0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
I think this starting 5 is very good:DwightGasolArtestKobeNashI don't think Artest is the defensive presence he used to be, but he's still low utilization. I'd expect Gasol to get the "harder" defensive job, so Dwight can help. Nash is very weak defender, and I'm not sure Kobe and Artest have enough athleticism to make up for it.I do like the JO backup plan, IFF he stays healthy, which he won't.Blake is a solid combo guard.They could really use a guy that can shoot and play D at SG (Delonte without injury problems.) Then they could run out:Dwight / JOGasol / McRobertsKobe / ArtestSG Nash / Blakewith Blake and Kobe backing up the SG. I think that a good coach (do they have that?) makes that rotation work really well.
Quote from: Brendan on July 19, 2012, 11:40:02 AMI think this starting 5 is very good:DwightGasolArtestKobeNashI don't think Artest is the defensive presence he used to be, but he's still low utilization. I'd expect Gasol to get the "harder" defensive job, so Dwight can help. Nash is very weak defender, and I'm not sure Kobe and Artest have enough athleticism to make up for it.I do like the JO backup plan, IFF he stays healthy, which he won't.Blake is a solid combo guard.They could really use a guy that can shoot and play D at SG (Delonte without injury problems.) Then they could run out:Dwight / JOGasol / McRobertsKobe / ArtestSG Nash / Blakewith Blake and Kobe backing up the SG. I think that a good coach (do they have that?) makes that rotation work really well.Aren't you forgetting newest Lakers addition?
For the Lakers it's all about matching up with OKC.Who does Nash defend? Harden and Westbrook will beat him up.Perk defends Howard better then Bynum because of the lack of an offensive game.Is Brown still having Gasol shoot threes?
Quote from: BballTim on July 19, 2012, 11:15:21 AMQuote from: celtsfan84 on July 19, 2012, 11:11:00 AMQuote from: esel1000 on July 19, 2012, 11:06:09 AMQuote from: Snakehead on July 19, 2012, 11:00:43 AMQuote from: esel1000 on July 19, 2012, 10:56:09 AMQuote from: Snakehead on July 19, 2012, 10:51:50 AMQuote from: esel1000 on July 19, 2012, 10:47:07 AMAm I the only one who thinks its a huge mistake to trade Bynum for the Dwightmare? D12s coming off back surgery... the difference between him and Bynum isnt that great to start with and for all we know his back could have hampered his abilities a bit. I just dont think its as smart a move as it sounds and if the Lakers get further than the 2nd round this year it will be because they got Nash, not HowardI think there is a pretty big difference between the two players. The only thing Bynum is better at is back to the basket scoring and Dwight is I think a good amount better at everything else and still scores 20 ppg. Add in Howard playing with a PG who can get him easy points finally?In addition, Bynum has had only one healthy season so bringing up health won't get you anywhere.It's a smart move for sure.True but Dwight was also "the guy" on the Magic. On a team with Kobe and Gasol I think his numbers may go down a bit... Good point about Nash, I actually think hes more important to that team's success to whether or not they have Dwight or Bynum. Still, coming off surgery, new environment, and having Kobe on your team I don't see him being much more effective than Bynum was on the Lakers. Could be wrong, but I just dont see itPerhaps in points he scores a game, you are right there. Across the board his numbers will probably look similar to Bynum on LA. I think his effeciency could be really amazing though and his FG % could be sky high. I've always felt he would excel with a real PG and he has never played with one. Think about Chandler with CP3 in New Orleans on steroids.He has never played with a player as close to as good as Gasol, Kobe, or Nash.However, his defensive prowess makes the team far better IMO. Not that Bynum is a bad defensive player but Dwight gets you 50 wins or so alone if he's on your team due to his defensive and rebounding dominance. The Lakers will be formidable.I see your points as well, Dwight with a real pg would be very good and would be the case here. Still, Dwight and Kobe are two guys who need the ball in their hands. Bynum has sort of learned to get along in the Laker system (Kobe takes a million shots and you get the rebound) where idk how it will sit with Howard... In all honestly I sort of see a repeat of the Knicks Amare and Melo, two plays who need the ball in their hand and dont mesh at all. Nash will definitely help with that, but if he goes down for any reason, I think that teams screwed honestly. Defensively they probably will upgrade a bit I agree there. Just remember this speculation also accounts for Dwight being at full strength after back surgery... we dont even know if that will be the case yet.Dwight doesn't need the ball in half court sets as much as you would think. He gets a lot of his points off of running the break (he is the quickest center in the NBA) which will not disrupt the Lakers offense. He also gets a lot of his points off of offensive rebounds which will not disrupt the Lakers offense.Comparisons to Amar'e and Melo are WAY off. I think even the most optimistic Laker-hater should acknowledge the fit is much better here. Dwight's been known to complain when he doesn't get the ball enough. He doesn't *need* it, but he obvioiusly wants it.If they are winning (which they will be), that becomes far less of a problem. Winning heals a lot of wounds.Complaining about touches when your best teammate is Hedo Turkoglu is a lot different than complaining about touches when your best teammate is Kobe Bryant . . . and you also have Pau Gasol and Steve Nash.Was Pierce more willing to sacrifice for KG and Allen or for Potapenko and Delk?
Quote from: celtsfan84 on July 19, 2012, 11:11:00 AMQuote from: esel1000 on July 19, 2012, 11:06:09 AMQuote from: Snakehead on July 19, 2012, 11:00:43 AMQuote from: esel1000 on July 19, 2012, 10:56:09 AMQuote from: Snakehead on July 19, 2012, 10:51:50 AMQuote from: esel1000 on July 19, 2012, 10:47:07 AMAm I the only one who thinks its a huge mistake to trade Bynum for the Dwightmare? D12s coming off back surgery... the difference between him and Bynum isnt that great to start with and for all we know his back could have hampered his abilities a bit. I just dont think its as smart a move as it sounds and if the Lakers get further than the 2nd round this year it will be because they got Nash, not HowardI think there is a pretty big difference between the two players. The only thing Bynum is better at is back to the basket scoring and Dwight is I think a good amount better at everything else and still scores 20 ppg. Add in Howard playing with a PG who can get him easy points finally?In addition, Bynum has had only one healthy season so bringing up health won't get you anywhere.It's a smart move for sure.True but Dwight was also "the guy" on the Magic. On a team with Kobe and Gasol I think his numbers may go down a bit... Good point about Nash, I actually think hes more important to that team's success to whether or not they have Dwight or Bynum. Still, coming off surgery, new environment, and having Kobe on your team I don't see him being much more effective than Bynum was on the Lakers. Could be wrong, but I just dont see itPerhaps in points he scores a game, you are right there. Across the board his numbers will probably look similar to Bynum on LA. I think his effeciency could be really amazing though and his FG % could be sky high. I've always felt he would excel with a real PG and he has never played with one. Think about Chandler with CP3 in New Orleans on steroids.He has never played with a player as close to as good as Gasol, Kobe, or Nash.However, his defensive prowess makes the team far better IMO. Not that Bynum is a bad defensive player but Dwight gets you 50 wins or so alone if he's on your team due to his defensive and rebounding dominance. The Lakers will be formidable.I see your points as well, Dwight with a real pg would be very good and would be the case here. Still, Dwight and Kobe are two guys who need the ball in their hands. Bynum has sort of learned to get along in the Laker system (Kobe takes a million shots and you get the rebound) where idk how it will sit with Howard... In all honestly I sort of see a repeat of the Knicks Amare and Melo, two plays who need the ball in their hand and dont mesh at all. Nash will definitely help with that, but if he goes down for any reason, I think that teams screwed honestly. Defensively they probably will upgrade a bit I agree there. Just remember this speculation also accounts for Dwight being at full strength after back surgery... we dont even know if that will be the case yet.Dwight doesn't need the ball in half court sets as much as you would think. He gets a lot of his points off of running the break (he is the quickest center in the NBA) which will not disrupt the Lakers offense. He also gets a lot of his points off of offensive rebounds which will not disrupt the Lakers offense.Comparisons to Amar'e and Melo are WAY off. I think even the most optimistic Laker-hater should acknowledge the fit is much better here. Dwight's been known to complain when he doesn't get the ball enough. He doesn't *need* it, but he obvioiusly wants it.
Quote from: esel1000 on July 19, 2012, 11:06:09 AMQuote from: Snakehead on July 19, 2012, 11:00:43 AMQuote from: esel1000 on July 19, 2012, 10:56:09 AMQuote from: Snakehead on July 19, 2012, 10:51:50 AMQuote from: esel1000 on July 19, 2012, 10:47:07 AMAm I the only one who thinks its a huge mistake to trade Bynum for the Dwightmare? D12s coming off back surgery... the difference between him and Bynum isnt that great to start with and for all we know his back could have hampered his abilities a bit. I just dont think its as smart a move as it sounds and if the Lakers get further than the 2nd round this year it will be because they got Nash, not HowardI think there is a pretty big difference between the two players. The only thing Bynum is better at is back to the basket scoring and Dwight is I think a good amount better at everything else and still scores 20 ppg. Add in Howard playing with a PG who can get him easy points finally?In addition, Bynum has had only one healthy season so bringing up health won't get you anywhere.It's a smart move for sure.True but Dwight was also "the guy" on the Magic. On a team with Kobe and Gasol I think his numbers may go down a bit... Good point about Nash, I actually think hes more important to that team's success to whether or not they have Dwight or Bynum. Still, coming off surgery, new environment, and having Kobe on your team I don't see him being much more effective than Bynum was on the Lakers. Could be wrong, but I just dont see itPerhaps in points he scores a game, you are right there. Across the board his numbers will probably look similar to Bynum on LA. I think his effeciency could be really amazing though and his FG % could be sky high. I've always felt he would excel with a real PG and he has never played with one. Think about Chandler with CP3 in New Orleans on steroids.He has never played with a player as close to as good as Gasol, Kobe, or Nash.However, his defensive prowess makes the team far better IMO. Not that Bynum is a bad defensive player but Dwight gets you 50 wins or so alone if he's on your team due to his defensive and rebounding dominance. The Lakers will be formidable.I see your points as well, Dwight with a real pg would be very good and would be the case here. Still, Dwight and Kobe are two guys who need the ball in their hands. Bynum has sort of learned to get along in the Laker system (Kobe takes a million shots and you get the rebound) where idk how it will sit with Howard... In all honestly I sort of see a repeat of the Knicks Amare and Melo, two plays who need the ball in their hand and dont mesh at all. Nash will definitely help with that, but if he goes down for any reason, I think that teams screwed honestly. Defensively they probably will upgrade a bit I agree there. Just remember this speculation also accounts for Dwight being at full strength after back surgery... we dont even know if that will be the case yet.Dwight doesn't need the ball in half court sets as much as you would think. He gets a lot of his points off of running the break (he is the quickest center in the NBA) which will not disrupt the Lakers offense. He also gets a lot of his points off of offensive rebounds which will not disrupt the Lakers offense.Comparisons to Amar'e and Melo are WAY off. I think even the most optimistic Laker-hater should acknowledge the fit is much better here.
Quote from: Snakehead on July 19, 2012, 11:00:43 AMQuote from: esel1000 on July 19, 2012, 10:56:09 AMQuote from: Snakehead on July 19, 2012, 10:51:50 AMQuote from: esel1000 on July 19, 2012, 10:47:07 AMAm I the only one who thinks its a huge mistake to trade Bynum for the Dwightmare? D12s coming off back surgery... the difference between him and Bynum isnt that great to start with and for all we know his back could have hampered his abilities a bit. I just dont think its as smart a move as it sounds and if the Lakers get further than the 2nd round this year it will be because they got Nash, not HowardI think there is a pretty big difference between the two players. The only thing Bynum is better at is back to the basket scoring and Dwight is I think a good amount better at everything else and still scores 20 ppg. Add in Howard playing with a PG who can get him easy points finally?In addition, Bynum has had only one healthy season so bringing up health won't get you anywhere.It's a smart move for sure.True but Dwight was also "the guy" on the Magic. On a team with Kobe and Gasol I think his numbers may go down a bit... Good point about Nash, I actually think hes more important to that team's success to whether or not they have Dwight or Bynum. Still, coming off surgery, new environment, and having Kobe on your team I don't see him being much more effective than Bynum was on the Lakers. Could be wrong, but I just dont see itPerhaps in points he scores a game, you are right there. Across the board his numbers will probably look similar to Bynum on LA. I think his effeciency could be really amazing though and his FG % could be sky high. I've always felt he would excel with a real PG and he has never played with one. Think about Chandler with CP3 in New Orleans on steroids.He has never played with a player as close to as good as Gasol, Kobe, or Nash.However, his defensive prowess makes the team far better IMO. Not that Bynum is a bad defensive player but Dwight gets you 50 wins or so alone if he's on your team due to his defensive and rebounding dominance. The Lakers will be formidable.I see your points as well, Dwight with a real pg would be very good and would be the case here. Still, Dwight and Kobe are two guys who need the ball in their hands. Bynum has sort of learned to get along in the Laker system (Kobe takes a million shots and you get the rebound) where idk how it will sit with Howard... In all honestly I sort of see a repeat of the Knicks Amare and Melo, two plays who need the ball in their hand and dont mesh at all. Nash will definitely help with that, but if he goes down for any reason, I think that teams screwed honestly. Defensively they probably will upgrade a bit I agree there. Just remember this speculation also accounts for Dwight being at full strength after back surgery... we dont even know if that will be the case yet.
Quote from: esel1000 on July 19, 2012, 10:56:09 AMQuote from: Snakehead on July 19, 2012, 10:51:50 AMQuote from: esel1000 on July 19, 2012, 10:47:07 AMAm I the only one who thinks its a huge mistake to trade Bynum for the Dwightmare? D12s coming off back surgery... the difference between him and Bynum isnt that great to start with and for all we know his back could have hampered his abilities a bit. I just dont think its as smart a move as it sounds and if the Lakers get further than the 2nd round this year it will be because they got Nash, not HowardI think there is a pretty big difference between the two players. The only thing Bynum is better at is back to the basket scoring and Dwight is I think a good amount better at everything else and still scores 20 ppg. Add in Howard playing with a PG who can get him easy points finally?In addition, Bynum has had only one healthy season so bringing up health won't get you anywhere.It's a smart move for sure.True but Dwight was also "the guy" on the Magic. On a team with Kobe and Gasol I think his numbers may go down a bit... Good point about Nash, I actually think hes more important to that team's success to whether or not they have Dwight or Bynum. Still, coming off surgery, new environment, and having Kobe on your team I don't see him being much more effective than Bynum was on the Lakers. Could be wrong, but I just dont see itPerhaps in points he scores a game, you are right there. Across the board his numbers will probably look similar to Bynum on LA. I think his effeciency could be really amazing though and his FG % could be sky high. I've always felt he would excel with a real PG and he has never played with one. Think about Chandler with CP3 in New Orleans on steroids.He has never played with a player as close to as good as Gasol, Kobe, or Nash.However, his defensive prowess makes the team far better IMO. Not that Bynum is a bad defensive player but Dwight gets you 50 wins or so alone if he's on your team due to his defensive and rebounding dominance. The Lakers will be formidable.
Quote from: Snakehead on July 19, 2012, 10:51:50 AMQuote from: esel1000 on July 19, 2012, 10:47:07 AMAm I the only one who thinks its a huge mistake to trade Bynum for the Dwightmare? D12s coming off back surgery... the difference between him and Bynum isnt that great to start with and for all we know his back could have hampered his abilities a bit. I just dont think its as smart a move as it sounds and if the Lakers get further than the 2nd round this year it will be because they got Nash, not HowardI think there is a pretty big difference between the two players. The only thing Bynum is better at is back to the basket scoring and Dwight is I think a good amount better at everything else and still scores 20 ppg. Add in Howard playing with a PG who can get him easy points finally?In addition, Bynum has had only one healthy season so bringing up health won't get you anywhere.It's a smart move for sure.True but Dwight was also "the guy" on the Magic. On a team with Kobe and Gasol I think his numbers may go down a bit... Good point about Nash, I actually think hes more important to that team's success to whether or not they have Dwight or Bynum. Still, coming off surgery, new environment, and having Kobe on your team I don't see him being much more effective than Bynum was on the Lakers. Could be wrong, but I just dont see it
Quote from: esel1000 on July 19, 2012, 10:47:07 AMAm I the only one who thinks its a huge mistake to trade Bynum for the Dwightmare? D12s coming off back surgery... the difference between him and Bynum isnt that great to start with and for all we know his back could have hampered his abilities a bit. I just dont think its as smart a move as it sounds and if the Lakers get further than the 2nd round this year it will be because they got Nash, not HowardI think there is a pretty big difference between the two players. The only thing Bynum is better at is back to the basket scoring and Dwight is I think a good amount better at everything else and still scores 20 ppg. Add in Howard playing with a PG who can get him easy points finally?In addition, Bynum has had only one healthy season so bringing up health won't get you anywhere.It's a smart move for sure.
Am I the only one who thinks its a huge mistake to trade Bynum for the Dwightmare? D12s coming off back surgery... the difference between him and Bynum isnt that great to start with and for all we know his back could have hampered his abilities a bit. I just dont think its as smart a move as it sounds and if the Lakers get further than the 2nd round this year it will be because they got Nash, not Howard
Quote from: celtsfan84 on July 19, 2012, 11:26:41 AMQuote from: BballTim on July 19, 2012, 11:15:21 AMQuote from: celtsfan84 on July 19, 2012, 11:11:00 AMQuote from: esel1000 on July 19, 2012, 11:06:09 AMQuote from: Snakehead on July 19, 2012, 11:00:43 AMQuote from: esel1000 on July 19, 2012, 10:56:09 AMQuote from: Snakehead on July 19, 2012, 10:51:50 AMQuote from: esel1000 on July 19, 2012, 10:47:07 AMAm I the only one who thinks its a huge mistake to trade Bynum for the Dwightmare? D12s coming off back surgery... the difference between him and Bynum isnt that great to start with and for all we know his back could have hampered his abilities a bit. I just dont think its as smart a move as it sounds and if the Lakers get further than the 2nd round this year it will be because they got Nash, not HowardI think there is a pretty big difference between the two players. The only thing Bynum is better at is back to the basket scoring and Dwight is I think a good amount better at everything else and still scores 20 ppg. Add in Howard playing with a PG who can get him easy points finally?In addition, Bynum has had only one healthy season so bringing up health won't get you anywhere.It's a smart move for sure.True but Dwight was also "the guy" on the Magic. On a team with Kobe and Gasol I think his numbers may go down a bit... Good point about Nash, I actually think hes more important to that team's success to whether or not they have Dwight or Bynum. Still, coming off surgery, new environment, and having Kobe on your team I don't see him being much more effective than Bynum was on the Lakers. Could be wrong, but I just dont see itPerhaps in points he scores a game, you are right there. Across the board his numbers will probably look similar to Bynum on LA. I think his effeciency could be really amazing though and his FG % could be sky high. I've always felt he would excel with a real PG and he has never played with one. Think about Chandler with CP3 in New Orleans on steroids.He has never played with a player as close to as good as Gasol, Kobe, or Nash.However, his defensive prowess makes the team far better IMO. Not that Bynum is a bad defensive player but Dwight gets you 50 wins or so alone if he's on your team due to his defensive and rebounding dominance. The Lakers will be formidable.I see your points as well, Dwight with a real pg would be very good and would be the case here. Still, Dwight and Kobe are two guys who need the ball in their hands. Bynum has sort of learned to get along in the Laker system (Kobe takes a million shots and you get the rebound) where idk how it will sit with Howard... In all honestly I sort of see a repeat of the Knicks Amare and Melo, two plays who need the ball in their hand and dont mesh at all. Nash will definitely help with that, but if he goes down for any reason, I think that teams screwed honestly. Defensively they probably will upgrade a bit I agree there. Just remember this speculation also accounts for Dwight being at full strength after back surgery... we dont even know if that will be the case yet.Dwight doesn't need the ball in half court sets as much as you would think. He gets a lot of his points off of running the break (he is the quickest center in the NBA) which will not disrupt the Lakers offense. He also gets a lot of his points off of offensive rebounds which will not disrupt the Lakers offense.Comparisons to Amar'e and Melo are WAY off. I think even the most optimistic Laker-hater should acknowledge the fit is much better here. Dwight's been known to complain when he doesn't get the ball enough. He doesn't *need* it, but he obvioiusly wants it.If they are winning (which they will be), that becomes far less of a problem. Winning heals a lot of wounds.Complaining about touches when your best teammate is Hedo Turkoglu is a lot different than complaining about touches when your best teammate is Kobe Bryant . . . and you also have Pau Gasol and Steve Nash.Was Pierce more willing to sacrifice for KG and Allen or for Potapenko and Delk? He's complained when he's been on pretty good teams, and he was still first or second on the team in shots.
Quote from: gpap on July 19, 2012, 08:45:09 AMIt makes me sick to say. However, if the Lakers get Howard, I don't see how they are going to be stopped in the West.In the East, I think Miami is still the beat team (on paper.)Lebron has clearly hit his stride, Bosh has been huge for them and they are putting quite a bench together with Allen, Battier and Lewis.Look, I think the C's will be a 3 or 4 seed again, no doubt.But can anyone honestly tell me the Celtics (as currently constituted) are a championship team?Yes, I know the season hasn't even started. Just going by what I see on paper The Celtics (as currently constituted) are a championship team. Feel better now?
It makes me sick to say. However, if the Lakers get Howard, I don't see how they are going to be stopped in the West.In the East, I think Miami is still the beat team (on paper.)Lebron has clearly hit his stride, Bosh has been huge for them and they are putting quite a bench together with Allen, Battier and Lewis.Look, I think the C's will be a 3 or 4 seed again, no doubt.But can anyone honestly tell me the Celtics (as currently constituted) are a championship team?Yes, I know the season hasn't even started. Just going by what I see on paper