al horford

[krook]

it should be number 15, but anyways

al horford for

brandon bass + filler
can we get this guy to our team?

[bfrombleacher]

If we believe hard enough it might just come true.

[connor]

You need to STOP coming up with trades where we send out Brandon Bass and "filler" in return for other teams' best players or even good role players.

Bass is filler. Whatever trade he would be included in would revolve around another player/pick as the centerpiece. Bass would be the add on.

If we want Horford we are sending Rondo to Atlanta and they are going to pair him with Josh Smith. There is no way that they send Horford out of town for anything less, let alone Bass.

The only reasonable trade I've seen you propose is Bass and our 2013 first for Mozgov and Randolph. Now look at the talent coming back in that trade and compare it to Al Horford. See the difference?

[NocturnalRebel]

I'm surprised Krook didn't use Varejao's head. But Al Horford would be nice too.

[csfansince60s]

The best reply to these threads is no reply.


Oops! I think I just replied. 

[scaryjerry]

We wouldn't even be any better with Al horford to be honest

[bfrombleacher]

We wouldn't even be any better with Al horford to be honest

Wow. Really?

[CelticConcourse]

We wouldn't even be any better with Al horford to be honest

Wow. Really?

He's an All-Star, of course we'd be better... a third seed

[gpap]

We wouldn't even be any better with Al horford to be honest

Yes, we would be.

[bfrombleacher]

We wouldn't even be any better with Al horford to be honest

Wow. Really?

He's an All-Star, of course we'd be better... a third seed

Our future would be set, too.

[SparzWizard]

It's another Krook thread!

And I think we'd better with Horford than Smoove, but landing the Center will be unlikely.

[jambr380]

You need to STOP coming up with trades where we send out Brandon Bass and "filler" in return for other teams' best players or even good role players.

Bass is filler. Whatever trade he would be included in would revolve around another player/pick as the centerpiece. Bass would be the add on.

If we want Horford we are sending Rondo to Atlanta and they are going to pair him with Josh Smith. There is no way that they send Horford out of town for anything less, let alone Bass.

The only reasonable trade I've seen you propose is Bass and our 2013 first for Mozgov and Randolph. Now look at the talent coming back in that trade and compare it to Al Horford. See the difference?

I guess that should start another thread. How would people feel if we traded Rondo for Horford? I think both teams pretty much get what they want. Atl gets to keep Smith and Boston's guard-heavy line-up gets a humongous boost at the Center position.

There are very very few players for who I would consider sending Rondo out...Horford makes a lot of sense.

[LooseCannon]

can we get this guy to our team?

Sure.  All you have to do is something like this.

Step 1: Acquire a likely top ten 2014 draft pick.
Step 2: Trade the pick and matching contracts to Atlanta.  You may also have to throw in a young player like Sullinger.

[slamtheking]

You need to STOP coming up with trades where we send out Brandon Bass and "filler" in return for other teams' best players or even good role players.

Bass is filler. Whatever trade he would be included in would revolve around another player/pick as the centerpiece. Bass would be the add on.

If we want Horford we are sending Rondo to Atlanta and they are going to pair him with Josh Smith. There is no way that they send Horford out of town for anything less, let alone Bass.

The only reasonable trade I've seen you propose is Bass and our 2013 first for Mozgov and Randolph. Now look at the talent coming back in that trade and compare it to Al Horford. See the difference?

I guess that should start another thread. How would people feel if we traded Rondo for Horford? I think both teams pretty much get what they want. Atl gets to keep Smith and Boston's guard-heavy line-up gets a humongous boost at the Center position.

There are very very few players for who I would consider sending Rondo out...Horford makes a lot of sense.

I love Horford and would really like to get him on the team but if we're sending out Rondo, we need more than Horford coming back.

[jambr380]

You need to STOP coming up with trades where we send out Brandon Bass and "filler" in return for other teams' best players or even good role players.

Bass is filler. Whatever trade he would be included in would revolve around another player/pick as the centerpiece. Bass would be the add on.

If we want Horford we are sending Rondo to Atlanta and they are going to pair him with Josh Smith. There is no way that they send Horford out of town for anything less, let alone Bass.

The only reasonable trade I've seen you propose is Bass and our 2013 first for Mozgov and Randolph. Now look at the talent coming back in that trade and compare it to Al Horford. See the difference?

I guess that should start another thread. How would people feel if we traded Rondo for Horford? I think both teams pretty much get what they want. Atl gets to keep Smith and Boston's guard-heavy line-up gets a humongous boost at the Center position.

There are very very few players for who I would consider sending Rondo out...Horford makes a lot of sense.

I love Horford and would really like to get him on the team but if we're sending out Rondo, we need more than Horford coming back.

I would imagine we would ask for Teague since he would be a bit redundant with Rondo there; however, with so many productive pgs in the league and so few centers, I am not so sure if the Hawks would even accept that deal without at least a player like Sullinger coming back.