Author Topic: Really? (pro-tanking/rebuild argument)  (Read 9581 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Really? (pro-tanking/rebuild argument)
« on: December 06, 2013, 12:00:32 PM »

Offline djbilly33

  • Kristaps Porzingis
  • Posts: 184
  • Tommy Points: 11
I'm so annoyed by Celtic fans who don't wanna tank... Talking about getting a big name free agent and we're set... I feel like we're as delusional as Lakers fans but worse because NO FREE AGENTS IN OR ABOUT TO BE IN THEIR PRIME ARE GOING TO THE CELTICS! You keep saying that draft history shows its not kind to the celtics? Well I'm pretty sure free agency history is even worse. Minus the gift from McHale who gave us KG and the #5 pick that landed us Ray.Only out of their prime players come here, last time we won a championship then 5years of injury plagued seasons, I loved the ride but we need a young championship caliber team, and it starts with a young superstar, which we don't have! And we aren't getting a free agent superstar and we aren't trading for one unless they're very unhappy and demand it but then we have to get our roster to even get them, not happening, the smarter and more realistic route is through the draft, sorry we are Far away from another title, we're not just a few pieces, we are so FAR away so for the best future we should tank when it's the perfect time. Fate gave us a golden opportunity to tank and build with rondo and get him with a young superstar but we're blowing it so Ainge needs to make some trades ASAP, and about building a winning culture, since when did becoming the bucks and hawks making the playoffs every year then getting decimated in the first round qualify as a winning culture? No thank you I'll take winning titles as a true winning culture. We're the Celtics, we celebrate titles not winning the division and making the playoffs.  On a side note, please don't say I'm not a true fan, I been a fan for 30 years and do not want to go through another 22 year drought.  There's 3 or 4 possible superstars in this draft, proven or not, there's a possibility they can help change the franchise around. we traded PP and KG for a chance to land a good pick in the draft.

No fan on here wouldn't take a team of Rondo, Wiggins or Parker, Green, Sullinger and whoever we have at center next season?

So I guess let's celebrate their 8-12 record on top of the Atlantic and a 4th seed just to get bounced in the first round of the playoffs, sounds exciting.  Let's see how many real Celtic fans I ticked off.
« Last Edit: December 06, 2013, 12:09:18 PM by Fafnir »

Re: Really?
« Reply #1 on: December 06, 2013, 12:08:47 PM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
I'm not sure what you're trying to say here, people disagree that' just life. If it really works you up that much I don't know what to say.

But watch it with the defensiveness and "real fan" talk. The latter is against our rules and the former generally just leads to flame wars.

Sidenote: I'm editing your title to reflect the content of your post, if you want a different one that is descriptive feel free to change it again.

Re: Really? (pro-tanking/rebuild argument)
« Reply #2 on: December 06, 2013, 12:09:35 PM »

Offline djbilly33

  • Kristaps Porzingis
  • Posts: 184
  • Tommy Points: 11
Thanks

Re: Really?
« Reply #3 on: December 06, 2013, 12:37:37 PM »

Offline obnoxiousmime

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2428
  • Tommy Points: 261
I agree with you and understand the need to rant. However, I wish you had brought something new to the conversation if starting a new thread. Also, everybody (I've seen other people do it too) should try to avoid vague subject titles (thanks moderator).

Maybe just to get some extra views i'll start using some misleading, spammy titles:

You'll never believe what Glen Davis looked like in high school

90 percent of NBA fans don't know this free throw secret

Celtics Dancers pose with Red Auerbach portrait for sexy calendar. CLICK HERE FOR PICS



Re: Really? (pro-tanking/rebuild argument)
« Reply #4 on: December 06, 2013, 12:38:03 PM »

Offline Onslaught

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1768
  • Tommy Points: 156
1. Parker could stay at Duke another year.

2. Other teams out there are WAY worse then the Celtics. I'm not sure we could ever be as bad as them. So even if they try we won't get a top pick.
Peace through Tyranny

Re: Really?
« Reply #5 on: December 06, 2013, 12:47:46 PM »

Offline jc3celticsphan

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 513
  • Tommy Points: 20
and if we did tank and didnt get a top pick then whats the point keep tanking till we do?

and i dont know why people are so suprised that we are actually trying this season.

Players dont want to lose it kills everything you have in a locker room. you cant force an outcome you have no control over so tanking is pretty dumb if you ask me

I like what danny is doing with the team he just keeps building and building till eventually hes wealthy

rondo+winning=good free agents add some draft prospects and develope your rookies with a good coach=unlimited potential

we are 8-12 would you think that would have happen at the start of the season.. no because you thought this team sucked and needed a savior...smh you cant make your players lose we already had a better roster then most teams anyway there is no way we get a top 3 pick unless hawks and nets are terrible which danny already knew what he got himself into

expect a pick in the 10-14 range maybe even higher because the nets will eventually do better and the hawks will eventually do worse

Re: Really? (pro-tanking/rebuild argument)
« Reply #6 on: December 06, 2013, 12:48:38 PM »

Offline Lucky17

  • DKC Commish
  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16021
  • Tommy Points: 2352
Problems with tanking:

1. Other teams can tank harder.

2. Ping ping balls can drop a bottom three team out of a top-five pick.

3. Tanking destroys the value of your currently rostered players, so you don't get maximum value in trades.

Personally, I'd rather rebuild through solid trading and a lottery finish than a fire sale and only a chance at a top 3 pick.
DKC League is now on reddit!: http://www.reddit.com/r/dkcleague

Re: Really? (pro-tanking/rebuild argument)
« Reply #7 on: December 06, 2013, 12:51:23 PM »

Offline Celtics18

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11688
  • Tommy Points: 1469
I'm so annoyed by Celtic fans who don't wanna tank... Talking about getting a big name free agent and we're set... I feel like we're as delusional as Lakers fans but worse because NO FREE AGENTS IN OR ABOUT TO BE IN THEIR PRIME ARE GOING TO THE CELTICS! You keep saying that draft history shows its not kind to the celtics? Well I'm pretty sure free agency history is even worse. Minus the gift from McHale who gave us KG and the #5 pick that landed us Ray.Only out of their prime players come here, last time we won a championship then 5years of injury plagued seasons, I loved the ride but we need a young championship caliber team, and it starts with a young superstar, which we don't have! And we aren't getting a free agent superstar and we aren't trading for one unless they're very unhappy and demand it but then we have to get our roster to even get them, not happening, the smarter and more realistic route is through the draft, sorry we are Far away from another title, we're not just a few pieces, we are so FAR away so for the best future we should tank when it's the perfect time. Fate gave us a golden opportunity to tank and build with rondo and get him with a young superstar but we're blowing it so Ainge needs to make some trades ASAP, and about building a winning culture, since when did becoming the bucks and hawks making the playoffs every year then getting decimated in the first round qualify as a winning culture? No thank you I'll take winning titles as a true winning culture. We're the Celtics, we celebrate titles not winning the division and making the playoffs.  On a side note, please don't say I'm not a true fan, I been a fan for 30 years and do not want to go through another 22 year drought.  There's 3 or 4 possible superstars in this draft, proven or not, there's a possibility they can help change the franchise around. we traded PP and KG for a chance to land a good pick in the draft.

No fan on here wouldn't take a team of Rondo, Wiggins or Parker, Green, Sullinger and whoever we have at center next season?

So I guess let's celebrate their 8-12 record on top of the Atlantic and a 4th seed just to get bounced in the first round of the playoffs, sounds exciting.  Let's see how many real Celtic fans I ticked off.

Was that healing for you?
DKC Seventy-Sixers:

PG: G. Hill/D. Schroder
SG: C. Lee/B. Hield/T. Luwawu
SF:  Giannis/J. Lamb/M. Kuzminskas
PF:  E. Ilyasova/J. Jerebko/R. Christmas
C:    N. Vucevic/K. Olynyk/E. Davis/C. Jefferson

Re: Really? (pro-tanking/rebuild argument)
« Reply #8 on: December 06, 2013, 01:21:24 PM »

Offline BballTim

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23724
  • Tommy Points: 1123
I'm so annoyed by Celtic fans who don't wanna tank... Talking about getting a big name free agent and we're set... I feel like we're as delusional as Lakers fans but worse because NO FREE AGENTS IN OR ABOUT TO BE IN THEIR PRIME ARE GOING TO THE CELTICS! You keep saying that draft history shows its not kind to the celtics? Well I'm pretty sure free agency history is even worse. Minus the gift from McHale who gave us KG and the #5 pick that landed us Ray.Only out of their prime players come here, last time we won a championship then 5years of injury plagued seasons, I loved the ride but we need a young championship caliber team, and it starts with a young superstar, which we don't have! And we aren't getting a free agent superstar and we aren't trading for one unless they're very unhappy and demand it but then we have to get our roster to even get them, not happening, the smarter and more realistic route is through the draft, sorry we are Far away from another title, we're not just a few pieces, we are so FAR away so for the best future we should tank when it's the perfect time. Fate gave us a golden opportunity to tank and build with rondo and get him with a young superstar but we're blowing it so Ainge needs to make some trades ASAP, and about building a winning culture, since when did becoming the bucks and hawks making the playoffs every year then getting decimated in the first round qualify as a winning culture? No thank you I'll take winning titles as a true winning culture. We're the Celtics, we celebrate titles not winning the division and making the playoffs.  On a side note, please don't say I'm not a true fan, I been a fan for 30 years and do not want to go through another 22 year drought.  There's 3 or 4 possible superstars in this draft, proven or not, there's a possibility they can help change the franchise around. we traded PP and KG for a chance to land a good pick in the draft.

No fan on here wouldn't take a team of Rondo, Wiggins or Parker, Green, Sullinger and whoever we have at center next season?

So I guess let's celebrate their 8-12 record on top of the Atlantic and a 4th seed just to get bounced in the first round of the playoffs, sounds exciting.  Let's see how many real Celtic fans I ticked off.

  Even if you were somehow able to sway the opinion of every person here to "pro-tank" that would accomplish nothing. The team's going to try and win games. Short of knee-capping the players you're just going to have to deal with the results.

Re: Really? (pro-tanking/rebuild argument)
« Reply #9 on: December 06, 2013, 01:29:57 PM »

Offline D.o.s.

  • NCE
  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14061
  • Tommy Points: 1239
I find your lack of paragraphs more annoying than talking about tanking.
At least a goldfish with a Lincoln Log on its back goin' across your floor to your sock drawer has a miraculous connotation to it.

Re: Really? (pro-tanking/rebuild argument)
« Reply #10 on: December 06, 2013, 02:22:59 PM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
As far as our draft history goes... pretty much every Celtic legend was drafted into this organization with a Top 10 pick.  Pretty much every championship we've had was built on first bottoming out for an elite prospect or two.

Re: Really? (pro-tanking/rebuild argument)
« Reply #11 on: December 06, 2013, 03:07:24 PM »

Offline Section301

  • Sam Hauser
  • Posts: 155
  • Tommy Points: 26
  • Yum
As far as our draft history goes... pretty much every Celtic legend was drafted into this organization with a Top 10 pick.  Pretty much every championship we've had was built on first bottoming out for an elite prospect or two.

Auerbach traded Macauley and Hagan to get the rights to Bill Russell, no bottoming out required.  That's 11 championships, so "every" championship kind of goes out the window.

McHale & Parish came in on a trade of a #1 pick...previously acquired by trading Bob McAdoo. Bird was Bird, so he would have done something spectacular either way, but 2/3 of his Big Three was not acquired through picks generated from the Celtics bottoming out. 




« Last Edit: December 06, 2013, 03:13:02 PM by Section301 »
Good food, like good music and good love, always requires a little sweat in the making in order for it to be truly memorable.

Re: Really? (pro-tanking/rebuild argument)
« Reply #12 on: December 06, 2013, 03:42:05 PM »

Offline Lucky17

  • DKC Commish
  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16021
  • Tommy Points: 2352
DKC League is now on reddit!: http://www.reddit.com/r/dkcleague

Re: Really? (pro-tanking/rebuild argument)
« Reply #13 on: December 06, 2013, 03:54:55 PM »

Offline clover

  • Front Page Moderator
  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6130
  • Tommy Points: 315
As far as our draft history goes... pretty much every Celtic legend was drafted into this organization with a Top 10 pick.  Pretty much every championship we've had was built on first bottoming out for an elite prospect or two.

Auerbach traded Macauley and Hagan to get the rights to Bill Russell, no bottoming out required.  That's 11 championships, so "every" championship kind of goes out the window.

McHale & Parish came in on a trade of a #1 pick...previously acquired by trading Bob McAdoo. Bird was Bird, so he would have done something spectacular either way, but 2/3 of his Big Three was not acquired through picks generated from the Celtics bottoming out.

That's a specious argument if I've ever heard one. It took three 1st round picks for the C's to acquire McAdoo and they used one of the two 1st rounders they got back when they traded him away for the epic #1 and #13 for #3 and Parish, whereby the C's then picked up McHale at #3. Bird was a #6 pick and Parish was originally a #8 pick--so it took three picks in the top eight to get the real Big Three.

KG and RA were both #5 picks, and PP fell to #10, though he had been expected to go earlier. So Big Three were three picks in the top 10. For the C's to get RA, and KG, it took the #5 pick (who turned out to be Jeff Green), as well as the a historic 7-for-1 deal for KG that included two firsts, one of which ended up being a #6, as well.


Re: Really? (pro-tanking/rebuild argument)
« Reply #14 on: December 06, 2013, 03:55:38 PM »

Offline Jailan34

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 721
  • Tommy Points: 30
and if we did tank and didnt get a top pick then whats the point keep tanking till we do?

and i dont know why people are so suprised that we are actually trying this season.

Players dont want to lose it kills everything you have in a locker room. you cant force an outcome you have no control over so tanking is pretty dumb if you ask me

I like what danny is doing with the team he just keeps building and building till eventually hes wealthy

rondo+winning=good free agents add some draft prospects and develope your rookies with a good coach=unlimited potential

we are 8-12 would you think that would have happen at the start of the season.. no because you thought this team sucked and needed a savior...smh you cant make your players lose we already had a better roster then most teams anyway there is no way we get a top 3 pick unless hawks and nets are terrible which danny already knew what he got himself into

expect a pick in the 10-14 range maybe even higher because the nets will eventually do better and the hawks will eventually do worse


The Hawks are a playoff team easily in this east, and if we make the playoffs our pick can't be any better than 15th.
You can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into.