0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Boris Badenov on September 21, 2012, 02:01:51 PMQuote from: CelticG1 on September 21, 2012, 12:31:01 PMQuote from: kozlodoev on September 21, 2012, 11:21:39 AMQuote from: CelticG1 on September 21, 2012, 10:24:45 AMIts not exactly a gaping hole. Bradley and Terry are just as much of a point guard as dooling. Dooling was basically Eddie House with worse 3 point shooting and better defenseOh, but it _is_ a gaping hole. Not because we don't have PGs, but because we don't have enough bodies. At least not enough to start the season.On opening day, your backcourt consists of Rondo, Terry, and Courtney Lee.Your third string PG/SG is either Smith or Christmas. And then you have no-one. This is simply not enough. Especially given we have no solid grasp of how long Bradley will be out, or what he will look like when he's finally back.Yeah I guess that is a short rotation and projects Lee and Terry averaging 30+ a game which might not be ideal to start the season.Wish we had a better grasp on Bradley situation. No idea when he will be able to come back and how much rust he will have. We (including me) are putting a lot of weight into a very young guy coming back from injury who is still fairly unprovenWorst case scenario, Bradley is out/hurt/unproductive.In that case Lee is starting and our backup "PG" will be playing most of his minutes with Terry.You need someone who can set up the offense, and is big enough to cross-match on D. Christmas fills the bill there in theory, but we will have to see what he really brings to the table.But I think these other guys like Flynn, Bibby, Fisher etc. are all too small, and terrible defensively. Who covers Wade?Ha that's a terrible worst case. We are kinda screwed without bradley
Quote from: CelticG1 on September 21, 2012, 12:31:01 PMQuote from: kozlodoev on September 21, 2012, 11:21:39 AMQuote from: CelticG1 on September 21, 2012, 10:24:45 AMIts not exactly a gaping hole. Bradley and Terry are just as much of a point guard as dooling. Dooling was basically Eddie House with worse 3 point shooting and better defenseOh, but it _is_ a gaping hole. Not because we don't have PGs, but because we don't have enough bodies. At least not enough to start the season.On opening day, your backcourt consists of Rondo, Terry, and Courtney Lee.Your third string PG/SG is either Smith or Christmas. And then you have no-one. This is simply not enough. Especially given we have no solid grasp of how long Bradley will be out, or what he will look like when he's finally back.Yeah I guess that is a short rotation and projects Lee and Terry averaging 30+ a game which might not be ideal to start the season.Wish we had a better grasp on Bradley situation. No idea when he will be able to come back and how much rust he will have. We (including me) are putting a lot of weight into a very young guy coming back from injury who is still fairly unprovenWorst case scenario, Bradley is out/hurt/unproductive.In that case Lee is starting and our backup "PG" will be playing most of his minutes with Terry.You need someone who can set up the offense, and is big enough to cross-match on D. Christmas fills the bill there in theory, but we will have to see what he really brings to the table.But I think these other guys like Flynn, Bibby, Fisher etc. are all too small, and terrible defensively. Who covers Wade?
Quote from: kozlodoev on September 21, 2012, 11:21:39 AMQuote from: CelticG1 on September 21, 2012, 10:24:45 AMIts not exactly a gaping hole. Bradley and Terry are just as much of a point guard as dooling. Dooling was basically Eddie House with worse 3 point shooting and better defenseOh, but it _is_ a gaping hole. Not because we don't have PGs, but because we don't have enough bodies. At least not enough to start the season.On opening day, your backcourt consists of Rondo, Terry, and Courtney Lee.Your third string PG/SG is either Smith or Christmas. And then you have no-one. This is simply not enough. Especially given we have no solid grasp of how long Bradley will be out, or what he will look like when he's finally back.Yeah I guess that is a short rotation and projects Lee and Terry averaging 30+ a game which might not be ideal to start the season.Wish we had a better grasp on Bradley situation. No idea when he will be able to come back and how much rust he will have. We (including me) are putting a lot of weight into a very young guy coming back from injury who is still fairly unproven
Quote from: CelticG1 on September 21, 2012, 10:24:45 AMIts not exactly a gaping hole. Bradley and Terry are just as much of a point guard as dooling. Dooling was basically Eddie House with worse 3 point shooting and better defenseOh, but it _is_ a gaping hole. Not because we don't have PGs, but because we don't have enough bodies. At least not enough to start the season.On opening day, your backcourt consists of Rondo, Terry, and Courtney Lee.Your third string PG/SG is either Smith or Christmas. And then you have no-one. This is simply not enough. Especially given we have no solid grasp of how long Bradley will be out, or what he will look like when he's finally back.
Its not exactly a gaping hole. Bradley and Terry are just as much of a point guard as dooling. Dooling was basically Eddie House with worse 3 point shooting and better defense
give me jonny flynn. Bradley is not even close to being a PG..Doc said so himself...JET needs to be a scorer...not facilitator...Christmas? come on...he is a D leaguer who will never get off the bench if he makes the team. No chance he suddenly turns into a viable option at PG
Not Fisher. DA, please don't bring one my most hated players to Boston.
Quote from: angryguy77 on September 21, 2012, 11:50:59 AMNot Fisher. DA, please don't bring one my most hated players to Boston.If is most hated beacuse he played for LAL, why not Fisher if we already saied "yes" for Shaq?!
carlos arroyo. he knows the heat's weaknesses.
Quote from: eugen on September 21, 2012, 02:27:47 PMQuote from: angryguy77 on September 21, 2012, 11:50:59 AMNot Fisher. DA, please don't bring one my most hated players to Boston.If is most hated beacuse he played for LAL, why not Fisher if we already saied "yes" for Shaq?!Fisher played for the Lakers and is one of the most annoying floppers in todays game, he plays ugly. Hes also not a top 10 player of all time like shaq is.Amswer your question?
Quote from: flyofchange on September 21, 2012, 04:08:40 PMQuote from: eugen on September 21, 2012, 02:27:47 PMQuote from: angryguy77 on September 21, 2012, 11:50:59 AMNot Fisher. DA, please don't bring one my most hated players to Boston.If is most hated beacuse he played for LAL, why not Fisher if we already saied "yes" for Shaq?!Fisher played for the Lakers and is one of the most annoying floppers in todays game, he plays ugly. Hes also not a top 10 player of all time like shaq is.Amswer your question?So...beacuse Fisher is not in top 10 player, is not worthy to get him
Tmac in a Quis type role.He's there when there's an injury, garbage time, or foul trouble.Reliable to handle the ball, hit an open jumper, and keep the defense honest.Fisher wont' accept that type role, otherwise he'd be a Thundercat again.
Quote from: eugen on September 21, 2012, 05:13:36 PMQuote from: flyofchange on September 21, 2012, 04:08:40 PMQuote from: eugen on September 21, 2012, 02:27:47 PMQuote from: angryguy77 on September 21, 2012, 11:50:59 AMNot Fisher. DA, please don't bring one my most hated players to Boston.If is most hated beacuse he played for LAL, why not Fisher if we already saied "yes" for Shaq?!Fisher played for the Lakers and is one of the most annoying floppers in todays game, he plays ugly. Hes also not a top 10 player of all time like shaq is.Amswer your question?So...beacuse Fisher is not in top 10 player, is not worthy to get himNO! When a top 10 player wants to sign with your team you say yes no matter if hes past his prime and played for LA, the situations not the same when the player in question is flopping derek fisher who is also way past his prime.If you cant see how its different i dont no what to tell you...