0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
I thought they took away the Harris offer no? But they got Ellis too now.
Quote from: BudweiserCeltic on July 13, 2013, 12:49:10 AMI thought they took away the Harris offer no? But they got Ellis too now.I hadn't heard that. But you may be right.In any case, the Mavs don't seem interested in playing their young talent. They are like the Nets in that respect. Not interested in building through the draft.
He doesn't have a signed contract yet. It would be a shame if this hurt him.
Quote from: saltlover on July 13, 2013, 08:29:13 AMHe doesn't have a signed contract yet. It would be a shame if this hurt him.I don't think it can hurt his contract situation, pretty sure first rounders are guaranteed a min. two year contract.
Quote from: PhoSita on July 13, 2013, 12:56:12 AMQuote from: BudweiserCeltic on July 13, 2013, 12:49:10 AMI thought they took away the Harris offer no? But they got Ellis too now.I hadn't heard that. But you may be right.In any case, the Mavs don't seem interested in playing their young talent. They are like the Nets in that respect. Not interested in building through the draft.They wanted to bring Shane Larkin along slowly. Start him off as a third string PG and have two established PGs ahead of him. Like they did with JJ Barea.