http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1212178-rajon-rondo-can-boston-celtics-build-a-future-around-star-point-guard
Here's another article.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/06/02/SPAF1OS1A6.DTL&ao=all
And some more.
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1207701-why-rajon-rondo-is-the-most-valuable-player-in-the-2012-playoffs
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1187212-numbers-dont-lie-rajon-rondo-outperforming-chris-paul-in-2012-nba-playoffs
http://www.bostonherald.com/sports/basketball/celtics/view.bg?articleid=1061134882
http://www.celticslife.com/2012/04/magic-johnson-and-jon-barry-state-rajon.html
I guess you are right, though, LB33, it's probably just me and a couple of other green goggles wearing Rondo fans who think that Rondo is a superstar in this league.
I agree with you on some level. Rondo had an excellent playoff. He put up outstanding numbers. But most of those articles are comparing Rondo's playoff run vs Chris Paul's playoff run.... not Rondo vs Chris Paul. It's possible to poke holes in that argument just by bringing up the fact that Paul was being guarded by Tony Allen in round 1 and going head-to-head with Tony Parker in round 2... while Rondo faced the likes of Jeff Teague and Mario Chalmers. I can't overreact to 11 subpar games from Chris Paul and I certainly can't overreact to Rondo's playoff run this offseason. I'd love for Rondo to continue to average 17, 12 and 6 while knocking down some jump shots... but it's unlikely and ultimately we don't know whether Rondo will ever be consistent.
Within the next three years, we'll know the answer to these questions. Right now at gun point I'd take Chris Paul over Rondo without blinking. Maybe I'm wrong. Probably not, though.
FYI: If we were to look at just these playoffs (rondo going up against Atlanta, Philly and Miami)... Statistically Rondo was the 3rd best player in the league behind LeBron (#1 so far) and Durant (#2). Chris Paul was all the way down at #14. Now, in Paul's defense, he DID suffer a right hip flexor and finger injuries in Game 5 of the first round. Still, you'll get no argument from anyone that Chris Paul had a "better" playoff than Rondo. Clearly Rondo was phenomenal. CLEARLY. That said, if we're looking at the regular season, statistically (even given how amazingly awesome Rondo played), CHris Paul was the 5th best player in the league... and Rondo was 29th. In fact, if we're just looking at statistics (points + rebounds + steals + assists ... subtract missed shots and turnovers), a case can easily be made that Chris Paul, Russell Westbrook, Derrick Rose (when he played) and Deron Williams all were better than Rondo.
BTW... I get those rankings just by looking at statistical efficiency. Just a simple calculation of points + rebounds + assists + blocks + steals ... subtract missed shots and turnovers. It's not rocket science. Rondo gets a lot of much-deserved credit for leading the league in assists. That seems to matter to a lot of you guys... so you shouldn't necessarily frown at looking at all stats combined. Interestingly, Rondo was the 29th best player in the league this year. Even more interesting... if you look at statistical efficiency per 48 minutes... Rondo was all the way behind CHris Paul, Steve Nash, Steph Curry, Tony Parker, Russell Westbrook, Derrick Rose, Kyrie Irving, Jeremy Lin, Kyle Lowry, Ty Lawson and Deron Williams (this is mostly because Rondo averaged more minutes than any of them). Now... OF COURSE I do NOT believe that ALL of those point guards are better than Rondo... But Chris Paul is.
Rondo isn't going anywhere. Crossing my fingers that he can make the leap from 29th best player in the league to 3rd best player in the league permanently. If he could consistently do that (and not just against Jeff Teague and Mario Chalmers)... maybe the Celtics will be fine long-term afterall.
Last note: Not trying to crap on what Rondo did during these playoffs, because it was absolutely incredible (3rd most impressive stats these playoffs). Just wanted to say that part of the reason his stats were so incredible (17, 12 and 6) was because he averaged 43 minutes per game. If you even out the minutes (per 48), Rondo was actually the 12th best playoff performer (only counting players who actually played at least 28 minutes per game). KG was ahead of him. Note #2: Bron and Durant were still the top 2 per 48... want to know who the third was?... Tim Duncan. Well there you have it... Superstars make you a contender.