Those who gave up on Perkins his first 3 years in the league are the same ones giving up on Fab at the moment.
Not true. Count me among the people who was Perk fan but who is not a Melo fan.
There are two big differences between Perk and Fab:
1. Fab is 23 now. By the time Perk was 23 he was the starting center on a championship team, with four years of regular NBA play under his belt. Fab hasn't played a single productive minute of NBA basketball. And yeah I've heard the "he didn't start playing until late" line, but that is getting a little old at this point.
2. Perkins was as dedicated as any player I've ever seen in terms of conditioning and re-shaping his body to meet the demands of NBA play. I've seen no evidence that Melo shares that commitment.
So you discount the main difference between the two to prove what ?
Perk had far more bball experience and still took 5 years to develop. Melo just started playing the game. HUGE difference between the players.
I don't think that's the main difference between the two, actually.
But anyway it is a difference, I agree. But don't you think over time it becomes less relevant? Melo started playing when he was 14. He played two years of top-level D-I ball and has now been in the NBA for a full year. He's 23 so physically he should be pretty mature. At what point does he stop getting a pass because he's only played since age 14? When he's 25? 30?
Just to be clear we are not looking at a minor difference in performance. We are looking at the difference, at age 23, between a guy who played quality minutes on the best team in the league, and a guy who could not find garbage minutes on a mediocre team desperate for big men.
I'd be happy if Fab improves, don't get me wrong. But given what I'm saying here and my second point above about his effort level, I think it's fair to be pessimistic about his future prospects.