Fafnir,
You mentioned that NY gave up a lot of points at the FT line. Is fouling good defense? I am nit-picking, but NY simply is NOT a top 5 defensive team. You might have an argument that they are a top 12 or perhaps even a lower tier top 10 defensive team.
That is all I can give you:-))
Smitty77
A lot of points is relative, they played the 5th fastest pace in the league and gave up 24 FTA per game.
For comparison the C's played at a pace ranked 21st in the NBA and gave up 22.7 FTA per game.
A common feature of teams that force a lot of turnovers is that they tend to foul more frequently than other defenses. The Lakers give up the fewest free throws per shot attempt and force the fewest turnovers, that isn't a coincidence.
Once again when the opposing team has the ball 100 times to play against the Knicks then the opposing team scored the fifth fewest points in tne league this year.
They're a top 5 defense, and your nitpicking about individual statistical categories is missing the forest for the trees.
You can be a good defensive team multiple four basic ways (the four factors, though more goes into good defense):
1. Make opponents miss (eFG)
2. Prevent opponents from shooting (TOV)
3. Prevent opponents from getting offensive rebounds (DRB)
4. Prevent opponents from getting to the free throw line (FTA/FGA)
I'd add a fifth thing that I like to look at:
5. Force opponents to take inefficient shots (limit 3 point shots and shots at the rim this shows up in eFG% but I think its worth a separate look)
The Knicks are:
1. 12th in the league (eFG%)
2. 2nd in the league (TOV%)
3. 12th in the league (DRB%)
4. 23rd in the league (FTA/FGA)
The Celtics are:
1. 2nd in the league (eFG%)
2. 4th in the league (TOV%)
3. 20th in the league (DRB%)
4. 19th in the league (FTA/FGA)
You can be a good defense while being bad or average in any individual category.