Still, I think in general Rondo is not seen as having similar value to the top point guards in the league -- Paul, D-Will, Curry, Parker, Rose, Westbrook, Irving in particular -- whereas I think a lot of Celtics fans would be incensed to be told as much.
That's exactly where I think Rondo ranks with a couple of other PG's quickly gaining ground (Wall, Rubio, Holiday).
I think at his best Rondo is at or near the level (of on-court impact) of those players, but his unique skillset means it's harder to find a good fit for him on a team. Rondo is also at his best less consistently than those other players.
Couple that with the fact that he's older than most of those guys and is coming off a major knee injury and I don't think it's surprising that his trade value isn't on the same level.
I think fans view it differently to GMs though and I think GMs are going to value Rondo similarly to the those top flight PGs.
OK probably a notch below Paul, Rose, Westbrook, Parker, Irving. but only because of the injury and age (although he is younger than Paul and Parker).
Rondo's unique skillset makes him difficult to match with a team, but his talent is undeniable and his playmaking ability (particularly in the spotlight/playoffs) should elevate him to that level. He shouldn't be downgraded just because he has a different skillset. That being said I can see how his market may be narrowed because he needs to be paired with scorers, whereas the other PGs fit more traditionally.
But GMs are evaluating the talent and trying to build playoff contenders and Rondo has that talent and is a proven playoff commodity.
The number of interested teams may be a lot smaller than what most people think, but I don't think that impacts his value greatly.
At the end of the day he is arguably a top 5, but at least top 7/8 PG in the league though and regardless of the number of suitors, we should get a return fitting that.