Why would Chicago blow it up? They are still a very good team and all it would take is an injury to Lebron for them to be a real threat in the East. That said, if they could find a good deal for Boozer or Deng, I'm sure they would take it (but they would have done that even with Rose). They aren't going to move Noah, Gibson, or Butler unless they get blown away by an offer.
Frankly, I think they are more likely to try and move Rose than Noah. You would have to think that if Boston offered Rondo for Rose (after Rondo is back and playing well) that Chicago would at least consider it, something that would have been laughable a little while ago.
TP...was thinking the same thing and just posted this on the Celts/Knicks/Bulls trade idea thread:
"Cs send: Rondo, Wallace, Bass and Lee
Bulls send: Rose, Deng, Mirotic, Teague, Snell, Charlotte's pick and a Chicago first from '14 or '15.
For the Bulls, Thibs and Rondo are reunited with some other players who can play D in Lee, Wallace and Bass which Thibs should like. Bulls get to compete this year as well as the next two, while Noah is still in his prime. Creates a little logjam at the 4 with Boozer, Bass and Gibson, although Gibson can play some 5.If the Bulls need more incentive, we'd take Boozer who has one more year instead of Deng's expiring.
For the Cs, IF Rose recovers, we get that franchise player that gpap describes above in Rose. Moderate risk, high reward. In addition, we get youngsters in Teague, Snell and Mirotic as well as stockpiling assets with the draft choices.
Bulls compete now. We compete later."
Whaddya think?