover a lot of the holes in his game and be a good mentor to McGee. A risky gamble but worthwhile risk.

Without KG, I don't think Boston has the right environment for McGee to prosper. No longer a worthwhile risk in my view.

exactly what I was thinking, I don't want McGee anymore because KG is no longer here

Re: Denver doesn't need McGee?
« Reply #17 on: December 09, 2013, 10:09:19 AM »

Offline moiso

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7680
  • Tommy Points: 447
I liked McGee more than Deandre Jordan fairly recently.   But while Jordan has improved, McGee seems to have stalled out.  He showed awesome potential a couple years ago but has never improved since then.

Re: Denver doesn't need McGee?
« Reply #18 on: December 09, 2013, 11:02:12 AM »

Offline Smitty77

  • NCE
  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3063
  • Tommy Points: 269
Only IF Denver takes back GWall!!

Smitty77

Re: Denver doesn't need McGee?
« Reply #19 on: December 09, 2013, 11:16:50 AM »

Offline kozlodoev

  • NCE
  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17914
  • Tommy Points: 1294
It amazes me how KO has become a throw in on a deal, in some fans' minds, after 14 games in the NBA.
Yes, because Olynyk has become positionally expendable: he's not starting over Sullinger, and he's not playing center. No-one is giving him away, but if he can bring in starter value at a position of need (that is, center), he'll be shipped out with no remorse.
"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."

Re: Denver doesn't need McGee?
« Reply #20 on: December 09, 2013, 11:19:38 AM »

Offline moiso

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7680
  • Tommy Points: 447
It amazes me how KO has become a throw in on a deal, in some fans' minds, after 14 games in the NBA.
Yes, because Olynyk has become positionally expendable: he's not starting over Sullinger, and he's not playing center. No-one is giving him away, but if he can bring in starter value at a position of need (that is, center), he'll be shipped out with no remorse.
I think he'll be given a lot more of a look before Ainge thinks about trading him.  Unless he is included in some kind of no-brainer trade for a superstar.

Re: Denver doesn't need McGee?
« Reply #21 on: December 09, 2013, 11:25:43 AM »

Offline kozlodoev

  • NCE
  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17914
  • Tommy Points: 1294
It amazes me how KO has become a throw in on a deal, in some fans' minds, after 14 games in the NBA.
Yes, because Olynyk has become positionally expendable: he's not starting over Sullinger, and he's not playing center. No-one is giving him away, but if he can bring in starter value at a position of need (that is, center), he'll be shipped out with no remorse.
I think he'll be given a lot more of a look before Ainge thinks about trading him.  Unless he is included in some kind of no-brainer trade for a superstar.
He'll be given a lot more look, because I don't think anyone will ask for him in a deal at this point. I think he'll be gone in a second if someone specifically requests him in a trade for a starting-caliber center.
"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."

Re: Denver doesn't need McGee?
« Reply #22 on: December 09, 2013, 11:40:54 AM »

Offline Enzzo

  • Brad Stevens
  • Posts: 238
  • Tommy Points: 16
All set with Tragic Bronson.

Re: Denver doesn't need McGee?
« Reply #23 on: December 09, 2013, 12:01:24 PM »

Offline CelticG1

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4201
  • Tommy Points: 288
It amazes me how KO has become a throw in on a deal, in some fans' minds, after 14 games in the NBA.
Yes, because Olynyk has become positionally expendable: he's not starting over Sullinger, and he's not playing center. No-one is giving him away, but if he can bring in starter value at a position of need (that is, center), he'll be shipped out with no remorse.
I think he'll be given a lot more of a look before Ainge thinks about trading him.  Unless he is included in some kind of no-brainer trade for a superstar.
He'll be given a lot more look, because I don't think anyone will ask for him in a deal at this point. I think he'll be gone in a second if someone specifically requests him in a trade for a starting-caliber center.

That may be true but how many starting caliber centers are there?

I'd say any real starting caliber center for Olynk and it would be a no brainer. Just not for a guy like McGee or the plethora of garbage de facto starting centers

Re: Denver doesn't need McGee?
« Reply #24 on: December 09, 2013, 12:05:40 PM »

Offline moiso

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7680
  • Tommy Points: 447
It amazes me how KO has become a throw in on a deal, in some fans' minds, after 14 games in the NBA.
Yes, because Olynyk has become positionally expendable: he's not starting over Sullinger, and he's not playing center. No-one is giving him away, but if he can bring in starter value at a position of need (that is, center), he'll be shipped out with no remorse.
I think he'll be given a lot more of a look before Ainge thinks about trading him.  Unless he is included in some kind of no-brainer trade for a superstar.
He'll be given a lot more look, because I don't think anyone will ask for him in a deal at this point. I think he'll be gone in a second if someone specifically requests him in a trade for a starting-caliber center.

That may be true but how many starting caliber centers are there?

I'd say any real starting caliber center for Olynk and it would be a no brainer. Just not for a guy like McGee or the plethora of garbage de facto starting centers
We still don't know if Ainge would really want to slightly upgrade the team this year.  I don't think he does.  He seems to want draft picks, young guys like KO, and to clear cap space.  That's how he won his title the first time; not by trying to land average starting quality players.

Re: Denver doesn't need McGee?
« Reply #25 on: December 09, 2013, 12:10:40 PM »

Offline kozlodoev

  • NCE
  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17914
  • Tommy Points: 1294
That may be true but how many starting caliber centers are there?

I'd say any real starting caliber center for Olynk and it would be a no brainer. Just not for a guy like McGee or the plethora of garbage de facto starting centers
Don't get me wrong, I don't like McGee either -- he's like Jordan, except not as good and not as smart(!), both on the court and off. But I don't think Olynyk will be the sticking point in the discussion unless we're getting a star in return.
"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."

Re: Denver doesn't need McGee?
« Reply #26 on: December 10, 2013, 04:54:58 PM »

Offline jay

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1359
  • Tommy Points: 51
I started the thread because I think if anybody could reach McGee, it could be Stevens.  Could you imagine a guy that tall and athletic blocking shots for 25 minutes a game?  If you can get him cheap, isnt he worth the risk?