Celticsblog: where a slight and completely expected decline in a player's ability makes him a "staggering bust."
Terry is 35. One would naturally expect him to be worse than he was when he was 31. But, his numbers don't suggest at all that he's fallen off a cliff ability-wise.
First, Terry's shooting percentages are pretty close to his career numbers, and his numbers when he was 31-32. He's shooting .434/.372./.870 this year, and for his career he's .447/.379/.847.
Per-36 minutes his rebounds, assists, steals are slightly down, but not much.
The one number that jumps out is that even per-36 he's shooting and therefore scoring a lot less (13.5 this year vs. 18-20 in years past).
Interesting thing is that he's actually taking and making as many 3 pointers as he always has. So it really doesn't make any sense to call his performance in that area a disappointment.
The big decline is from 2-pointers, which he's taking far fewer of.
I think this means that he's just not able to get open for those little dribble and pull-up jumpers that he relied on earlier in his career. Nor is he flashing to open spots for mid-range shots as much. (Some of this might be how Doc is using him, too).
The other area of substantial decline, I'm guessing, is that in many years past he was one of the top "clutch" scorers in the league - on a par with Pierce.
http://www.82games.com/1112/CSORT11.HTMBut if he's declined there I would guess that's as much a function of minutes as anything.
But overall, I think his performance is about what you'd reasonably expect for someone on the downside of his career. To say that he it's a case of him "waking up one day and not being able to play" seems like a huge overstatement.