Poll

Can GS reach Perk's skill-level or greater?

Yes
80 (60.6%)
No
32 (24.2%)
Undecided
20 (15.2%)

Total Members Voted: 130

Author Topic: Greg Stiemsma's Potential = Perk or Better?  (Read 65649 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Greg Stiemsma's Potential = Perk or Better?
« Reply #90 on: April 03, 2012, 04:42:45 PM »

Offline Eja117

  • NCE
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19274
  • Tommy Points: 1254
I had to say no. Isn't Steams like 26 already? Perk was playing better at 21 I think. I just couldn't go that far. I could even go to maybe 80% Perk, but I just can't go that far at this time. Maybe if he got lots of minutes things could even out, but I'm just not seeing it.

Re: Greg Stiemsma's Potential = Perk or Better?
« Reply #91 on: April 03, 2012, 04:47:48 PM »

Offline azzenfrost

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2067
  • Tommy Points: 177
I can't compare. They play the same position and have the same game goals. But how they go about it is different.
I moved the cheese.

Re: Greg Stiemsma's Potential = Perk or Better?
« Reply #92 on: April 03, 2012, 05:31:47 PM »

Offline dark_lord

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8808
  • Tommy Points: 1126
too soon to say

Re: Greg Stiemsma's Potential = Perk or Better?
« Reply #93 on: April 03, 2012, 05:57:45 PM »

Offline clover

  • Front Page Moderator
  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6130
  • Tommy Points: 315
too soon to say

Too soon to say he'll definitely be as good as or better than Perk, but a good time to speculate on his potential.

Re: Greg Stiemsma's Potential = Perk or Better?
« Reply #94 on: April 03, 2012, 06:40:10 PM »

Offline European NBA fan

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 984
  • Tommy Points: 141
I would like to see Stiemsma go through some actual big man training, before I judge his game.

The way he has improved on rotations, hedging (which he now does better than many centers in the league - leading to steals and turnovers) and general low post defense, makes me think that he has not reached his ceiling yet.

Re: Greg Stiemsma's Potential = Perk or Better?
« Reply #95 on: April 03, 2012, 06:43:18 PM »

Offline Rtpas11

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 803
  • Tommy Points: 76
Greg could be better than perk over time, but not sure if he's going to be as good in Doc's system.

Re: Greg Stiemsma's Potential = Perk or Better?
« Reply #96 on: April 03, 2012, 06:58:08 PM »

Offline Celtics18

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11688
  • Tommy Points: 1469
I can't figure out how Stiemsma's defensive rating is so out of line with his overall on court/off court numbers.

Both basketball value and 82games.com have him allowing 102 and 103 pp/100 on the court and the team at around 98 with him off the court.

I know Dean Olliver and other places rate possesions differently but that's a pretty big difference.

I just looked on NBA reference, and maybe that's a terrible place to look for these kinds of things, but they give Greg Stiemsa a defensive rating of 91 points per 100 possessions.  That's ridiculous.  By comparison, KG is second on the team at 94.
DKC Seventy-Sixers:

PG: G. Hill/D. Schroder
SG: C. Lee/B. Hield/T. Luwawu
SF:  Giannis/J. Lamb/M. Kuzminskas
PF:  E. Ilyasova/J. Jerebko/R. Christmas
C:    N. Vucevic/K. Olynyk/E. Davis/C. Jefferson

Re: Greg Stiemsma's Potential = Perk or Better?
« Reply #97 on: April 03, 2012, 07:23:21 PM »

Offline Big_Dave31

  • Brad Stevens
  • Posts: 238
  • Tommy Points: 37
His post defence is not the greatest, although, it seems that it looks a little better as the season has gone on.

Offensively though, he is more valuable as he has a nice jump shot that will only get better.  Good thing about Stiemsma is that he knows his limitations.  If he gets the ball, he will pass it off and keep the ball moving, unless he has a wide open shot.

How many of you used to cringe, or, just cry out "noooooooo!" every time Perk caught the ball in the post? (I know I did every single time he got the ball and didn't pass it straight away)  Don't get me wrong, I loved Perk, but, he thought he was much better offensively than he actually was.

Re: Greg Stiemsma's Potential = Perk or Better?
« Reply #98 on: April 03, 2012, 08:46:08 PM »

Offline Eja117

  • NCE
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19274
  • Tommy Points: 1254
Im pretty suprised that so many people think that Stiemsma can be as good or better than Kareem Abdul Perkins.  

Well, Stiemsma already has better defensive efficiency ratings than Perk ever has during his career. Granted, it's on a small sample size, but that's still pretty impressive.

Any stats that show that Stiemsma is a better defender than Perk in his prime are flawed.  I don't really give defensive metrics much creedence in basketball and baseball, many times they don't pass the eyeball test.

I think you're forgetting how many shots the Stiemer blocks or alters.
Yeah but with Perk I think there were a lot of guys that had to think twice about even going into the paint to be blocked in the first place

Re: Greg Stiemsma's Potential = Perk or Better?
« Reply #99 on: April 03, 2012, 08:51:40 PM »

Offline Eja117

  • NCE
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19274
  • Tommy Points: 1254
This is just me, but I think if Perk hadn't played with the KGs, and Rays, and Sheeds, and PJBs and Glen Davises and instead had continued to play with Al Jefferson and Delonte and maybe Jeff Green then instead of being an 8 and 8 and 2 guy he might have been a 12,10,3 guy. I don't think Steams could do that.

I think the better Steams comparison is Montross' rookie year. He averaged like 10 and 7 that year and showed good potential. I see Steams as like that plus 2,5 blocks as a top level.  Good Montross is not as Perk in his prime.

Re: Greg Stiemsma's Potential = Perk or Better?
« Reply #100 on: April 03, 2012, 08:56:01 PM »

Offline Meadowlark_Scal

  • NCE
  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8193
  • Tommy Points: 670
  • You say when......
I LIVE for the day that he gets more than 1 pass in the paint for all his hard work......as in..maybe work it to him a few more times so he can dial it in...work on a few more moves, so we have another weapon for the PLAYOFFS...as we have seen with everyone on this team, the more chances, the more positive development....oh, and one thing....don't EVEN mention PRACTICE..okay..it is now a FACT...DOC DOES NOT HOLD ANY PRACTICE...i have been saying this for a few years...if any of you read the HERALD, as i do daily, ...KG said it 5 times..NO PRACTICE..why he said it, not sure..maybe HE thinks it is DUMB to NOT practice also..!!!

Re: Greg Stiemsma's Potential = Perk or Better?
« Reply #101 on: April 03, 2012, 08:56:58 PM »

Offline Meadowlark_Scal

  • NCE
  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8193
  • Tommy Points: 670
  • You say when......
Well..WHAT is Perk doing NOW......where are his big #'s..?

Re: Greg Stiemsma's Potential = Perk or Better?
« Reply #102 on: April 03, 2012, 09:09:14 PM »

Offline Eja117

  • NCE
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19274
  • Tommy Points: 1254
Well..WHAT is Perk doing NOW......where are his big #'s..?
Now's not his prime. He's very banged up now.

Re: Greg Stiemsma's Potential = Perk or Better?
« Reply #103 on: April 03, 2012, 09:10:46 PM »

Offline CoachBo

  • NCE
  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6069
  • Tommy Points: 336
Steamer compared to Perkins?

The apocalpyse is truly upon us.

 ;D
Coined the CelticsBlog term, "Euromistake."

Re: Greg Stiemsma's Potential = Perk or Better?
« Reply #104 on: April 03, 2012, 09:11:13 PM »

Offline azzenfrost

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2067
  • Tommy Points: 177
If they practiced, then the C's would lose more. What would their calendar say then?

Mon - Practice
Tue - Game
Wed - Practice
Thu - Game
Fri - Practice
Sat - Game
Sun - Game

??? Pfft. No thanks. I want them rested for when it counts. Not exhausted by the time they have to suit up. It's not Doc's fault that there was a lockout that caused a jam packed season. Get over it.
I moved the cheese.