Bad comparison between Perk and Faverani,because Faverani also had a 80% free throws shooting and he took 16 shoots from 3 point range.I just read an article about how Faveranis team Valencia Basket is going to have problems to get a big as good as Faverani in the offence.If you see videos from Faverani you can see that he use both hands to shoot and he runs the floor very well also his wingspan is huge ,I don't know how can you compare him with Perk.
I didn't compare him to Perk. I just pointed out that him shooting 59% from the field proves absolutely nothing regarding whether he is a good offensive player or not.
And again, I refuse to watch you tube vids of a player and make assumptions on his skill based on highlights. I want to see him in game action versus NBA competition or at least in multiple competitive level basketball games to get a handle on his skill level.
You don't need to look at the highlights, I'll tell you the three things I saw that looked important.
1. He will take and can hit jump shots all the way out beyond the Euro 3pt line. Consistent? Who knows Frequency? Don't know. But he will do it and he can hit them. Perk comparison..."<Scowl> What's a jump shot?"
2. He can set non-moving picks, roll to the basket, catch a pass and dunk the ball. Again, frequency and consistency? Don't know, but he *can* do all of that. Perk comparison..."<Scowl> Come on man! That ain't a foul!"
3. He can take the ball on the low post, reset, and execute both spins, hooks, and up and unders with pretty nifty footwork. Sure, who know how often he can do it, but he *can*. Perk comparison..."<Scowl>Big Al does that junk, not me!"
What I saw said, "Not a stiff." Whether he can be more than "not a stiff" in the NBA remains to be seen, but deserves an open mind. Danny and his scouts *must* have seen a whole lot more of Faverani than we have in those highlights.