According to their
very early projections, they have the Celtics 9th in the east.
Their numbers are based on players under contract and are a bit wonky, as they would admit. There are obviously problems (a lot of which have to do with projected playing time) when you predict that the average team will have 42.6 wins. That's what happens when you use a brute force method.
I do find it amusing that their numbers have the Celtics with more projected wins than the Knicks or Nets (and the trade is incorporated into their numbers). The Rockets are, by far, the best projected team, with the Clippers, Thunder, and Spurs also projected for more wins than the Heat. Meanwhile Phoenix is abysmally bad.
While I think that even they would admit that the early projections are nutty and that there are still a lot of transactions to be made that can affect those numbers, I think the numbers mean that anyone who thinks the Celtics could end up close to a playoff berth is an optimist, but not a crazy, unrealistic optimist.