Author Topic: Trade Fits for Bradley  (Read 5577 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Trade Fits for Bradley
« Reply #15 on: November 01, 2013, 01:16:18 PM »

Offline pearljammer10

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13129
  • Tommy Points: 885
Ive been on the trade Bradley wagon since he was drafted. I just dont see a trade happening in season. He may be on the cheap currently but that helps us more than any other team because the would be trading for a commodity that wouldnt necessarily be coming back.


Re: Trade Fits for Bradley
« Reply #16 on: November 01, 2013, 01:17:50 PM »

Offline LooseCannon

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11833
  • Tommy Points: 950
The trade fit will be a playoff team that suffers an injury to a key rotational guard between now and the trade deadline, but I think Ainge is committed to seeing a Rondo-Bradley backcourt for as much of the season as possible.
Well, we suffered an injury to a "key rotational guard". How's that whole Bradley thing working for us? :P

Better than using Marshon Brooks and Courtney Lee in the same spot.
"The worst thing that ever happened in sports was sports radio, and the internet is sports radio on steroids with lower IQs.” -- Brian Burke, former Toronto Maple Leafs senior adviser, at the 2013 MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference

Re: Trade Fits for Bradley
« Reply #17 on: November 01, 2013, 01:26:01 PM »

Offline kozlodoev

  • NCE
  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17914
  • Tommy Points: 1294
The trade fit will be a playoff team that suffers an injury to a key rotational guard between now and the trade deadline, but I think Ainge is committed to seeing a Rondo-Bradley backcourt for as much of the season as possible.
Well, we suffered an injury to a "key rotational guard". How's that whole Bradley thing working for us? :P

Better than using Marshon Brooks and Courtney Lee in the same spot.
Yeah, and better than using Babb, too, if you want to toss around names that are not fit to be NBA players.

Also, Courtney Lee was the better player for most of last season.
"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."

Re: Trade Fits for Bradley
« Reply #18 on: November 01, 2013, 01:27:14 PM »

Offline chambers

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7483
  • Tommy Points: 943
  • Boston Celtics= Championships, nothing less.
I really can't see Ainge extending Bradley unless it's a home team discount. He's just too undersized to play the SG and his scoring isn't reliable enough as an SG to warrant him as part of our future.

He's great on a team with guys like KG, Pierce and Ray Allen all making moves and cuts and taking focus off him, but as the starting 2 guard on a contending team? No way.

Ainge might want to keep him as a long term 6th man, to help develop the culture of the locker room and defensive ethics for rookies but it will be too expensive. His value is much higher as a trade asset than a rebuilding piece at the moment.
Send him to a team like the Spurs- or send him to Minnesota for a first round pick.

Potential teams/trades? Some random hypotheticals if teams wanted him....
OKC Bradley+Bass for Perkins/first round pick or young player.
SAC Bradley for Jimmer+2nd rounder
SPURS Bradley for De Colo
NJ Bradley for Blatche

I'd say ultimately he's gone as part of a package to sweeten a trade. He'd be the icing on the cake for a team that acquires Rondo or Green.

We shall see. Either way I can't see a future with him in Beantown.
"We are lucky we have a very patient GM that isn't willing to settle for being good and coming close. He wants to win a championship and we have the potential to get there still with our roster and assets."

quoting 'Greg B' on RealGM after 2017 trade deadline.
Read that last line again. One more time.

Re: Trade Fits for Bradley
« Reply #19 on: November 01, 2013, 01:30:17 PM »

Offline VitorSullyandKOFan

  • Al Horford
  • Posts: 498
  • Tommy Points: 19
Wallace and Bardley for Cavs first round pick and expiring contracts.

Re: Trade Fits for Bradley
« Reply #20 on: November 01, 2013, 01:53:07 PM »

Offline Endless Paradise

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2867
  • Tommy Points: 182
That's actually a really good and balanced trade.  The Cavs get someone capable of filling in the gap at small forward in Wallace, plus a reliable defender in Bradley (all while making them stronger contenders); in exchange, the Celtics get a mid-lateish first-rounder (14-18), but tons of cap space.

Only thing is this depends entirely on whether or not those rumors of the Cavs wanting to make a run at LeBron actually come to fruition.  If so, they're going to want to keep that cap space, so they probably wouldn't be interested in Wallace (who also happens to play the same position as LeBron).

Re: Trade Fits for Bradley
« Reply #21 on: November 01, 2013, 02:34:30 PM »

Offline CFAN38

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4964
  • Tommy Points: 433
I would be shocked if he is traded.

Unless he is being packaged with others (not rondo or green) in order to bring in a star player there is little reason to move him.

He is still very young (22) and is playing out of position. He is improving at PG but its clearly not his natural position. Building teams don't trade 22 year olds with talent.
Mavs
Wiz
Hornet

Re: Trade Fits for Bradley
« Reply #22 on: November 01, 2013, 04:31:42 PM »

Offline Tr1boy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27260
  • Tommy Points: 867
To sac: choice of 2014-2015(2nd 1st round pick) and Ab

To bos: mclemore

Ab and cousins are very good friends.

Re: Trade Fits for Bradley
« Reply #23 on: November 01, 2013, 05:09:48 PM »

Offline 2short

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6080
  • Tommy Points: 428
To me on a good celtics team bradley is first guard off the bench, rondo and X are starters.  AB's defense would change the game as soon as he comes in either against a tired starting pg or a sub.
I'd want to see how he did on rondo in practice.  If rondo can handle him no problem then he would be a good piece paired with one of our 20 power forwards for a top notch big or shooting guard.
I like bradley and am sure he'll look better with rondo back (everyone will). 

Re: Trade Fits for Bradley
« Reply #24 on: November 01, 2013, 05:28:17 PM »

Offline Celtics18

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11688
  • Tommy Points: 1469
The trade fit will be a playoff team that suffers an injury to a key rotational guard between now and the trade deadline, but I think Ainge is committed to seeing a Rondo-Bradley backcourt for as much of the season as possible.
Well, we suffered an injury to a "key rotational guard". How's that whole Bradley thing working for us? :P

Too early to say.
DKC Seventy-Sixers:

PG: G. Hill/D. Schroder
SG: C. Lee/B. Hield/T. Luwawu
SF:  Giannis/J. Lamb/M. Kuzminskas
PF:  E. Ilyasova/J. Jerebko/R. Christmas
C:    N. Vucevic/K. Olynyk/E. Davis/C. Jefferson

Re: Trade Fits for Bradley
« Reply #25 on: November 01, 2013, 06:20:09 PM »

Offline aporel#18

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2332
  • Tommy Points: 170
To me on a good celtics team bradley is first guard off the bench, rondo and X are starters.  AB's defense would change the game as soon as he comes in either against a tired starting pg or a sub.
I'd want to see how he did on rondo in practice.  If rondo can handle him no problem then he would be a good piece paired with one of our 20 power forwards for a top notch big or shooting guard.
I like bradley and am sure he'll look better with rondo back (everyone will).

That would be the role I'd envision for Bradley, a microwave game changer on both ends, able to play 25-30 off the bench when he's on, for a solid MLE contract. With their own pick, the Celtics will have the chance to select their future starting SG, so there's no need to force things. Bogans, Crawford and Brooks will likely be gone after this season, so having Bradley and Lee as your 3rd and 4th guards is not the end of the world.

Of course, if you get fair value back, you trade any player, but what I don't understand is all the trade ideas like if the Celtics were in a hurry to make trades. There's no hurry to trade for Ainge & co. They have this season and next until the 2015 trade deadline to configure the Celtic team of the future. We need to be patient.